Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Morgan & Judith McGrath Private Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$218kEducation$48kPhilanthropy$36kArts & Culture$22kReligion$11kInternational$7kHuman Services$6kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JP MORGAN CHASE NATL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$35,728
NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL$15,000
BILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$3,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$2,500
DOMINICAN FRIARS FOUNDATION$1,000
EMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY$1,000
RIVERSTONE HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$1,000
TWIGS$1,000
GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOUR$1,000
ARMONK INDEPENDENT FIRE DEPARTMENT$500
HOLY INNOCENTS$350
HOLY CROSS CHURCH$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRO VET US: $500 → 10%RIVERSTONE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%REGIONAL HOSPICE: $258 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Morgan & Judith McGrath Private Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 63% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Morgan & Judith McGrath Private Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$293k · 18 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
27

Total granted

$293k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+41%

Still filing today

44%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NW
    NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $177k · revenue +94%
  • TN
    THE NEW CASTLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +71%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -57%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

9
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Provetus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesJewish Community FederationsCommunity Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Government Accountability R…Land Conservation Organizat…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Hospice Care ServicesVolunteer Fire DepartmentsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%21%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%8%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%88%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,733

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $177,030 · HealthNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION+6 more — $5,750 · HealthJP MORGAN CHASE NATL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $35,728 · OtherJP MORGAN CHASE NATL PHILANTHROPIC T…JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES — $25,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INT…THE NEW CASTLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $12,500 · OtherTHE NEW CASTLE HISTORICAL SOCIETYTWIGS — $6,700 · OtherTWIGSST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH — $5,150 · OtherIESC — $5,121 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE — $5,000 · Other+30 more — $23,058 · Other+30 moreBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $29,025 · EducationBILLINGS CATH…CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationCORPORATION O…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLE…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $9,100 · Arts & CultureEMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY INC — $3,700 · Public BenefitWorld TEAM Sports — $3,545 · Recreation & SportsAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,000 · International
Health$182,780Other$118,257Education$43,025Arts & Culture$9,100Public Benefit$3,700Recreation & Sports$3,545International$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $177,030 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $29,025 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NEW CASTLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $12,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $9,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY INC — $3,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWorld TEAM Sports — $3,545 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH RENEWAL FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRiverStone Health Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC — $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL WITHIN MY HANDS — $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVETUS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSACRED HEART RETREAT HOUSE INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds BILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE NEW CASTLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds EMPIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY INC
  • Who funds World TEAM Sports
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YOUTH RENEWAL FUND
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
  • Who funds RiverStone Health Foundation
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC
  • Who funds ALL WITHIN MY HANDS
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Morgan & Judith McGrath Private Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • Regional Hospice and Home Care of Western Connecticut Inc17% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morgan & Judith McGrath Private Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Morgan & Judith McGrath Private Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph