Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Missouri Children's Trust Fund

Child abuse/neglect prevention

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$923k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$15MHealth$11MCrime & Legal$6.2MCommunity Improvement$2.4MPhilanthropy$2.3MRecreation & Sports$1.8MEducation$1.0MArts & Culture$905kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $345k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.7M
$60,464
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIDS WIN MISSOURI$923,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$446,754
CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSPITAL$445,552
NUTURE KC$325,526
THE CHILD ADVOCATE CENTER$295,882
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS$252,749
WHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC$244,157
GENERATE HEALTH STL$237,536
METRO ORG COUNTER SEXUAL ABUSE$221,302
THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP$149,268
LUTHERAN FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES$149,020
CITY OF COLUMBIA$128,850
MISSOURI NETWORK OF CHILD ADVOCATES$126,187
ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY$100,000
SPRINGFIELD- GREEN COUNTY$90,293
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $12.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $275k → 16%YOUTH IN NEED: $267k → 5%SYNERGY SERVICES INC: $722k → 8%DOGWOOD RANCH CORP: $339k → 8%EVANGELICAL CHILDRENS HOME: $802k → 11%KIDS HARBOR INC: $497k → 13%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $154k → 16%GOOD SAMARITEN BOYS RANCH: $118k → 18%KIDS WIN MISSOURI: $928k → 21%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $195k → 16%YOUTH IN NEED: $91k → 5%MISSOURI NETWORK OF CHILD ADVOCATES: $158k → 10%KIDS HARBOR INC: $106k → 13%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $149k → 16%GOOD SAMARITEN BOYS RANCH: $112k → 18%KIDS WIN MISSOURI: $923k → 21%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $155k → 16%MISSOURI KIDS FIRST: $147k → 10%KIDS HARBOR INC: $66k → 13%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $136k → 16%MISSOURI NETWORK OF CHILD ADVOCATES: $126k → 10%KIDS HARBOR INC: $65k → 13%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $85k → 16%MISSOURI KIDS FIRST: $82k → 10%MISSOURI KIDS FIRST: $71k → 10%MISSOURI KIDS FIRST: $54k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN: $702k → 15%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $55k → 16%MISSOURI NETWORK OF CHILD ADVOCATES: $52k → 10%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN: $75k → 18%KIDS WIN MISSOURI: $67k → 21%YOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY: $335k → 11%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN: $57k → 18%KIDS WIN MISSOURI: $61k → 21%KIDS WIN MISSOURI: $51k → 21%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT: $524k → 15%FATHER SUPPORT CENTER: $79k → 21%FATHER SUPPORT CENTER: $58k → 21%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $541k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $447k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $336k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $246k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $128k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $125k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $100k → 11%MBCH CHILDREN & FAMILY: $230k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD CHS: $98k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD CHS: $64k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
MA
PA
MO
MD
KS
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35M · 98 repeat orgs$7.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

98 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
42

Total granted

$35M
$7.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+19%

Still filing today

78%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KW
    KIDS WIN MISSOURI
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +640%
  • WK
    WHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +40% · 44% of their budget
  • NF
    NURSES FOR NEWBORNS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • NM
    NORTHWEST MISSOURI CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $850k · revenue -37% · 67% of their budget
  • SL
    St Lukes Hospital of Kansas Citygraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $850k · revenue +44%
  • FC
    FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2024 · $850k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
2
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
3
Children's Center

Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.

—
4
Missouri Children's Trust Fund

Child abuse/neglect prevention

—
5
Memphis Child Advocacy Center

The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.

Crime & Legal
6
Family Service and Guidance Center of Topeka Inc

Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…

Health
7
Harcum House

Our mission is to reduce trauma and enhance healing by providing advocacy, education and outreach.

Human Services
8
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

—
9
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
10
Family Health Center of Boone County

To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.

—
11
Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund

Children's services fund ('csf') is an innovative way to support child well-being projects. while we are funded by a jackson county sales tax, we are a stand-alone organization led by an independent board. (continued on schedule o)we are…

Human Services
12
Childrens Advocacy Center of Smith County

The children's advocacy center of smith county's mission is to protect and restore the lives of abused children through team investigations, healing services, community outreach and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of Missouri and the most unlike its peers is Golden Valley Door of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealthcare & Community Heal…Family FoundationsVeterans Support ServicesSenior Housing and Support …Reproductive Health and Can…Youth Development ProgramsCatholic Social ServicesEarly Childhood and K-12 Sc…Disability Services & Emplo…Arts and Cultural Organizat…Regional Economic Developme…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr16%12%10–20yr15%41%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr22%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%8%5–10yr16%8%10–20yr15%49%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr22%21%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/140
the rest of the field
13%
3,701/28,511

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
114/116
Grantees still filing
82/116
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIDS WIN MISSOURI — $2,040,717 · Human ServicesKIDS WIN MISSOURINURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $1,938,639 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNSSYNERGY SERVICES INC — $886,587 · Human ServicesSYNERGY SERVICES INCEvangelical Children's Home — $802,071 · Human ServicesEvangelical Children's HomeMISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST CHILD ABUSE — $768,514 · Human ServicesMISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST CHILD AB…KIDS HARBOR INC — $748,911 · Human ServicesKIDS HARBOR INCTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $703,902 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC — $702,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MI…Social Finance Inc — $624,850 · Human ServicesFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC — $545,196 · Human Services+25 more — $3,217,844 · Human Services+25 moreCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI — $941,737 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY …United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc — $932,999 · OtherUnited Way of Greater Kansa…FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $850,000 · OtherFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GR…GREAT CIRCLE — $820,600 · OtherGREAT CIRCLEEL DORADO SPRINGS PAT — $528,848 · OtherLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI — $470,032 · OtherST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY — $418,881 · OtherEASTER SEALS MIDWEST — $366,766 · OtherA RED CIRCLE — $550,000 · OtherCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES — $366,673 · OtherCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $410,400 · Other+60 more — $4,212,424 · Other+60 moreWHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC — $2,030,542 · Crime & LegalWHOLE KIDS OUTREACH I…METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT — $1,671,637 · Crime & LegalMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZA…THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $871,711 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CE…THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST — $666,919 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER…THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC — $589,172 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CE…RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $462,853 · Crime & LegalRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATI…JASPER COUNTY CASA — $458,275 · Crime & LegalJASPER COUNTY CASATHE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC — $418,053 · Crime & Legal+7 more — $1,261,811 · Crime & Legal+7 moreThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $1,466,122 · HealthThe Children's Mer…GENERATE HEALTH STL — $1,270,190 · HealthGENERATE HEALTH ST…NURTURE KC — $978,758 · HealthNURTURE KCNORTHWEST MISSOURI CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $850,000 · HealthNORTHWEST MISSOURI…St Lukes Hospital of Kansas City — $850,000 · HealthSt Lukes Hospital …DEXTER COMMUNITY REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $614,063 · HealthDEXTER COMMUNITY R…Advocates For a Healthy Community Inc — $480,260 · HealthAdvocates For a He…+12 more — $807,832 · Health+12 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC — $1,426,210 · Community ImprovementDUNKLIN COUNTY CARING COUNCIL INC — $140,597 · Community ImprovementRANDOLPH COUNTY CARING COMMUNITIES INC — $91,792 · Community ImprovementFront Porch Alliance - Kansas City Inc — $84,568 · Community ImprovementJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $65,614 · Community Improvement+1 more — $5,600 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $703,500 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $319,200 · PhilanthropyPREVENTION CONSULTANTS OF MISSOURI — $317,578 · PhilanthropySOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN — $1,245,815 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $32,620 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$12,979,231Other$10,869,360Crime & Legal$8,430,973Health$7,317,225Community Improvement$1,814,381Philanthropy$1,340,278Recreation & Sports$1,278,435

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIDS WIN MISSOURI — $2,040,717 over 6y, 25% of budgetWHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC — $2,030,542 over 9y, 44% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $1,938,639 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT — $1,671,637 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $1,466,122 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC — $1,426,210 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetGENERATE HEALTH STL — $1,270,190 over 6y, 22% of budgetSOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN — $1,245,815 over 7y, 29% of budgetNURTURE KC — $978,758 over 3y, 12% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Kansas City Inc — $932,999 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSYNERGY SERVICES INC — $886,587 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $871,711 over 3y, 12% of budgetNORTHWEST MISSOURI CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $850,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $850,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $820,600 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetEvangelical Children's Home — $802,071 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetMISSOURI NETWORK AGAINST CHILD ABUSE — $768,514 over 9y, 10% of budgetKIDS HARBOR INC — $748,911 over 5y, 19% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $703,902 over 8y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $703,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI INC — $702,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST — $666,919 over 2y, 24% of budgetSocial Finance Inc — $624,850 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDEXTER COMMUNITY REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $614,063 over 7y, 86% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC — $589,172 over 8y, 12% of budgetA RED CIRCLE — $550,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC — $545,196 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAdvocates For a Healthy Community Inc — $480,260 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI — $470,032 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $462,853 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA — $458,275 over 1y, 60% of budgetST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY — $418,881 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC — $418,053 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI — $410,400 over 1y, 29% of budgetEASTER SEALS MIDWEST — $366,766 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES — $366,673 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetYOUTH IN NEED — $358,560 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION — $339,250 over 1y, 56% of budgetFATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS — $336,719 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $335,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $319,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENTION CONSULTANTS OF MISSOURI — $317,578 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES — $297,340 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetMBCH CHILDREN AND FAMILY MINISTRIES — $271,656 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI CASA — $269,455 over 2y, 17% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $242,007 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGood Samaritan Boys Ranch — $229,858 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $223,015 over 6y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Commerce Bancshares F…Veterans United Found…Jackson County Commun…The Sunderland Founda…Community Foundation …St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…United Way of Greater…Norman J Stupp Founda…Je and le Mabee Found…Youthbridge Community…Employees Community F…
Commerce Bancshares FoundationMO63.5× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · The Sunderland Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Missouri Children's Trust Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • National Institute for Children's Health Quality Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Social Finance Inc — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines