Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Nailba Charitable Foundation

The mission of the NAILBA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION is to encourage volunteerism among nailba members and provide grant funds to worthy charitable organizations that serve to enhance the quality of life for those in need of help, with a special emphasis on children.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$377kHealth$275kYouth Development$126kRecreation & Sports$89kEducation$82kHousing & Shelter$75kCrime & Legal$50kCommunity Improvement$49kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $67,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $155,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $87,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$7,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$250k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOU'RE NOT ALONE$20,000
THE WOODY FOUNDATION INC DBA THE WAY FORWARD FOUNDATION$15,000
SOUTHERN ANOKA COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE (SACA)$7,500
FOSTER TOGETHER MN$7,250
BRIDGES TO BASICS$6,000
RAINBOWS FOR KIDS$6,000
FAMILY PROMISE IN ANOKA COUNTY$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $349k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Wounded Warriors Family Support: $45k → 12%KAITLYN'S KLOSET MN: $18k → 6%WISHES & MORE: $20k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $18k → 7%Jester & Pharley Phund: $6k → 14%Hinds Hospice Fresno Survivors of S: $250 → 19%Songs of Love Foundation: $10k → 13%Reset Mentoring: $16k → 10%THE FORMATION PROJECT: $20k → 12%OUR MOTHER'S HOME OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $25k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS INC: $10k → 13%Child Serve Foundation: $250 → 10%Susan B Anthony Project: $250 → 9%Childhelp: $10k → 12%Miracle League Greater New Orleans: $5k → 23%FOSTER TOGETHER MN: $7k → 6%FAMILY PROMISE IN ANOKA COUNTY: $6k → 7%BRIDGES TO BASICS: $6k → 11%Jewish Relief Agency: $8k → 7%The Quest for Grace Foundation: $30k → 7%Out Mothers Home of SW FL: $8k → 11%FITGirl Inc: $250 → 12%Elk River Timber Bay: $13k → 11%Jewish Relief Agency: $5k → 7%Our Mother's Home of Southwest Florida: $15k → 11%Marian Center School and Services: $10k → 15%Family Matters JAFCO Support Networ: $5k → 7%JAFCO: $250 → 7%MIAMI DIAPER BANK INC: $8k → 15%Kids 4 Kids Inc: $10k → 15%Caring for Kids: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
SD
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$470k · 18 repeat orgs$783k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
75

Total granted

$470k
$721k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OM
    OUR MOTHER'S HOME OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +171%
  • AH
    Ark House Foundation
    4× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +58%
  • CO
    Childrens Oncology Services Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue +13%
  • TQ
    THE QUEST FOR GRACE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -46% · 34% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CARUSO FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childkind Inc

Childkind's mission is to empower families caring for children involved with the child welfare system, specializing in those with special health care and developmental needs. whether it be a child with a complex medical or developmental…

—
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Pathway Caring for Children

Our mission is to help children and families realize the possibilities of their lives through foster care, adoption, and mental health. we serve over 1,700 children and families in 14 northeast ohio counties.

Health
4
All for Kids Organization

This year, all for kids provided 70,000 at-risk children and parents living in los angeles and orange counties with services that include school readiness, parenting classes, family resource centers, support groups, mental health…

Human Services
5
The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services
6
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
7
Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they concentrate on what is most important - fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports
8
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
9
Focus On Youth Inc

Improve lives by providing trauma-responsive foster care, adoption, and behavioral health services that promote permanency, safety, and well-being for youth and families.

Human Services
10
Childnet Youth & Family Services

To provide safe homes, education and counseling to vulnerable children and families. the program philosophy reinforces personal responsibility and emphasizes the need for a strong family unit.

Human Services
11
Child Link Inc

Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…

Human Services
12
Chasin a Dream Foundation Inc

To provide individualized, life changing assistance to families with children battling cancer, cystic fibrosis, and other life threatening illnesses.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childserve Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Zadek Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyElementary Literacy TutoringJewish Community Organizati…Community Food PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsDomestic Violence ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsYouth Development ServicesFood Banks and PantriesYouth Mentoring Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/99
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,466

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/93
Grantees still filing
61/93
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OUR MOTHER'S HOME OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $47,500 · Human ServicesOUR MOTHER'S HOME OF SOUTHWEST F…WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT …JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY — $30,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH RELIEF AGENCYTHE QUEST FOR GRACE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE QUEST FOR GRACE FOUNDATIONTHE FORMATION PROJECT — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE FORMATION PROJECTWISHES & MORE — $20,000 · Human ServicesWISHES & MOREKAITLYNS KLOSET MN — $18,000 · Human ServicesRESET MENTORING — $16,000 · Human ServicesCARING FOR KIDS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION — $13,375 · Human Services+18 more — $94,250 · Human Services+18 morePediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc — $45,000 · HealthPediatric Brain Tumo…CANCER KISS MY COOLEY — $40,000 · HealthCANCER KISS MY COOLE…Childrens Oncology Services Inc — $39,500 · HealthChildrens Oncology S…YOU'RE NOT ALONE — $20,000 · HealthYOU'RE NOT ALONEDOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA — $20,000 · HealthDOWN SYNDROME CONNEC…RAINBOWS FOR KIDS — $16,000 · HealthRAINBOWS FOR KIDSSEANY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthSEANY FOUNDATION+8 more — $32,750 · Health+8 moreMauzy Foundation — $21,389 · OtherMauzy FoundationGENESEE AREA UNIT MI — $20,000 · OtherGENESEE AREA UNIT MION EAGLES WINGS MINISTRIES — $20,000 · OtherON EAGLES WINGS MINISTRIESCARING FOR KIDS INC — $19,500 · OtherCARING FOR KIDS INCSalina AM Chapter of National AMBUCS Inc — $17,500 · OtherROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $15,000 · OtherCORNERHOUSE — $15,000 · OtherMAMA'S KITCHEN — $25,000 · OtherMAMA'S KITCHENNATIONAL AMBUCS INC — $20,000 · OtherNATIONAL AMBUCS INCACTION 169 — $20,000 · OtherACTION 169TIME ON THE WATER — $12,000 · Other+22 more — $130,250 · Other+22 moreArk House Foundation — $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CARUSO FAMILY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCARUSO FAMILY CHARITIES — $10,500 · PhilanthropySECURITY MUTUAL LIFE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyJAMIE'S DREAM TEAM — $6,000 · PhilanthropyThe Woody Foundation Inc dba The Way Forward Foundation — $6,000 · PhilanthropyREADY READERS — $27,500 · EducationSCHOLARS' HOPE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationNAPERVILLE YOUTH CLUB — $20,000 · EducationThe Foundation of Bonita Naples Rotary INC — $14,000 · EducationDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationOpportunity Inc of Palm Beach County — $5,000 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsCAN PLAY — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsALLPLAY FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · Recreation & SportsWORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $250 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INC — $16,908 · Youth DevelopmentMADISON READING PROJECT INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentWOODY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGLASSROOTS INC — $10,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$364,625Health$228,250Other$335,639Philanthropy$97,500Education$96,750Recreation & Sports$73,250Youth Development$56,908

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOUR MOTHER'S HOME OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $47,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc — $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCANCER KISS MY COOLEY — $40,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetArk House Foundation — $40,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc — $39,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY — $30,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE QUEST FOR GRACE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetREADY READERS — $27,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CARUSO FAMILY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMAMA'S KITCHEN — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FORMATION PROJECT — $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetYOU'RE NOT ALONE — $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSCHOLARS' HOPE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA — $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWISHES & MORE — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL AMBUCS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetACTION 169 — $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetNAPERVILLE YOUTH CLUB — $20,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetCAN PLAY — $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCARING FOR KIDS INC — $19,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetKAITLYNS KLOSET MN — $18,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetALLPLAY FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSalina AM Chapter of National AMBUCS Inc — $17,500 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN MINISTRIES INC — $16,908 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRESET MENTORING — $16,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetRAINBOWS FOR KIDS — $16,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetSEANY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMADISON READING PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARING FOR KIDS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOODY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCORNERHOUSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Foundation of Bonita Naples Rotary INC — $14,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION — $13,375 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTIME ON THE WATER — $12,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetCARUSO FAMILY CHARITIES — $10,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDHELP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLASSROOTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECURITY MUTUAL LIFE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS 4 KIDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetCAPPER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hundred Movement Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard M Schulze…The H Glenn Sample Jr…Commerce Bancshares F…Connexus Energy Found…Xcel Energy FoundationThe Miami Foundation …Mightycause Charitabl…United Way WorldwideCh Robinson Worldwide…McKesson Foundation I…The Blackbaud Giving …Edward Jones Foundati…
The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN17× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The H Glenn Sample Jr Md Memorial Fund · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Connexus Energy Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nailba Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Youth and Family Services Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Glassroots Inc — 5% of income from government
  • The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines