Skip to content

· Public charity

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

To increase charitable giving by providing supporting organizations with a platform through which they can make tax-deductible contributions to various charitable organizations.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

22
’17
0
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$4.4MEducation$1.8MHealth$40kEnvironment$23kCommunity Improvement$10kReligion$10kCrime & Legal$5kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,912
Median grant
1
States reached
$132k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC$12,912
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARC OF GREATER PLYMOUTH INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
IN
CA
MD
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
3
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
4
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
5
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
6
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
7
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
8
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
11
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
12
Alliant Educational Foundation

The alliant educational foundation builds bridges between under-resourced communities, universities, and other organizations to create a more equitable, healthy, and just society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Seminole State College of Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tri. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $3,432,680 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCCENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATIONCenter for Educational Innovation Inc: $1,565,531 · EducationCenter for Educational Innovat…Core-Mark Families Foundation: $65,000 · Education+3 more: $55,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $46,250 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $33,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $12,500 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $11,450 · OtherSRI GLOBAL: $5,000 · OtherAdventHealth University Inc: $5,000 · OtherTHE SOLSTICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherHEALTHY GIRLS SAVE THE WORLD: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA: $5,000 · OtherBE MEDITATION GROUP: $5,000 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · OtherELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthKISS THE GROUND: $13,000 · Food & NutritionYouth for Environmental Sanity: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRI: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSAVING INNOCENCE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF GREATER PLYMOUTH INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$4,432,680Education$1,685,531Other$138,200Health$25,000Food & Nutrition$13,000Environment$10,000Community Improvement$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $3,432,680 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Educational Innovation Inc: $1,565,531 over 1y, 18% of budgetCENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCore-Mark Families Foundation: $65,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHAPPY VALLEY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKRISHNAMURTI FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $13,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $11,450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYouth for Environmental Sanity: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE TRI: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetAdventHealth University Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVING INNOCENCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARC OF GREATER PLYMOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 95%
  • The Arc of Greater Plymouth Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Autism Society of America Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc?

Find your warmest path to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding’s filings →

More from the funding graph