Skip to content
Nadine N Moseley Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Nadine N Moseley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$421kEducation$335kHuman Services$120kPhilanthropy$65kArts & Culture$48kHousing & Shelter$23kEnvironment$15kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$82,500
Room To Grow$35,000
Providence Tarzana Foundation$20,000
City of Hope$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Breaking Through The Lens$5,000
Jacksonville Community Center$5,000
Pasadena Humane Society$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Harbor House: $10k → 10%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $25k → 14%Room To Grow: $35k → 28%Harbor House: $5k → 10%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%Room To Grow: $10k → 28%Harbor House: $5k → 10%HOMELESS HEALTHCARE LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%Jacksonville Community Center: $5k → 13%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%Hearts With A Mission: $8k → 13%Hearts With A Mission: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OR
WY
CA
HI
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$587k · 10 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$587k
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+13%

Still filing today

60%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $155k · revenue +72%
  • HH
    Homeless Health Care Los Angeles
    4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +220%
  • HH
    HARBOR HOUSE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +23%
  • PS
    Pu'ukumu School
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • LS
    LSU Student Film Program
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kaua'i Medical Clinic

Kaua'i medical clinic, an affliate of hawai'i pacific health, is a multi-specialty clinic dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region in partnership with kapi'olani medical center…

Health
2
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
3
Hamakua Health Center Inc

To achieve an extraordinary, comprehensive primary health care experience which exceeds expectation.

Health
4
Horizon House

Purposeful living in a diverse community. using the power of resident driven community to enhance wellbeing.

Human Services
5
Hawaii Pacific University

Hawaii pacific university is an international learning community set in the rich cultural context of hawaii. students from around the world join us for an american education built on a liberal arts foundation. our innovative undergraduate…

Education
6
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
7
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

Community hospital of the monterey peninsula is dedicated to identifying and meeting the changing healthcare needs of the people of the monterey peninsula and surrounding communities.we are committed to providing high-quality services at a…

Health
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Pih Health Whittier Hospital

Mission: we provide high quality healthcare without discrimination, and contribute to the health and well-being of our communities in an ethical, safe, and fiscally prudent manner in recognition of our charitable purpose.

Health
11
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
12
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $241,000 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPu'ukumu School: $20,000 · OtherLSU Student Film Program: $20,000 · OtherCity of Hope: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $49,000 · Other+10 morePOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $155,000 · EducationPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $140,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNI…Homeless Health Care Los Angeles: $60,000 · Human ServicesHomeless Health…ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesROOM TO GROW NA…HARBOR HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesHARBOR HOUSEHEARTS WITH A MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesHEARTS WITH A M…JACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $70,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEA…Eisenhower Medical Center: $50,000 · HealthEisenhower Med…HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $65,400 · PhilanthropyTHE WONDERSEED FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Arts & CultureBREAKING THROUGH THE LENS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST: $10,000 · Environment
Other$390,000Education$295,000Human Services$140,000Health$130,000Philanthropy$65,400Arts & Culture$10,500Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $155,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $65,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Health Care Los Angeles: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPu'ukumu School: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE: $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHEARTS WITH A MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WONDERSEED FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBREAKING THROUGH THE LENS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetEarth School Hawaii: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANAINA HOU COMMUNITY PARK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FAMILY FARMS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Conrad N Hilton Found…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Conrad N Hilton FoundationCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nadine N Moseley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nadine N Moseley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Hearts With a Mission: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nadine N Moseley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nadine N Moseley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nadine N Moseley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home