Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Msgr P Fursey O'Toole Trust Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

54% of Msgr P Fursey O'Toole Trust Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Msgr P Fursey O'Toole Trust Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $63k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
20
11
21
7
22
3
23
4
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$93kHealth$71kRecreation & Sports$40kEducation$37kHuman Services$33kEnvironment$15kCommunity Improvement$15kPublic Benefit$13kOther$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k11 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$876k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL$10,000
TEAM SANFILIPPO FOUNDATION$10,000
EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
ESSEX CO COMM FDN FOR CC PRICE BREAST CANCER FUND$5,000
FRIENDS OF SOUTH SHORE DEVELOPMENT$5,000
SOUTH SHORE PEER RECOVERY$5,000
FRIENDS OF PUBLIC GARDEN$5,000
SCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC$5,000
JOSEPH HORVATH MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$4,000
AMERICAN LIVER FOUNDATION$2,500
RETIREMENT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS$2,500
INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF ASHAROKEN$2,500
TIEGERMAN SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC: $10k → 8%SCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC: $5k → 8%SCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS: $5k → 8%SCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC: $3k → 8%FRIENDS OF THE SCITUATE SHELTER INC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$181k · 13 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +147% since the first grant, against +70% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$181k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+147%
+70%

Still filing today

77%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    South Shore Peer Recovery Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +254%
  • EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $24k · revenue +85%
  • SC
    SCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • KM
    KELLENBERG MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +83%
  • NV
    Norwell Visiting Nurse Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +70%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
4
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
5
The Massachusetts Society for Medical Research Inc

To educate the public, media and members of the legislative, veterinary, and medical profession of medical advancement from animal research.

Health
6
University of Massachusetts Amherst Alumni Association Inc

To promote the interests of the university of massachusetts amherst through programs, services and communications that develop and reinforce the bonds between the university and its alumni; to validate the value and alumni pride in the…

7
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

9
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
12
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Esplanade Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Local Catch 143 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr21%15%10–20yr18%25%20–35yr11%35%35–55yr14%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr11%41%35–55yr14%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
10%
3,403/32,549

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $75,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITA…LOCAL CATCH 143 INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL CATCH 143 INCFRIENDS OF SOUTH SHORE DEVELOPMENT — $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SOUTH SHORE DEVELOPMENTINCORPORATED VILLAGE OF ASHAROKEN — $12,500 · OtherINCORPORATED VILLAGE OF ASHAROKENCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEAL — $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC MINISTRIES APPEALMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $10,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALKELLENBERG MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherKELLENBERG MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOLESSEX CO COMM FDN FOR CC PRICE BREAST CANCER FUND — $5,000 · OtherLOCAL CATCH — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF PUBLIC GARDEN — $5,000 · OtherNorwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc — $5,000 · OtherSANTAS HELPERS DBA CLAUS — $10,000 · OtherSANTAS HELPERS DBA CLAUSBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $5,000 · OtherESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC — $8,000 · OtherESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC+4 more — $9,000 · Other+4 moreSouth Shore Peer Recovery Inc — $25,000 · HealthSouth Shore Peer…TSF Incorporated — $12,500 · HealthTSF IncorporatedALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $7,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISE…NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $3,000 · HealthNATIONAL ALLIANC…American Liver Foundation — $2,500 · HealthEMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC — $24,000 · Recreation & SportsSCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC — $23,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE SCITUATE SHELTER INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE JOSEPH HORVATH MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $14,000 · EducationFordham University — $10,000 · EducationESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 · Philanthropy
Community Improvement$85,000Other$109,500Health$50,000Recreation & Sports$24,000Human Services$24,000Education$24,000Philanthropy$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Shore Peer Recovery Inc — $25,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetEMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC — $24,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC — $23,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSEPH HORVATH MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $14,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTSF Incorporated — $12,500 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetFordham University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTAS HELPERS DBA CLAUS — $10,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetLOCAL CATCH 143 INC — $10,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetESPLANADE ASSOCIATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIEGERMAN SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SCITUATE SHELTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Msgr P Fursey O'Toole Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • South Shore Peer Recovery Inc71% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc2% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc1% of income from government
  • Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph