Skip to content
Moffat County United Way at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Moffat County United Way

Moffat County United Way is the leader that unites the community toward positive change by strengthening health, education, and financial stability for our residents.

$184k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$616kHuman Services$317kYouth Development$204kFood & Nutrition$64kEmployment$58kCrime & Legal$58kReligion$54kAnimals$18k
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $137,316, the rows itemized in this filing. The $183,773 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,457 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
$9,320
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER$38,318
NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH$16,120
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$14,250
HORIZONS$12,700
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LOVE INC$9,320
SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER$9,238
CONNECTIONS 4 KIDS$7,186
PARTNERS FOR YOUTH$7,000
MEMORIAL REGIONAL HEALTH$6,651
BEAR RIVER YOUNG LIFE$6,533
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HORIZONS: $26k → 10%HORIZONS: $26k → 10%HORIZONS: $26k → 10%HORIZONS: $26k → 10%HORIZONS: $26k → 10%HORIZONS: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 18 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$8k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER
    6× · 2018–2023 · $222k · revenue +69%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $194k · revenue +179%
  • HS
    HORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES
    6× · 2018–2023 · $143k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
2
Routt County Council On Aging Inc

Our mission is to determine the needs of older adults in Routt County and to make every effort to meet those needs with appropriate action.

Human Services
3
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
4
Colorado Thrives

Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.

Community Improvement
5
Youth & Family Connections Co Trestle Inc

Youth and Family Connections provides youth and families resources and alternatives that lead to a successful life.

Human Services
6
Colorado Health Institute
Health
7
Routt County Riders

Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.

Education
8
Connections for Independent Living

To promote the full inclusion and integration of people with all types of disabilities into all levels of society.

—
9
Northwest Colorado Community Health Partnership Inc

ORGANIZATIONS MISSION: We foster equitable access to health and well-being resources so our community can thrive. Oragnizations Vision: To help people live longer, healthier lives.

Health
10
Northwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc

To provide independent living, working and educational opportunities for people with disabilities in Northwest Colorado.

Education
11
Grief Center of Southwest Colorado

Grief support to those who have lost a loved one.

Health
12
Colorado Works

To research and distribute information to citizens advocating for workers and a strong jobs market in colorado

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association; the most unlike its peers is Freedom Hooves Therapeutic Riding of Nw Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER: $222,343 · OtherCOMMUNITY BUDGET CENTERMOFFAT COUNTY UNITED WAY: $83,419 · OtherMOFFAT COUNTY UNITED WAYInterfaith Food Bank: $64,000 · OtherInterfaith Food BankFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CRAIG COLORADO: $54,127 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CRAIG COLORADONORTHWESTERN COLORADO DENTAL COALITION: $54,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN COLORADO DENTAL COALITIONMEMORIAL REGIONAL HEALTH: $44,280 · OtherMEMORIAL REGIONAL HEALTHREACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC: $38,000 · OtherREACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INCFREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF NW COLORADO: $36,000 · OtherFREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF NW COLORADOMOFFAT COUNTY CANCER SOCIETY: $28,351 · Other+3 more: $36,809 · Other+3 moreNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $194,282 · HealthNORTHWEST COLORADO VIS…COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC: $78,000 · HealthCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL…HORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES: $142,950 · Human ServicesHORIZONS SPECIAL…Love Inc Of The Yampa Valley: $47,817 · Human ServicesLove Inc Of The …Senior Citizens Action Group: $14,498 · Human ServicesSenior Citizens …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO: $118,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…YOUNG LIFE: $78,289 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFECONNECTIONS 4 KIDS: $7,186 · Youth DevelopmentCOLORADO LEGAL SERVICES: $40,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY: $7,000 · Education
Other$661,329Health$272,282Human Services$205,265Youth Development$203,725Crime & Legal$40,000Education$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER: $222,343 over 6y, 11% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $194,282 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES: $142,950 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO: $118,250 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMOFFAT COUNTY UNITED WAY: $83,419 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $78,289 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC: $78,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Food Bank: $64,000 over 4y, 51% of budgetLove Inc Of The Yampa Valley: $47,817 over 5y, 16% of budgetCOLORADO LEGAL SERVICES: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC: $38,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetFREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF NW COLORADO: $36,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetSenior Citizens Action Group: $14,498 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCONNECTIONS 4 KIDS: $7,186 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO ↗
  • Who funds MOFFAT COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Love Inc Of The Yampa Valley ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds REACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING OF NW COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds Senior Citizens Action Group ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS 4 KIDS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Yam…Yampa Valley Medical …Rocky Mountain Health…The Colorado TrustColorado Gives Founda…Craig-Scheckman Famil…El Pomar FoundationMile High United Way …Kettering Family Foun…Anschutz Family Found…The Colorado Health F…Fidelity Investments …
United Way of the Yampa ValleyCO24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Yampa Valley · Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Colorado Gives Foundation · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Kettering Family Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moffat County United Way funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moffat County United Way. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moffat County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home