· Private foundation
Connexus Energy Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k124 grants · $244k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $133k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WARGO NATURE CENTER - ANOKA COUNTY PARKS | $25,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY - HEATSHARE | $20,000 |
| THE FOOD GROUP | $15,000 |
| ALEXANDRA HOUSE | $12,500 |
| HOPE 4 YOUTH | $10,250 |
| ANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| INITIATIVE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SHERBURNE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE | $10,000 |
| TREE TRUST | $10,000 |
| MINNESOTA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ANOKA HENNEPIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $8,000 |
| ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| GREAT RIVER GREENING | $6,500 |
| BLAINE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM | $6,000 |
| HOPE FOR THE COMMUNITY | $5,383 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
151 repeat relationships — 78 still active in FY2025, 73 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHALEXANDRA HOUSE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $89k · revenue +16%
- ATANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $79k · revenue +110%
- H4HOPE 4 Youth6× · 2020–2025 · $71k · revenue +685%
Funded once
- ACANOKA COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $31k
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSS - MINNESOTA-DAKOTAS REGIONone grant, 2020 · $15k
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSS - GREATER MSP CHAPTERone grant, 2021 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
MinnPost produces independent journalism to serve as a trusted guide for Minnesotans exploring the critical issues, challenges and opportunities facing our state.
Mn350 unites minnesotans with the global movement to end the pollution damaging our climate, speed the transition to clean energy, and create a just and healthy future for all.
The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
Protect Minnesota promotes a culture of health and safety for all Minnesotans by preventing gun violence through research education advocacy and community investment. We emphasize prevention using a public health model and we seek to build…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The Minnesota Children's Alliance leads the development and growth of locally based children's advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to ensure equitable access to services for healing and growth.
Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Youthprise is a nonprofit intermediary that invests in the future of Minnesota by investing in youth. Youthprise's mission is to increase equity with and for Minnesota's indigenous, low-income, and racially diverse youth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Independent School District No 15 Select Hra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
192 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 192 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE 4 Youth ↗
- Who funds ANOKA HENNEPIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Tree Trust ↗
- Who funds ANOKA-RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mental Wellness Campaign for Anoka County Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR THE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA STATE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds NORTH ANOKA COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF ↗
- Who funds COON RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ↗
- Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVER GREENING ↗
- Who funds MERCY AND UNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTENNIAL COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF ↗
- Who funds ANOKA COUNTY BROTHERHOOD COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IMPACT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONE EMERGENCY HOUSING ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RUM RIVER ART INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
- Who funds DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SHERBURNE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTENNIAL AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FIRST COMMUNITY OF PROMISE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Graco Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Edina Realty Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Allina Health System · The Minneapolis Foundation · Walter C Rasmussen - Northeast Bank Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Ramsey Lions Club · Bame Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Connexus Energy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Connexus Energy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Connexus Energy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.