Skip to content
Mohammady Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mohammady Foundation

The primary purpose of this foundation is to engage in charitable, poverty alleviation, low income aid, educational aid, and animal welfare for the benefit of the general public, and it is not organized for the private gain of any person.

$936k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$270k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$4.4MInternational$3.6MEducation$1.6MReligion$1.5MScience & Tech$205kPhilanthropy$30kHealth$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $579k
  • $250k+1 grant · $270k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Islamic Relief USA$270,000
Sabil USA$225,000
Uplift Charity$150,000
Islamic Institute of Orange County$133,500
Individual grant recipient$70,300
Fullerton CollegeAmmar Zahid$16,052
Minaret Academy$15,000
CORE$10,000
Institute of Knowledge$10,000
Islamic Society of Orange County$5,000
The Citizen Foundation USA$5,000
UMMA Community Clinic$5,000
Fullerton Muslim Community Center$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
IslahLA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Citizen Foundation USA: $6k → 16%The Citizen Foundation USA: $5k → 16%The Citizen Foundation USA: $5k → 16%The Citizen Foundation USA: $5k → 16%CORE: $10k → 14%CORE: $5k → 14%CORE: $5k → 14%IslahLA: $5k → 14%Sabil USA: $275k → 10%UMMA Community Clinic: $5k → 14%Sabil USA: $225k → 10%UMMA Community Clinic: $3k → 14%Sabil USA: $112k → 10%Sabil USA: $220k → 10%Sabil USA: $35k → 10%Sabil USA: $125k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 18 repeat orgs$304k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$11M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+5%

Still filing today

39%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +2%
  • UC
    UPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +72% · 31% of their budget
  • SU
    Sabil USA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $992k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • US
    UCLA School of Engineering
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF FULLERTON
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • OC
    OC COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
3
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
4
The Islamic Society of Indochina

Mumanitarian support poor muslim families

Religion
5
Cambodian Islamic Foundation
Education
6
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
8
Third Pillar Islamic Charity

Third Pillar USA is a charity organization based in the United States dedicated to alleviating poverty in the local and global community. Our team comprises of passionate individuals from across the Bay Area working in various professions…

Religion
9
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture
10
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services
11
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
12
Muslimahs United

Muslimahs united was founded on islamic principles of justice, integrity, and commitment to community services. we aim to offer support, grounded in islamic practice of justice for muslim women of color, and all women who are affected by…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Muslim Medical Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $3,530,000 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USAUPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION: $3,340,000 · PhilanthropyUPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyInstitute of Knowledge: $1,230,200 · OtherInstitute of KnowledgeISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $993,000 · OtherISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF ORANGE COUN…Islamic Institute of Orange C: $437,500 · OtherIslamic Institute of Orange C+16 more: $574,523 · Other+16 moreSabil USA: $992,000 · Human ServicesSabil USA+4 more: $53,500 · Human ServicesUCLA FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationOC COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $30,000 · ReligionMuslim American Society Inc: $12,500 · ReligionISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,500 · ReligionNAEEM FOUNDATION: $5,000 · ReligionWEST COAST ISLAMIC SOCIETY: $5,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
International$3,530,000Philanthropy$3,350,000Other$3,235,223Human Services$1,045,500Education$102,000Religion$58,000Health$7,500Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $3,530,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION: $3,340,000 over 9y, 31% of budgetSabil USA: $992,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOC COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetISLAH LA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAEEM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetWEST COAST ISLAMIC SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDANCE COLLEGE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT CHARITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Sabil USA ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OC COMMUNITY ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds CORE ↗
  • Who funds Muslim American Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY MUSLIM MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC SHURA COUNCIL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ISLAH LA ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds NAEEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST COAST ISLAMIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GUIDANCE COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hasan Charity Foundat…The Zakat Foundation …Edwards Lifesciences …Sempra FoundationBibi FoundationM Zamin & Reshma Faru…American Muslim Commu…Islamic Relief USAOrange County Islamic…Verizon FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Charities Aid Foundat…
Hasan Charity FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hasan Charity Foundation · The Zakat Foundation of America · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Bibi Foundation · M Zamin & Reshma Farukhi Family Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · Orange County Islamic Foundation · Verizon Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mohammady Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mohammady Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mohammady Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mohammady Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mohammady’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home