Skip to content

Ohio · Public charity

Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation

Abortion forward alliance uses public education to develop a constituency that supports the right of every ohioan to make personal choices about a full range of reproductive options, including legal abortion.

$980k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
9
Organizations funded FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Hopewell Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $980k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’21
1
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$137,585
Largest grant, FY2021
$137,585
States reached, FY2021
9
Total assets, FY2021
$1.8M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Civil Rights$865kHealth$413kHuman Services$157kArts & Culture$79k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MA
OR
CT
MO
VA
MD
NC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Where it is load-bearing

Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 5 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetReproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc: $137,585 over 1y, 34% of budgetPro-Choice Minnesota Foundation: $137,585 over 1y, 73% of budgetPro-Choice Virginia Foundation: $137,585 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetPro-Choice Oregon Foundation: $137,585 over 1y, 36% of budgetPro-Choice Washington Foundation: $137,585 over 1y, 24% of budgetNARAL Pro-Choice Maryland Fund Inc: $78,620 over 1y, 28% of budgetAbortion Action Missouri Foundation: $78,620 over 1y, 23% of budgetPro-Choice Nc Foundation: $78,620 over 1y, 41% of budgetReproductive Equity Now Inc: $53,125 over 1y, 21% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reproductive Freedom for AllDC26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reproductive Freedom for All · Reproductive Freedom for All Foundation · Hopewell Fund · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · New Venture Fund · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · The Lalor Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation

How much does Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation give?
Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $979,943 in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2023, its largest causes are Civil Rights (57%), Health (27%), Human Services (10%).
Who are Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2023: Reproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc ($138k), Pro-Choice Minnesota Foundation ($138k), Pro-Choice Virginia Foundation ($138k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Reproductive Freedom for All, Reproductive Freedom for All Foundation, Hopewell Fund.
Where is Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation based?
Naral Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Naral Pro-Choice Ohio’s filings →

More from the funding graph