Skip to content
National Council of Jewish Women Greater Dallas Section at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

National Council of Jewish Women Greater Dallas Section

The Organization is a volunteer organization, inspired by Jewish values, working through a program of research, education, advocacy, and community service to improve the quality of life for women, children, and families striving to ensure individual rights and freedoms.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$65kHealth$34kFood & Nutrition$15k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $13,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vickery Meadow Alliance$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Literacy Achieves: $10k → 14%Jewish Family Service of GD: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arlington Life Shelter

The mission of Arlington Life Shelter is to promote self-sufficiency by providing shelter, employment programs and transitional services for North Texans impacted by homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
2
Denton County Friends of the Family Inc

Friends of the Family is dedicated to providing compassionate, comprehensive services to those impacted by rape, sexual abuse, and domestic violence, while partnering with our community to promote safety, healing and prevention.

Human Services
3
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas Foundation

Supports visiting nurse association of texas, who's mission is to provide care to our community, enhancing health and well being with compassion, dignity and integrity.

Health
4
Dallas Life Inc

Dallas Life, Inc., operating as Thrive Women's Clinic, is a life-affirming faith-based Christian ministry committed to supporting women and their partners facing unexpected pregnancies. Our mission is to demonstrate Christ-like love in a…

Unclassified
5
Violence Intervention and Prevention Fort Worth

VIP Fort Worth mission is to end cyclical and retalitory gun violence in Fort Worth neighborhoods by investing in development health, and well-being of those at the center of this crisis.

Human Services
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Collin County Inc

To provide trained community volunteers to advocate the best interests of abused or neglected children in cps custody from collin county.

Civil Rights
7
Vibrant Woman Mama Sana

Vibrant Woman-Mama Sana seeks to directly address the grave and racialized maternal and infant health disparities in the United States and to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes for communities of color in Central Texas.

Health
8
Ronald Mcdonald House of Fort Worth Inc

Provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
9
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
10
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
11
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
12
Dallas Services

The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Muslim Womens Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vickery Meadow Neighborhood Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION I…VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTERJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS …MOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $12,500 · HealthMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TE…VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $10,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TE…FEED OAK CLIFF: $13,500 · OtherFEED OAK CLIFFOUR FRIENDS PLACE: $12,500 · OtherOUR FRIENDS PLACEVICKERY MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE: $15,000 · Food & NutritionVICKERY MEADOW …DALLAS CASA: $7,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$32,500Health$32,500Other$26,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Civil Rights$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVICKERY MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUR FRIENDS PLACE: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CASA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropo…Texas Women's Foundat…The Dallas FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Texas Instruments Fou…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Metropolitan Dallas IncTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Women's Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Council of Jewish Women Greater Dallas Section funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Council of Jewish Women Greater Dallas Section. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Council of Jewish Women Greater Dallas Section’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home