How much did MOUNT ZION HEALTH FUND grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of MOUNT ZION HEALTH FUND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

education traveltravel blockdeptdistributionstotaled millionaccessibilityincreasing

2020

pandemic-related vulnerablevulnerable populationstelehealth healthcarehealthcare transitiontransition youthyouth developmentaldevelopmental disabilities

2021

food insecurityexpanding reachreach integrativeintegrative painmanagement telehealthlifestylebuilding trauma

2022

environmentalage selfself carecare leveragingleveraging techtech expandexpand access

2023

campus-based titleddgim campus-basedhdfccc campus-basedclinical partnershippartnership carechildren specialspecial healthcare

2024

rap-awarded campuscampus pilotpartnership ucsfresearch studyucsf meriohns pedsgaps

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k20 grants · $563k
$50k–250k15 grants · $1.5M
$250k+2 grants · $1.3M

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

$56M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$1,000,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$290,750
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$243,144
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$225,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$160,000
SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$140,000
INSTITUTE ON AGING$110,000
SAN FRANCISCO CAMPUS FOR JEWISH LIVING$100,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$82,342
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$80,000
TIDES CENTER - SHALOM BAYIT$80,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE$75,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$53,250
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$50,000
CHINESE AMERICAN COALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of MOUNT ZION HEALTH FUND’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

MOUNT ZION HEALTH FUNDlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$15M · 18 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$15M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%

+67%

Still filing today

89%

85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
3× · 2018–2023 · $4.2M · revenue +74%
IO
INSTITUTE ON AGING
7× · 2018–2024 · $807k · revenue +55%
TIDES CENTER - SHALOM BAYIT
7× · 2018–2024 · $461k · revenue +74%

Funded once

TM
THAT MAN MAY SEE INC
one grant, 2018 · $182k · revenue +15%
SF
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY CLINIC CONSORTIUMgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $130k · revenue +28%
TP
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

Inspire diverse audiences through exhibitions, education, publications & collections.

Arts & Culture

Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment

San Francisco Classical Voice

SFCV's mission is to engage audiences, artists, and arts organizations, and forge meaningful connections through music journalism.

Arts & Culture

San Francisco Challenge

Recreation & Sports

San Francisco Jewish Community

Js mission is to connect, enlighten and strengthen the multi-faceted Jewish community of Northern California and to serve as a forum for communicating news, information, ideas and opinions affecting Jews locally, (Continued top of page 2)

Education

Silicon Valley Jewish Film Festival

Bringing community together through films that show the jewish culture and traditions.

Arts & Culture

San Francisco Senior and Disability

Senior and Disability Action mobilizes and educates seniors and people with disabilities to fight for individual rights and social justice. More than 1000 people take part in our housing, health care, transit and empowerment programs each…

Unclassified

Volunteers in Medicine - San Francisco

Clinic by the bay provides free healthcare to the working uninsured in san francisco and san mateo counties. the clinic provides a caring medical home to patients through a holistic philosophy centered on compassion, wellness and dignity.

Health

San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center

Arts & Culture

Jewish Federation of Central California

The organizations primary purpose is to raise funds for distribution to jewish charitable agencies and for sick and destitute people thus part ii, column (d) expenses are included in column (b).

Philanthropy

Jewish Federation of the Sacra

To serve and enrich the Jewish community and those who support and identify with it in the greater Sacramento area, Israel, and the world.

Philanthropy

San Francisco Historical Society

To provide services to the public that enable the understanding and appreciation of the history of San Francisco.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services and the most unlike its peers is Tides Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/40

the rest of the field

10%

618/6,386

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/35

Grantees still filing

26/35

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$9,553,476Education$4,275,291Human Services$1,750,495Health$305,759Crime & Legal$150,000Housing & Shelter$145,305Philanthropy$140,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of SanCA43.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San · The San Francisco Foundation · Metta Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Koret Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · Bothin Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MOUNT ZION HEALTH FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BOARD OF RABBIS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 943248658 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NORTHERN CALIFORNIA BOARD OF RABBIS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 70% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mount Zion Health Fund?

Find your warmest path to Mount Zion Health Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MOUNT ZION HEALTH FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mount Zion Health Fund?

More from the funding graph

MOUNT ZION HEALTH FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mount Zion Health Fund?

More from the funding graph