Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moorecorpora Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$95kArts & Culture$36kRecreation & Sports$14kReligion$12kPhilanthropy$9kAnimals$9kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$283k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIU FOUNDATION$30,000
PEACE CENTER$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE$5,000
SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PR$2,500
HOPEFUL HORIZONS$2,000
HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION$2,000
GOLDEN GATE NAT PARKS CONSERVANCY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $1k → 12%PROGRAMS FOR EXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE: $1k → 10%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $1k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $1k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 12 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$141k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+104%

Still filing today

67%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +118%
  • PC
    PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +79%
  • HH
    HOPEFUL HORIZONS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • YA
    YOUNG ARTIST PERFORMANCES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
10
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
11
Southeast Kansas Community Action P

Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.

Community Improvement
12
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Safehouse Denver Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIU FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherSIU FOUNDATIONST FRANCIS ANIMAL SHELTER: $8,000 · OtherST FRANCIS ANIMAL SHELTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOWCOUNTRY: $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOWCOUNTRYLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $3,550 · OtherYOUNG ARTIST PERFORMANCES INC: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $2,500 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PR: $2,500 · Other+11 more: $12,750 · Other+11 moreSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $56,500 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $31,000 · Arts & CulturePEACE CENTER FOUND…Carbondale Community Arts Incorporated: $1,500 · Arts & CultureHOPEFUL HORIZONS: $12,000 · ReligionSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesPROGRAMS FOR EXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE: $1,000 · Human ServicesTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $2,000 · PhilanthropyHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$69,800Education$62,500Arts & Culture$32,500Religion$12,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Human Services$5,000Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $56,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEFUL HORIZONS: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $3,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGirlUp GVL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROGRAMS FOR EXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWRIGHT-WAY RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEFUL HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Carbondale Community Arts Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds GirlUp GVL ↗
  • Who funds PROGRAMS FOR EXCEPTIONAL PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds WRIGHT-WAY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moorecorpora Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moorecorpora Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Moorecorpora Private Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Moorecorpora Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moorecorpora Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph