Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nadine N Moseley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$421kEducation$335kHuman Services$120kPhilanthropy$65kArts & Culture$48kHousing & Shelter$23kEnvironment$15kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$82,500
Room To Grow$35,000
Providence Tarzana Foundation$20,000
City of Hope$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Jacksonville Community Center$5,000
Breaking Through The Lens$5,000
Pasadena Humane Society$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Harbor House: $10k → 10%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $25k → 14%Room To Grow: $35k → 28%Harbor House: $5k → 10%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%Room To Grow: $10k → 28%Harbor House: $5k → 10%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%Jacksonville Community Center: $5k → 13%HOMELESS HEALTHCARE LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%Hearts With A Mission: $8k → 13%Hearts With A Mission: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OR
WY
CA
HI
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$587k · 10 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$587k
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+13%

Still filing today

60%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $155k · revenue +72%
  • HH
    Homeless Health Care Los Angeles
    4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +220%
  • HH
    HARBOR HOUSE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +23%
  • PS
    Pu'ukumu School
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • LS
    LSU Student Film Program
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kaua'i Medical Clinic

Kaua'i medical clinic, an affliate of hawai'i pacific health, is a multi-specialty clinic dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region in partnership with kapi'olani medical center…

Health
2
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
3
Hamakua Health Center Inc

To achieve an extraordinary, comprehensive primary health care experience which exceeds expectation.

Health
4
Horizon House

Purposeful living in a diverse community. using the power of resident driven community to enhance wellbeing.

Human Services
5
Hawaii Pacific University

Hawaii pacific university is an international learning community set in the rich cultural context of hawaii. students from around the world join us for an american education built on a liberal arts foundation. our innovative undergraduate…

Education
6
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
7
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

Community hospital of the monterey peninsula is dedicated to identifying and meeting the changing healthcare needs of the people of the monterey peninsula and surrounding communities.we are committed to providing high-quality services at a…

Health
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Pih Health Whittier Hospital

Mission: we provide high quality healthcare without discrimination, and contribute to the health and well-being of our communities in an ethical, safe, and fiscally prudent manner in recognition of our charitable purpose.

Health
11
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
12
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $241,000 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPu'ukumu School — $20,000 · OtherLSU Student Film Program — $20,000 · OtherCity of Hope — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · Other+10 more — $49,000 · Other+10 morePOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL — $155,000 · EducationPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $140,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNI…Homeless Health Care Los Angeles — $60,000 · Human ServicesHomeless Health…ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesROOM TO GROW NA…HARBOR HOUSE — $20,000 · Human ServicesHARBOR HOUSEHEARTS WITH A MISSION — $10,000 · Human ServicesHEARTS WITH A M…JACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER — $5,000 · Human ServicesPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $70,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEA…Eisenhower Medical Center — $50,000 · HealthEisenhower Med…HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,400 · PhilanthropyTHE WONDERSEED FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Arts & CultureBREAKING THROUGH THE LENS — $5,000 · Arts & CultureWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST — $10,000 · Environment
Other$390,000Education$295,000Human Services$140,000Health$130,000Philanthropy$65,400Arts & Culture$10,500Environment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL — $155,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Health Care Los Angeles — $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPu'ukumu School — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE — $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHEARTS WITH A MISSION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WONDERSEED FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBREAKING THROUGH THE LENS — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetEarth School Hawaii — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANAINA HOU COMMUNITY PARK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FAMILY FARMS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Conrad N Hilton FoundationCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nadine N Moseley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 51%
  • Hearts With a Mission51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nadine N Moseley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nadine N Moseley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph