Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mort & Brigitte Harris Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$14MEducation$3.5MYouth Development$100kPhilanthropy$31kReligion$4kCommunity Improvement$2kHousing & Shelter$1kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$921k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HENRY FORD MUSEUM$250,000
BRILLIANT DETROIT$100,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $25 → 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $20 → 11%FOCUS HOPE: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 7 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
21

Total granted

$15M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+31%

Still filing today

43%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    2× · 2018–2022 · $5.4M · revenue +34%
  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $5.4M · revenue +22%
  • TH
    THE HENRY FORD MUSEUM
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3.3M

Funded once

  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $2.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1.4M
  • NU
    Northwood University
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

6
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
9
Us Naval Academy Foundation Inc

To support, promote, and advance the mission of the naval academy.

Education
10
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
11
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
12
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $5,400,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTSDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $5,400,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC+1 more — $300 · Arts & CultureTHE HENRY FORD MUSEUM — $3,250,000 · OtherTHE HENRY FORD MUSEUMWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,000,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $1,400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRANBROOK — $600,000 · OtherCRANBROOK+13 more — $312,150 · OtherNorthwood University — $500,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $50,000 · EducationTHE NEW COMMON SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationBRILLIANT DETROIT — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBELLE ISLE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 · Community ImprovementFOCUSHOPE — $1,000 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK INC — $45 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $200 · InternationalHOMES FOR VETERANS A NJ NON PROFIT CORPORATION — $25 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$10,800,300Other$7,562,150Education$577,000Youth Development$100,000Community Improvement$2,000Human Services$1,045International$200Housing & Shelter$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $5,400,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $5,400,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNorthwood University — $500,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW COMMON SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBELLE ISLE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BASICS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUSHOPE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Army Historical Foundation Inc — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC — $45 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · Mutual of America Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mort & Brigitte Harris Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mort & Brigitte Harris Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mort & Brigitte Harris Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph