· Private foundation
Clrc Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $66
- $10k–50k1 grant · $47k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $693k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XII LLC | $753,122 |
| CLALIT HEALTH SERVICES | $506,995 |
| CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND | $225,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $150,000 |
| SHAMOON COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING | $87,341 |
| AKIVA COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL | $83,333 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC | $77,100 |
| JEWISH BOOK TRUST INC | $70,380 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER | $46,700 |
| LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC | $66 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 61% of grant dollars ($5.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 39% that went abroad ($3.7M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 39% of all-years giving ($3.7M)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $575k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LHLEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XII LLC4× · 2021–2024 · $3.1M
- TSTHE STATE OF ISRAELMINISTRY OF HEALTHWOLFSON MEDICAL CENTER2× · 2021–2022 · $1.6M
- CHCLALIT HEALTH SERVICES4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M
Funded once
- LHLEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING XII LLC (LHP12) - THE NACHSHON PROJECTone grant, 2020 · $210k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +670%
- IHISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education
Camp ramah in northern california engages the members of our camp community in joyful, transformative experiences that serve as a model for lifelong jewish learning and practice, commitment to klal yisrael (israel and the jewish…
Camp young judaea midwest, inspires jewish children of diverse backgrounds to thrive in a joyful, tight-knit community that is passionate about israel and judaism.
Provides a summer program for jewish boys of high school age. the mission is to continue the camper's religious studies in a relaxed setting while providing recreational opportunities.
To promote religious, educational, charitable activities and to provide the facilities for the same.
Camp Solomon Schechter blends Jewish tradition and culture as the foundation of the camp experience; integrates nature and activity to create fun; and embraces the child in every person to foster joy, facilitate friendship, and create…
Camp Morasha integrates the best in informal and formal education in all of its programming and activities through a transformative and fun, co-ed, summer experience for Jewish youth. The camp inspires and develops the minds, bodies,…
The primary purpose of the organization is to operate and maintain an educational and recreational institute for adults and a summer camp for children in hopewell junction, new york that would provide opportunities to develop new skills…
The mission of ramah in the rockies is to nurture the character development of jewish youth by providing them the opportunity to challenge themselves physically, intellectually, and spiritually.
Committed to providing jewish boys with a safe, vibrant and nurturing summer environment where "friendships are built to last a lifetime". we foster values of teamwork, leadership, self-confidence and respect for one another based on…
To develop and strengthen our campers both on and off the field through sportsmanship, teamwork, achievement and responsibility.
The corporation operates a summer sleep away camp providing campers the opportunity to interact with values of judaism in daily life. the corporation converted from for-profit status to nonprofit status to better carry out charitable and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Judaea Camp Tel Yehudah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp Moshava of Wild Rose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BOOK TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Camp Ohel Inc ↗
- Who funds RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVA OF THE US AND CANADA INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Judaea Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE ↗
- Who funds EDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · Ylry Inc · Ahba Inc · Hlmh Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Lmcl Inc · Oclo Inc · Fjc · Gbrg Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clrc Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Clrc Inc?
Find your warmest path to Clrc Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.