Skip to content

· Private foundation

Monroe-Schuler Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$342kEnvironment$174kHuman Services$107kInternational$103kPhilanthropy$88kAnimals$84kArts & Culture$71kRecreation & Sports$57kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $152k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RENOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION$152,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$30,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN NEVADA$10,000
HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION$5,500
PLUMAS AUDUBON SOCIETY$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
SAFE HAVEN$2,000
NEVADA HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
MAKE A WISH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PLUMAS AUDUBON SOCIETY: $2k → 13%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%PLUMAS AUDUBON SOCIETY: $2k → 13%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%Health Network Foundation: $10k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%Health Network Foundation: $10k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD'S CLOTHES CLOSET: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MA
NV
IA
OH
CA
MO
WV
AZ
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$983k · 21 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +134% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
17

Total granted

$983k
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+20%

Still filing today

48%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    Renown Health Foundation
    4× · 2017–2024 · $201k · revenue +633%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +134%
  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $76k · revenue +329%

Funded once

  • RW
    RANSOM WEBSTER-AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $61k
  • SH
    SENECA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • BD
    BOOSTED DIPLOMASgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +138%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
2
Healthy Nevada
Health
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Unlv Research Foundation

The foundation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the purposes of supporting, promoting, and reporting research activities at the university of nevada, las vegas, as an entity of the board of regents of the nevada system of…

Science & Tech
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
7
Nevada Wildlife Federation

The Nevada Wildlife Federation is the Oldest 501(c)(3) statewide conservation organization dedicated to sustaining Nevada's wildlife through conservation and education.

Animals
8
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
9
Honnold Foundation

Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.

Environment
10
Renown Health

Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

Health
11
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nevada Women's Fund; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renown Health Foundation: $201,000 · OtherRenown Health FoundationSAFE HAVEN: $154,000 · OtherSAFE HAVENRocky Mountain Elk Foundation: $70,000 · OtherRocky Mountain Elk FoundationRANSOM WEBSTER-AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM: $61,000 · OtherRANSOM WEBSTER-AUTOMOBILE MUSEUMHAVA (Honored American Veterans Afield): $55,000 · OtherHAVA (Honored American Veterans Afield)CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherWashoe County Human Services: $40,000 · Other+21 more: $242,000 · Other+21 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $102,996 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S P…THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $45,180 · ReligionTHE EMPOWERME…HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $75,500 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD'S CLOTHES CLOSET: $10,000 · Human ServicesPLUMAS AUDUBON SOCIETY: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $34,500 · Youth DevelopmentAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHUKAR CHASERS FOUNDATION: $16,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $10,500 · PhilanthropyBOOSTED DIPLOMAS: $15,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · EducationALMANOR FISHING ASSOCIATION: $22,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$863,000Religion$148,176Human Services$91,500Youth Development$36,500Philanthropy$26,500Education$25,000Recreation & Sports$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenown Health Foundation: $201,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $102,996 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $75,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $45,180 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $34,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALMANOR FISHING ASSOCIATION: $22,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNEVADA WOMEN'S FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOOSTED DIPLOMAS: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD'S CLOTHES CLOSET: $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLUMAS AUDUBON SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN YOUTH & COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA URBAN ROOTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Renown Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds ALMANOR FISHING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA WOMEN'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHUKAR CHASERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOOSTED DIPLOMAS ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Northern Nevada ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD'S CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLUMAS AUDUBON SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Nell J Redfield FoundationNV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nell J Redfield Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Courage Sans Peur Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · The Skip Viragh Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monroe-Schuler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monroe-Schuler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Monroe-Schuler Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Monroe-Schuler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monroe-Schuler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph