Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Council of Jewish Women Greater Dallas Section

The Organization is a volunteer organization, inspired by Jewish values, working through a program of research, education, advocacy, and community service to improve the quality of life for women, children, and families striving to ensure individual rights and freedoms.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Human Services$33kHealth$33kFood & Nutrition$15kCivil Rights$7kOther$26k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $7,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vickery Meadow Alliance$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Literacy Achieves: $10k → 14%Jewish Family Service of GD: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arlington Life Shelter

The mission of Arlington Life Shelter is to promote self-sufficiency by providing shelter, employment programs and transitional services for North Texans impacted by homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
2
Denton County Friends of the Family Inc

Friends of the Family is dedicated to providing compassionate, comprehensive services to those impacted by rape, sexual abuse, and domestic violence, while partnering with our community to promote safety, healing and prevention.

Human Services
3
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas Foundation

Supports visiting nurse association of texas, who's mission is to provide care to our community, enhancing health and well being with compassion, dignity and integrity.

Health
4
Dallas Life Inc

Dallas Life, Inc., operating as Thrive Women's Clinic, is a life-affirming faith-based Christian ministry committed to supporting women and their partners facing unexpected pregnancies. Our mission is to demonstrate Christ-like love in a…

Unclassified
5
Violence Intervention and Prevention Fort Worth

VIP Fort Worth mission is to end cyclical and retalitory gun violence in Fort Worth neighborhoods by investing in development health, and well-being of those at the center of this crisis.

Human Services
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Collin County Inc

To provide trained community volunteers to advocate the best interests of abused or neglected children in cps custody from collin county.

Civil Rights
7
Vibrant Woman Mama Sana

Vibrant Woman-Mama Sana seeks to directly address the grave and racialized maternal and infant health disparities in the United States and to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes for communities of color in Central Texas.

Health
8
Ronald Mcdonald House of Fort Worth Inc

Provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

9
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

10
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
11
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

12
Dallas Services

The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Muslim Womens Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vickery Meadow Neighborhood Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION I…VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTERJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS …MOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC — $12,500 · HealthMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INCVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS — $10,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TE…FEED OAK CLIFF — $13,500 · OtherFEED OAK CLIFFOUR FRIENDS PLACE — $12,500 · OtherOUR FRIENDS PLACEVICKERY MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE — $15,000 · Food & NutritionVICKERY MEADOW …DALLAS CASA — $7,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$32,500Health$32,500Other$26,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Civil Rights$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVICKERY MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOUR FRIENDS PLACE — $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMOSAIC FAMILY SERVICES INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CASA — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Dallas IncTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Women's Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Council of Jewish Women Greater Dallas Section funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph