Skip to content
Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund

The Organization's primary exempt purpose is to hold and distribute board-designated funds for Auction Napa Valley, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, to Napa County non-profit organizations according to the organizations's giving guidelines.

$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$30MHuman Services$14MEducation$8.7MYouth Development$4.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.3MEnvironment$550kCrime & Legal$420kArts & Culture$110kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $346k
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.2M
$300,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Napa Valley Unified Ed Fdtn$1,070,000
Mentis$1,050,000
Napa Communities Firewise Fdn$850,000
Aldea Children & Family Svcs$300,000
On The MoveVoices$300,000
Queen of the Valley Hospital Fdn$300,000
UpValley Family Centers$300,000
Napa Cnty Resource Cons Dist$200,000
United Negro College Fund$146,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $20.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UpValley Family Centers: $447k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $436k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $400k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $400k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $350k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $350k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $350k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $300k → 9%Gunilda Rianda Senior Center: $90k → 9%American Canyon Family Resour: $333k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $580k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $510k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $400k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $400k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $400k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $375k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $375k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $300k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $240k → 9%Napa Emergency Womens Servic: $185k → 9%NEWS: $185k → 9%Mentis: $1.1M → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $835k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $835k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $735k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $635k → 9%Collabria Care: $600k → 9%Collabria Care: $500k → 9%Collabria Care: $500k → 9%Collabria Care: $500k → 9%Mentis: $450k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $400k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $350k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $350k → 9%Mentis: $325k → 9%Collabria Care: $300k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $300k → 9%Mentis: $300k → 9%Collabria Care: $300k → 9%Collabria Care: $290k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59M · 39 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
7

Total granted

$59M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+40%

Still filing today

85%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OLE HEALTH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10M · revenue +178%
  • AI
    ALDEA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +33%
  • M
    MENTIS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • QO
    QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $550k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANYON FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $333k · revenue +52%
  • F5
    First 5 Napa County
    one grant, 2017 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Parenting Institute

California parenting institute (cpi dba child parent institute) is a family resource center, serving families throughout sonoma county since 1978. our mission is to end child abuse and strengthen the health of children, parents, and…

Human Services
2
Novato Parents Nursery School Inc

To deliver affordable, reliable, and safe child care in a nurturing environment, partnering with parents in the education and development of their children and serving the community as one family

Education
3
Sierra Nevada Childrens Services

Sierra Nevada Children's Services enhances the community by supporting quality childcare and empowering families to aspire to life-long success.

Human Services
4
Seneca Family of Agencies

To help children and families through the most difficult times of their lives, regardless of the challenges or circumstances they face.

—
5
North Bay Childrens Center Inc

North Bay Childrens Center provides comprehensive high-quality childcare and early education programs fueled by our vision of excellence and a spirit of innovation. Our mission is to assure optimal development for every child we serve.

Human Services
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County

We are a catalyst of equitable transformation, aligning partners and resources to implement values-based, data-driven, community-led solutions that help families reach their full potential. our vision - we see sonoma county transformed…

Community Improvement
8
Family Care Network Inc

The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.

—
9
Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County

The child abuse prevention council (capc) strives to promote the safety of children and prevent child abuse by raising community awareness, educating our community and providing resources and support to families.

Community Improvement
10
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
11
Northcoast Childrens Services Inc

The NCS Vision: To nurture and empower the whole child and family, to enhance our quality of life, and create a more peaceful community.

Education
12
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Napa Valley; the most unlike its peers is St Helena Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/43
Grantees still filing
33/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALDEA INC: $4,440,000 · Human ServicesALDEA INCMENTIS: $3,725,000 · Human ServicesMENTISON THE MOVE: $3,340,340 · Human ServicesON THE MOVEUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $3,033,000 · Human ServicesUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTYCOLLABRIA CARE: $2,990,000 · Human ServicesCOLLABRIA CARENEWS: $1,590,000 · Human ServicesNEWS+5 more: $1,813,333 · Human Services+5 moreOLE HEALTH: $10,237,500 · HealthOLE HEALTHSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $2,215,000 · HealthSt Helena Hospital FoundationQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,050,000 · HealthQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER…COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC: $1,595,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA C…Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $1,325,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo I…NAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $910,000 · Health+2 more: $650,000 · HealthNAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,155,500 · OtherNAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOU…BOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY: $2,425,000 · OtherBOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOY…NAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALLEY PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION): $1,675,000 · OtherNAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALL…Napa Valley Unif School Dist: $1,496,315 · OtherNapa Valley Unif School D…Community Resources for Children: $1,495,000 · OtherCommunity Resources for C…Napa Resource Conservation: $550,000 · OtherQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $550,000 · OtherTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION: $1,200,000 · OtherTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIRE…+12 more: $1,685,142 · Other+12 moreCope Family Center: $2,387,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyCHILD START INC: $700,000 · EducationAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL: $555,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $370,000 · Education10000 DEGREES: $358,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC: $1,400,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY: $400,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$20,931,673Health$18,982,500Other$14,231,957Crime & Legal$2,387,000Philanthropy$2,000,000Education$1,983,000Youth Development$1,800,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLE HEALTH: $10,237,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetALDEA INC: $4,440,000 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetMENTIS: $3,725,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetON THE MOVE: $3,340,340 over 8y, 14% of budgetNAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,155,500 over 5y, 60% of budgetUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $3,033,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetCOLLABRIA CARE: $2,990,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY: $2,425,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetCope Family Center: $2,387,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $2,215,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,050,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $2,000,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALLEY PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION): $1,675,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC: $1,595,000 over 7y, 30% of budgetNEWS: $1,590,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetCommunity Resources for Children: $1,495,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC: $1,400,000 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $1,325,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION: $1,200,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $910,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetCHILD START INC: $700,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center: $625,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetGunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center: $615,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL: $555,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $550,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $450,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCASA A VOICE FOR CHILDREN: $420,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY: $400,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetPEDIATRIC DENTAL INITIATIVE OF THE NORTH COAST INC: $375,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $370,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $370,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budget10000 DEGREES: $358,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of the North Bay Inc: $120,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNIMBUS ARTS: $60,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANYON COMMUNITY & PARKS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWINE UNIFY: $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …McNabb FoundationPeter a & Vernice H G…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Craig and Kathryn Hal…The California Wellne…Queen of the Valley M…St Joseph Health Nort…The Doering Family Fo…E Richard Jones Famil…Syar Foundation Susan…Marin Community Found…
Community Foundation of the Napa ValleyCA63.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · McNabb Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Queen of the Valley Medical Center · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · The Doering Family Foundation · E Richard Jones Family Foundation Mr E Richard Jones · Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director · Marin Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Napa Valley Vintners Healthy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home