Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mrhm Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$4.6MReligion$2.5MCivil Rights$328kArts & Culture$282kInternational$176kRecreation & Sports$176kFood & Nutrition$50kHuman Services$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $336k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$51,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP GRADUATE FELLOWSHIP$1,075,867
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$327,555
HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN HARBOR$78,334
HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN HARBOR$78,333
HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN HARBOR$78,333
NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC$51,000
THE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT - BNEI AKIVA OF THE UNITED STATES AND$50,000
ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC$19,550
AMERICA GIVES INC$10,000
GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION$5,000
GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION$5,000
LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC$63
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $26k → 17%CAMP OHEL INC: $28k → 13%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $24k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 11 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$6.7M
$703k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+31%

Still filing today

27%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $634k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP GRADUATE FELLOWSHIP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.8M
  • NP
    NACHSHON PROJECT GRADUATE SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1.8M
  • TN
    THE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.2M

Funded once

  • OJ
    ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $266k
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +65%
  • FA
    FRESH AIR SOCIETY DBA TAMARACK CAMPS
    one grant, 2023 · $96k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
4
American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc

To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem

Education
5
Hadar Hatorah Rabbinical College and Subsidary Machon Chana

Religious education

Education
6
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
7
Jerusalem University College

Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…

International
8
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
9
University of Judaism Foundation
—
10
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
12
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hebrew College; the most unlike its peers is Association of Chevros Kadisha Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP GRADUATE FELLOWSHIP: $2,775,532 · OtherTHE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP GRADUATE FELLOWSHIPNACHSHON PROJECT GRADUATE SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP: $1,805,000 · OtherNACHSHON PROJECT GRADUATE SCHOOL FELLOWSHIPTHE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP: $1,183,396 · OtherTHE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIPORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA: $266,475 · Other+12 more: $1,230,829 · Other+12 moreAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $327,555 · Civil RightsPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $142,550 · Arts & CultureMEOR INC: $75,000 · EducationHEBREW COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $49,943 · Human ServicesCamp Ohel Inc: $28,497 · Human ServicesISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $35,250 · HealthPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC: $26,400 · International
Other$7,261,232Civil Rights$327,555Philanthropy$160,000Arts & Culture$142,550Education$135,000Human Services$78,440Health$35,250International$26,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $327,555 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHebrew Day School of Ann Arbor: $235,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $142,550 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMEOR INC: $75,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $51,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $49,943 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $35,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCamp Ohel Inc: $28,497 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC: $26,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASSOCIATION OF CHEVROS KADISHA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Clrc Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mrhm Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mrhm Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mrhm Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mrhm Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mrhm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph