· Private foundation
Mrhm Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $336k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP GRADUATE FELLOWSHIP | $1,075,867 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $327,555 |
| HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN HARBOR | $78,334 |
| HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN HARBOR | $78,333 |
| HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN HARBOR | $78,333 |
| NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC | $51,000 |
| THE RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT - BNEI AKIVA OF THE UNITED STATES AND | $50,000 |
| ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC | $19,550 |
| AMERICA GIVES INC | $10,000 |
| GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC | $63 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $634k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTHE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP GRADUATE FELLOWSHIP2× · 2023–2024 · $2.8M
- NPNACHSHON PROJECT GRADUATE SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP2× · 2020–2021 · $1.8M
- TNTHE NACHSHON PROJECT GAP YEAR FELLOWSHIP3× · 2020–2022 · $1.2M
Funded once
- OJORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICAone grant, 2021 · $266k
- CRCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +65%
- FAFRESH AIR SOCIETY DBA TAMARACK CAMPSone grant, 2023 · $96k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious School
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem
Religious education
To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…
Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…
To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hebrew College and the most unlike its peers is Association of Chevros Kadisha Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds Hebrew Day School of Ann Arbor ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds MEOR INC ↗
- Who funds HEBREW COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Ohel Inc ↗
- Who funds PARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF CHEVROS KADISHA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Clrc Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mrhm Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mrhm Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mrhm Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.