Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Association of Chronic Disease Directors

The National Association of Chronic Disease Directors (NACDD) is a national public health association of chronic disease directors.

$734k
Granted FY2021
22
Grants FY2021
18
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2021 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $716,672 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $734,080 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,408 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $443k
$24,015
Median grant
18
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PREVENT BLINDNESS WISCONSIN$104,517
AL LIONS SIGHT CONSERVATION$96,900
PREVENT BLINDNESS OHIO$75,000
PREVENT BLINDNESS NORTH CAROL$59,947
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$55,750
PREVENT BILINDNESS TEXAS$50,570
COLORADO PHARMACISTS SOCIETY$37,880
HEALTH PROMOTION COUNCIL$31,292
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF AGING$29,863
OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY$25,000
RHODE ISLAND DEPT OF HEALTH$24,015
MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH$19,024
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$17,593
DC DEPT OF HEALTH$16,225
ARIZONA DEPT OF HEALTH$16,225
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREVENT BLINDNESS NORTH CAROL: $60k → 8%PREVENT BLINDNESS NORTH CAROL: $48k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
RI
CO
AZ
NM
KS
AR
NC
DC
HI
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$663k · 10 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$663k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+115%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $293k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ALABAMA LIONS SIGHT ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $128k · revenue +43%
  • NS
    NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLIND-
    2× · 2020–2021 · $108k · revenue +31%
  • PB
    Prevent Blindness Texas
    2× · 2020–2021 · $73k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $124k
  • HP
    HAWAII PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +115%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
    one grant, 2020 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

3
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
4
Prevent Blindness Iowa

to prevent blindness and preserve sight

5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Society to Prevent Blind- and the most unlike its peers is Health Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Prevent Blindness Wisconsin — $133,875 · OtherPrevent Blindness WisconsinWASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH — $124,387 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHSTATE OF OHIO — $90,085 · OtherSTATE OF OHIONational Society to Prevent BlindnessOhio Affiliate — $75,000 · OtherNational Society to Prevent BlindnessOhio AffiliatePrevent Blindness Texas — $73,013 · OtherPrevent Blindness TexasTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $70,697 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYHealth Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc — $31,292 · OtherOREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY — $25,000 · Other+8 more — $125,822 · Other+8 moreALABAMA LIONS SIGHT ASSOCIATION INC — $127,500 · HealthALABAMA LIONS SI…HEALTH RESEARCH INC — $17,600 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH …HAWAII PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $10,213 · HealthHAWAII PRIMARY C…GREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION INC — $9,000 · HealthGREATER FLINT HE…NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLIND- — $107,700 · Human ServicesNATIONAL SO…New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $15,000 · EducationSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE — $12,000 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $11,946 · EducationCOLORADO PHARMACISTS SOCIETY INC — $37,880 · Community Improvement
Other$749,171Health$164,313Human Services$107,700Education$38,946Community Improvement$37,880

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPrevent Blindness Wisconsin — $133,875 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetALABAMA LIONS SIGHT ASSOCIATION INC — $127,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLIND- — $107,700 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetNational Society to Prevent BlindnessOhio Affiliate — $75,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPrevent Blindness Texas — $73,013 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCOLORADO PHARMACISTS SOCIETY INC — $37,880 over 1y, 14% of budgetHealth Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc — $31,292 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC — $17,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $11,946 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $10,213 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER FLINT HEALTH COALITION INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $6,314 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Association of Public Health Laboratories IncMD20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · AARP · Share Our Strength · National Society to Prevent Blindness · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · National Council of State Boards of Nursing · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Association of Chronic Disease Directors funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Springfield College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph