Skip to content

· Private foundation

Music Matters Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
59
Grants FY2024still arriving
26
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.0MCommunity Improvement$216kYouth Development$189kHousing & Shelter$162kHealth$70kFood & Nutrition$43kEmployment$26kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $222k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $742k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
26
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARLOR ROOM$50,000
ROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION$45,000
BLUE JAY LISTENING ROOM$40,000
DRKMTTR COLLECTIVE LLC$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
LOST CHURCH$40,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
LA PENA CULTURAL CENTER$35,000
GRAND VISION FOUNDATION$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
ONE LONGFELLOW SQUARE INC$35,000
JALOPY THEATRE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
WSLR INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE STRAITJACKET LLC: $40k → 11%47 PALMER INC: $40k → 8%PARLOR ROOM: $50k → 12%IVY ROOM: $50k → 10%MINT: $45k → 14%CAFFE LENA INC: $40k → 7%BRONX MUSIC HERITAGE CENTER: $40k → 28%DEVIL'S BACKBONE TAVERN: $30k → 7%BOSSA BISTRO: $30k → 14%WSLR INC: $30k → 9%BLUE JAY LISTENING ROOM: $40k → 14%JAZZ ST LOUIS: $30k → 21%MUSONICS LLC: $30k → 10%CACTUS CLUB: $42k → 17%D SQUARED PRODUCTIONS INC: $30k → 10%THE MUSE PERFORMANCE SPACE: $30k → 12%58 GROUP INC: $25k → 17%SUNSET TAVERN: $50k → 9%ZENBARN: $30k → 9%ONE LONGFELLOW SQUARE INC: $35k → 7%CHRIS'S JAZZ CAFE: $35k → 22%RAVEN AND THE BOW LLC: $40k → 10%BIG SODA LLC: $30k → 11%GRAND VISION FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%RAG INC: $35k → 14%ROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION: $45k → 12%FSO LLC: $40k → 11%MAPLE LEAF BAR: $45k → 23%LA PENA CULTURAL CENTER: $35k → 10%CASBAH INC: $50k → 11%JAZZ GALLERY: $50k → 17%SOSA AND ZUCO LLC: $40k → 20%SONGBYRD MUSIC HOUSE: $50k → 14%BARS WE LIKE INC: $40k → 9%ISSUE PROJECT ROOM: $40k → 17%DRKMTTR COLLECTIVE LLC: $40k → 14%JALOPY THEATRE: $30k → 20%KS KLUB LLC: $30k → 17%ASHKENAZ MUSIC AND DANCE CO: $40k → 10%FREMONT ABBEY ARTS CENTER: $35k → 9%BLACK CAT HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC: $50k → 10%LOST CHURCH: $40k → 10%HARMONY HOSPITALITY LLC: $30k → 14%TATU LLC: $50k → 17%ROYAL ROOM: $40k → 9%BOGEY DEPOT INC: $50k → 17%SUBTERRANEAN: $50k → 14%HIDEOUT: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 54 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
128

Total granted

$2.0M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+29%

Still filing today

26%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $485k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CAFFE LENA INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $80k · revenue +72%
  • TJ
    THE JAZZ GALLERY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $64k · revenue +173%
  • TI
    THELOSTCHURCHORG INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $62k · revenue +248%

Funded once

  • S
    SUBTERRANEAN
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • TL
    TATU LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rootstock Arts

Foster professional development of creative artists

Arts & Culture
2
Blue Curtain a Nj NonProfit Corporation

Entertainment

Arts & Culture
3
Artists and Musicians in Recovery
Education
4
Occidental Center for the Arts

Occidental Center for the Arts exists to provide a welcoming and accessible venue for the performing and visual arts in Sonoma County California for local regional national and international artists. our mission is to enrich our community…

Arts & Culture
5
Turnmusic Corp

TURNmusic supports innovative, living music creators and celebrates their craft. From chamber music and improvisation to jazz, electronics and more, our concerts are built with a commitment to representation, diversity and originality.…

Arts & Culture
6
Cedar City Music Arts Association

Music & arts performances

Arts & Culture
7
Constellation Performing Arts

Constellation is a performing arts presenter with an emphasis on forward- thinking practices, particularly in the areas of jazz, improvised, experimental, and contemporary classical music.

Arts & Culture
8
State of the Arts Productions
Arts & Culture
9
Arlington Music Hall

To promote and produce Public Art for the enjoyment of the community and for the economic benefit of the community.

Arts & Culture
10
Wind River Valley Artist Guild
—
11
The Tank Ltd

The Tank is a small, Manhattan-based non-profit arts presenter and producer serving emerging artists. Our goal is to remove economic barriers from the creation of new work for artists launching their careers or experimenting within their…

Arts & Culture
12
Studio At 550

Provided arts programming including performances and artist support.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Traditions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dance Elixir. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
27/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+166 more: $3,113,950 · Other+166 moreCAFFE LENA INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureCAFFE LENA INCTHE JAZZ GALLERY: $64,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JAZZ GALLERYTHELOSTCHURCHORG INC: $62,000 · Arts & CultureTHELOSTCHURCHORG INCThe Parlor Room: $60,000 · Arts & CultureThe Parlor RoomISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC: $54,000 · Arts & CultureISSUE PROJECT ROOM INCROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION: $51,000 · Arts & CultureROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUN…CHOCOLATE CHURCH ARTS CENTER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCHOCOLATE CHURCH ARTS CE…Artwerks: $44,000 · Arts & CultureCactus Plus Corporation: $42,000 · Arts & CultureONE LONGFELLOW SQUARE: $41,000 · Arts & CultureLa Pea Cultural Center Inc: $41,000 · Arts & Culture47 Palmer Inc: $39,500 · Arts & CultureJAZZ ST LOUIS: $38,866 · Arts & CultureWSLR INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMuse Performance Space aka The Muse: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $143,000 · Arts & Culture+16 moreGRAND VISION FOUNDATION: $43,000 · PhilanthropyFOCAL POINT CORPORATION: $8,545 · PhilanthropyKENNETT FLASH INC: $20,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,113,950Arts & Culture$870,366Philanthropy$51,545Public Benefit$20,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAFFE LENA INC: $80,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE JAZZ GALLERY: $64,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetTHELOSTCHURCHORG INC: $62,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetThe Parlor Room: $60,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC: $54,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCHOCOLATE CHURCH ARTS CENTER: $50,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetArtwerks: $44,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetGRAND VISION FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetONE LONGFELLOW SQUARE: $41,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetLa Pea Cultural Center Inc: $41,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budget47 Palmer Inc: $39,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJAZZ ST LOUIS: $38,866 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWSLR INC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetMuse Performance Space aka The Muse: $30,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetElastic Arts Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetKENNETT FLASH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetGODFREY DANIELS: $15,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetBAY AREA JAZZ AND ARTS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetGROUNDWORKS TUCSON: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetTHE HOLLAND PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDANCE ELIXIR: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetRHIZOME DC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMakeshift: $9,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFOCAL POINT CORPORATION: $8,545 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetASOCIACION ACIRC CORP: $8,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLIVING TRADITIONS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOX VALLEY MUSIC FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEXT STAGE ARTS PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOLD SONGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MYRNA LOY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEARLVILLE OPERA HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBach Dancing and Dynamite Society Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUPPER JAY ART CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAFFE LENA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JAZZ GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds THELOSTCHURCHORG INC ↗
  • Who funds The Parlor Room ↗
  • Who funds ISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS MUSIC PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHOCOLATE CHURCH ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Artwerks ↗
  • Who funds GRAND VISION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cactus Plus Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ONE LONGFELLOW SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds La Pea Cultural Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mid Atlantic Arts IncMD14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · Chamber Music America Inc · New Music USA Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Music Matters Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Music Matters Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • 47 Palmer Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Parlor Room: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Music Matters Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Music Matters Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Music Matters’ filings →

More from the funding graph