Skip to content
My Good Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

My Good Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.0M
Granted FY2022
23
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+5 grants · $4.8M
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$797k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY$2,500,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,000,000
CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION$600,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$500,000
GLYNWOOD CENTER$250,000
WAVE HILL$200,000
HAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL$150,000
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$150,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$145,000
TRACY AVIARY$100,000
INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION$55,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
SCIENCE MOAB$50,000
SCENIC HUDSON$50,000
DUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL$50,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 10%TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $500k → 10%GLYNWOOD CENTER: $250k → 6%SCENIC HUDSON: $50k → 9%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $20k → 16%OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%WAVE HILL: $200k → 28%THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2.5M → 14%INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION: $55k → 9%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $1.0M → 8%SCIENCE MOAB: $50k → 11%RIVERS EDGE WEST: $40k → 11%CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION: $600k → 12%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $150k → 6%DUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL: $50k → 9%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $145k → 8%FRIENDS OF ARCHES & CANYONLAND: $15k → 11%HAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL: $150k → 8%ARTSPACE: $25k → 8%UTAH OPEN LANDS: $25k → 8%TRACY AVIARY: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
WI
NY
CA
UT
CO
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
3
Teton Regional Land Trust Inc

The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.

Environment
4
Swan Valley Connections

Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.

Environment
5
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
10
The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation

The conservation fund is in the business of conservation, creating innovative solutions that drive nature-based action for climate protection, sustainable economies and vibrant communities.

Environment
11
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
12
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wilderness Society; the most unlike its peers is Riversedge West. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2,500,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETYConservation Lands Foundation: $600,000 · EnvironmentConservation Lands FoundationTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $500,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDWAVE HILL INCORPORATED: $200,000 · Environment+6 more: $155,000 · EnvironmentRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $1,000,000 · HealthRonald McDonald Ho…HAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $150,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $150,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $100,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · AnimalsTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $145,000 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherARTSPACE: $25,000 · OtherCORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ARCHES & CANYONLAND: $15,000 · OtherGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $250,000 · Public BenefitSCIENCE MOAB ENGAGEMENT INITIATIVE: $50,000 · EducationDUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL: $50,000 · Education
Environment$3,955,000Health$1,000,000Animals$455,000Other$255,000Public Benefit$250,000Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2,500,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $1,000,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetConservation Lands Foundation: $600,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $500,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLYNWOOD CENTER INC: $250,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetWAVE HILL INCORPORATED: $200,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $150,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $145,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSCIENCE MOAB ENGAGEMENT INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetDUTCHESS DAY SCHOOL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRIVERSEDGE WEST: $40,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetARTSPACE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSAVE THE WORLDS RIVERS FKA SAVE THE COLORADO: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Palladium FoundationThe Walbridge FundPatagoniaorgThe Community Foundat…Willard L Eccles Char…David Kelby Johnson M…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Pacificorp Foundation…The Nature ConservancyThe Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…
Palladium FoundationUT30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Palladium Foundation · The Walbridge Fund · Patagoniaorg · The Community Foundation of Utah · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · The Nature Conservancy · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization My Good Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from My Good Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to My Good Fund?

    Find your warmest path to My Good Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on My Good’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home