Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nara Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$455kHealth$260kFood & Nutrition$173kHuman Services$91kYouth Development$76kEducation$56kInternational$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$9,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM$25,000
FRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING$20,000
READY SET SMILE$15,000
SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$10,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$10,000
CIRCLE OF FRIENDS$10,000
CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION$9,000
LATHAM MEMORIAL LIBRARY$7,040
VERMONT FOODBANK$5,000
THEATER LATT DA$5,000
KENYA INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$3,500
THETFORD FOOD SHELF$3,000
COMMUNITY NURSE OF THETFORD$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIKE'S 5K TO CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE: $2k → 7%WILLING HANDS: $5k → 9%SECOND WIND FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%CAMP CARE NEVADA FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
CA
VA
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 18 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+14%

Still filing today

61%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +83%
  • RS
    READY SET SMILE PA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +196%
  • TL
    THEATER LATTE DA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +49%
  • S
    STEP
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • WH
    WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joslin Diabetes Center Inc

Our mission is to prevent, treat, and cure diabetes. our vision is a world free of diabetes and its complications.

Health
2
Winchester Hospital

The mission of winchester hospital is "to care. to heal. to excel." this ethos provides each and every staff member with clear expectations, promoting teamwork and respect while ensuring safety, quality and empathy for patients. winchester…

Health
3
Beth Israel Lahey Health Inc

Beth israel lahey health inc.'s mission is to support its affiliates and their healthcare missions, to improve the health of patients, their families and the communities served and as a network its purpose is to create healthier…

Health
4
Joslin Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality specialty medical care to patients with diabetes and diabetes related conditions and to search for a cure.

Health
5
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital - Milton

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-milton, inc. (bid-milton or hospital) is to provide safe, high-quality, community-based health care and access to tertiary care in close collaboration with its sister hospital, beth israel…

Health
6
Lahey Clinic Foundation Inc

The lahey clinic foundation, inc. (lcf) serves as the sole member and supports the lahey clinic (lc) and lahey clinic hospital d/b/a lahey hospital & medical center (lhmc), enabling lhmc and lc to provide superior health care leading to…

Health
7
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth Inc

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-plymouth, inc. (bid-plymouth or hospital) is to improve the health and well-being of its patients and communities by providing a full continuum of healthcare services with excellence and…

Health
8
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
9
Beth Israel Lahey Health Primary Care

Beth israel lahey health primary care (bilhpc) is a network of community based physicians affiliated with the beth israel lahey health (bilh) network and serving the patients and communities served by the lahey clinic hospital (lahey…

10
Lahey Clinic Inc

Lahey clinic (lc) provides the highest quality interdisciplinary and coordinated patient care leading to the best possible outcomes and experiences for every patient, advancing medicine through research and educating tomorrow's health care…

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
Beth Israel Lahey Health Specialty Care F/K/a Northeast Medical Practice

Beth israel lahey health specialty care f/k/a northeast medical practice (bilhsc fka nmp) primary mission is to provide high quality medical care to the patients of northeast hospital corporation (beverly hospital, addison gilbert hospital…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boston Medical Center Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Thetford Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INC — $210,000 · OtherFUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INCFRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING — $122,000 · OtherFRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPINGTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA — $90,500 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERACIRCLE OF FRIENDS — $76,000 · OtherCIRCLE OF FRIENDSLatham Memorial Library Inc — $51,565 · OtherLatham Memorial Library IncSAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA — $30,000 · OtherTHETFORD FOOD SHELF — $23,500 · Other+11 more — $71,900 · Other+11 moreREADY SET SMILE PA — $128,500 · HealthREADY SET SMILE PABETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $45,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS…KIDS AND HORSES INC — $44,290 · HealthKIDS AND HORSES INCBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthTHEATER LATTE DA — $105,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATER L…Campcare Nevada Foundation — $65,205 · Human ServicesWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesSECOND WIND FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesONEVILLAGE PARTNERS — $50,000 · InternationalVERMONT FOODBANK — $48,000 · Food & NutritionThetford Volunteer Fire Department — $15,230 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$675,465Health$229,790Arts & Culture$105,000Human Services$77,205International$50,000Food & Nutrition$48,000Public Safety & Disaster$15,230

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INC — $210,000 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetREADY SET SMILE PA — $128,500 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetTHEATER LATTE DA — $105,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF FRIENDS — $76,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetCampcare Nevada Foundation — $65,205 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetLatham Memorial Library Inc — $51,565 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetONEVILLAGE PARTNERS — $50,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK — $48,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS AND HORSES INC — $44,290 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetThetford Volunteer Fire Department — $15,230 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND WIND FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRWARNING INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Thyroid Association — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLung Cancer Alliance — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIKE'S 5K TO CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM INC
  • Who funds READY SET SMILE PA
  • Who funds THEATER LATTE DA
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF FRIENDS
  • Who funds Campcare Nevada Foundation
  • Who funds Latham Memorial Library Inc
  • Who funds ONEVILLAGE PARTNERS
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds KIDS AND HORSES INC
  • Who funds Thetford Volunteer Fire Department
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
  • Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds SECOND WIND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc
  • Who funds FAIRWARNING INC
  • Who funds American Thyroid Association
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY INC
  • Who funds Lung Cancer Alliance
  • Who funds MIKE'S 5K TO CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nara Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • Second Wind Foundation85% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc17% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank13% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • Latham Memorial Library Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph