· Private foundation
The Skip Viragh Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $2.6M
- $250k+25 grants · $28M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Pancreatic Cancer Action Network | $4,900,000 |
| Chaminade College Prep School | $3,750,000 |
| AppleTree Institute for Edu Innovat | $2,650,000 |
| Father Martin's Ashley | $2,000,000 |
| ICM | $2,000,000 |
| Injured Marine Semper Fi Fund | $1,750,000 |
| TAPS Tragedy Assist Program | $1,300,000 |
| Cristo Rey Network | $1,250,000 |
| Wyman Center | $1,182,103 |
| St Louis Community Foundation | $900,000 |
| Don Bosco Cristo Rey | $850,000 |
| Renown Health Foundation | $650,000 |
| City Garden Montessori School | $550,000 |
| National Association to Protect Chi | $500,000 |
| Boys Girls Club of Western NV | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $13.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
82 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $50M · revenue +24%- HUHELPING UP MISSION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $33M · revenue +83% · 53% of their budget
- SFSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +56%
Funded once
- LFLittle Flower Catholic Schoolone grant, 2022 · $3.5M
- TETHE EMPOWERMENT CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1.8M · revenue +302%
- VGVeterans Guest House Incone grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -4% · 35% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Children's services
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
Behavioral health, long-term support services, mental health therapy, substance, alcohol and drug abuse treatment as well as domestic violence offender intervention services
To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.
Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.
The mission of greater minneapolis crisis nursery is to end the abuse and neglect of children and create strong and healthy families.
St. Anns Center helps mothers and children overcome crisis and achieve lasting independence and stability by providing a safe and supportive home, child care, education and employment assistance, and clinical social work services within a…
Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guardian Angel Settlement Association and the most unlike its peers is Boys Girls Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds GO2 For Lung Cancer ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE WYMAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds Lung Cancer Alliance ↗
- Who funds Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
- Who funds CITY TEACHING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CITY GARDEN MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SURVIVOR CARE INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASHLEY INC ↗
- Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds BRISTLECONE FAMILY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Renown Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds CARE CHEST OF SIERRA NEVADA ↗
- Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association ↗
- Who funds SIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Nell J Redfield Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · Dermody Properties Foundation · Estelle J Kelsey Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Sosj Knights Hospitaller Priory of the Western USA · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Skip Viragh Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
- Marian House Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Skip Viragh Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Skip Viragh Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.