Skip to content
Nagel Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Nagel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$102kEnvironment$30kHealth$20kPhilanthropy$8kRecreation & Sports$7kAnimals$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$1,025
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$70,000
JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST$10,000
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK$5,500
RALLY FOUNDATION FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER RESEARCH$5,176
LAKE FOREST COLLEGE$5,000
RIVERBEND PROJECT$3,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$2,500
TETON COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE FOUNDATION$1,025
COOMBS FOUNDATION$705
PAWS OF JACKSON HOLE$512
WILSON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$500
JACKSON HOLE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$500
TETON VALLEY TRAILS & PATHWAYS$500
DILWORTH CENTER$500
CORNELL LAB OF ORINTHOLOGY$245
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TETON VALLEY TRAILS & PATHWAYS: $500 → 7%ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%ZACHARY WOODARD FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $70k → 11%CORNELL LAB OF ORINTHOLOGY: $245 → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA PARENT PHILANTHROPY: $2k → 17%DILWORTH CENTER: $500 → 10%ATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%RALLY FOUNDATION FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER RESEARCH: $5k → 13%EAST LAKE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $3k → 7%LAKE FOREST COLLEGE: $5k → 8%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $500 → 7%WILSON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $500 → 5%TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $15k → 11%DILWORTH CENTER: $500 → 10%RALLY FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%ASTORIA PARK CONSERVANCY: $10k → 5%DILWORTH CENTER: $500 → 10%RALLY FOUNDATION FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER RESEARCH: $3k → 13%JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $10k → 5%GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK: $6k → 5%JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $5k → 5%RIVERBEND PROJECT: $3k → 5%GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $3k → 5%GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $3k → 5%TETON COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE FOUNDATION: $1k → 5%TETON COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE FOUNDATION: $1k → 5%RIVERBEND PROJECT: $1k → 5%GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1k → 5%JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $1k → 5%COOMBS FOUNDATION: $705 → 5%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $500 → 5%TETON COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE FOUNDATION: $500 → 5%JACKSON HOLE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $500 → 5%WOMENTUM: $200 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
WY
PA
CA
VA
NC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 7 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$128k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+22%

Still filing today

86%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEnvironmentAnimalsEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST
    3× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +31%
  • RF
    RALLY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +48%
  • GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • EL
    EAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -53%
  • AP
    Astoria Park Conservancy
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
2
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
3
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
6
Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust

To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.

Environment
7
The Minnesota Camp Fire Foundation

Ensure camp fire minnesota's strong future. with nature as the catalyst, camp fire minnesota energizes youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.

Youth Development
8
Jefferson National Parks Association

Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.

Arts & Culture
9
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
10
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
11
Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance

The mission of the jackson hole conservation alliance is to protect the wildlife, wild places and community character of jackson hole.

Environment
12
Truckee Trails Foundation Inc

The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole; the most unlike its peers is Zachary Woodard Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
10/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $85,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONLake Forest College: $5,000 · EducationLake Forest CollegeRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $12,836 · PhilanthropyRALLY FOUNDATION IN…EAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyEAST LAKE FOUNDATIO…GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON NATIONA…+3 more: $1,700 · Philanthropy+3 moreJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $16,000 · EnvironmentJACKSON HOLE LAND…Astoria Park Conservancy: $10,000 · EnvironmentAstoria Park Cons…+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK: $5,500 · OtherGRAND TETON…RIVERBEND PROJECT: $4,000 · OtherRIVERBEND P…University of Michigan: $3,000 · OtherUniversity …UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA PARENT PHILANTHROPY: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY …The Doug Coombs Foundation: $705 · Other+6 more: $2,745 · Other+6 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · HealthDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency: $1,500 · HealthAnimal Adoption Center Inc: $2,731 · AnimalsPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES: $512 · AnimalsJACKSON HOLE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $500 · AnimalsTeton County Search & Rescue Foundation: $2,525 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$90,000Philanthropy$30,536Environment$26,500Other$17,950Health$4,000Animals$3,743Public Safety & Disaster$2,525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $12,836 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAstoria Park Conservancy: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc: $2,731 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTeton County Search & Rescue Foundation: $2,525 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDilworth Center for Chemical Dependency: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZACHARY WOODARD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Doug Coombs Foundation: $705 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTETON VALLEY TRAILS & PATHWAYS INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Meb Maintaining Excellent Balance Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJACKSON HOLE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY TENNIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENTUM INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nagel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nagel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nagel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home