Skip to content
Mission Pre-Born Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mission Pre-Born Inc

Mission: pre-born, inc.

$3.7M
Granted FY2023
107
Grants FY2023
24
States reached
$194k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$18MHealth$4.1MPhilanthropy$3.0MHuman Services$487kEmployment$28kCivil Rights$26k
02FY2023 · 107 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k75 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.8M
$23,632
Median grant
24
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Heartbeat of Miami$194,148
Prestonwood Caring People Net$191,572
Houston Pregnancy Center$178,116
Womens Care Center South Ben$149,352
Pregnancy Center of the Coast$126,422
Austin Life Care - The Source$99,559
First Coast Womens Services$89,916
Hope Womens Resource Clinic$83,396
Marys Pregnancy Resource Cen$68,712
Alcove Health Womens Center$65,400
Pregnancy Help 4 U$64,150
Watermark Health$63,706
Metroplex Womens Clinic$61,712
CareNet Preg Center of CenTX$61,350
Pregnancy Help Center of WH$60,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $627k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Pregnancy Care Clinic of Chan: $6k → 11%Hope Womens Center: $12k → 5%Northeast Texas Heart of Hope: $25k → 13%Raffa Clinic: $8k → 13%Anchor Point: $10k → 14%Houston Pregnancy Center: $178k → 16%Lifes Choices Womens Clinic: $8k → 10%First Care Womens Clinic - W: $56k → 11%Coastal Choices Womens Clini: $37k → 12%Gate Pregnancy Resource Cente: $7k → 8%Womens Health & Wellness Cli: $6k → 11%Helping Hands Crisis Pregnanc: $17k → 9%Mosaic Virginia: $7k → 4%Shreveport Pregnancy Center: $26k → 22%Houston Pregnancy Center: $71k → 16%Palm Beach Womens Clinic: $22k → 11%Grace House Pregnancy Resourc: $9k → 12%Houston Pregnancy Center: $46k → 16%First Care Womens Clinic - W: $6k → 11%Resources for Women: $9k → 12%Waterleaf Womens Center: $28k → 7%Resources for Women: $6k → 12%Waterleaf Womens Center: $21k → 7%Waterleaf Womens Center: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
NC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 44 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 64 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
9

Total granted

$3.1M
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+1%

Still filing today

91%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsReligionHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    Houston Pregnancy Help Center Inc
    3× · 2020–2023 · $295k · revenue +56%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $206k · revenue +43%
  • HO
    HEARTBEAT OF MIAMI INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • AC
    A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue +11%
  • HU
    HOPE UNLIMITED FAMILY CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • GR
    GOD'S RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
2
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
3
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
4
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
5
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
6
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
—
7
Center for Pregnancy Choices Metro Area

The organization's mission is to honor god's standard of the sanctity of human life by empowering women facing unplanned pregnancies to choose life.

Health
8
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
9
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
10
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

—
11
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
12
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Pregnancy Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Liv Pregnancy and Women's Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/113
Grantees still filing
71/113
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Servant Foundation: $18,340,000 · ReligionServant Foundation+4 more: $116,612 · ReligionNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $3,000,000 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIA…WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $205,680 · HealthWOMEN'S CAR…HEARTBEAT OF MIAMI INC: $200,148 · HealthHEARTBEAT O…CORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $144,402 · HealthCORPUS CHRI…New Beginnings Center of Hope Inc: $134,749 · HealthFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $112,576 · HealthAvenues Pregnancy Clinic: $109,483 · HealthAustin Lifecare: $105,339 · HealthWOMEN'S HELP CENTER INC: $99,871 · HealthHope Center for Crisis Pregnancy dba Hope Womens Resource Clinic: $93,588 · Health+51 more: $1,443,321 · Health+51 morePRESTONWOOD CARING PEOPLE NETWORK: $197,572 · OtherMary's Pregnancy Resource Center: $143,144 · OtherCHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC: $72,372 · OtherA BETTER CHOICE PREGNANCY SERVICES FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY SERVICES: $71,744 · OtherGuadalupe Medical Center: $64,028 · OtherPREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC DBA ADIRA CLINIC: $60,200 · OtherALPHA PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $50,700 · OtherTHE EVERGREEN ASSOCIATION: $48,803 · OtherDALLAS LIFE INC: $43,589 · Other+17 more: $337,679 · OtherHouston Pregnancy Help Center Inc: $295,460 · Human ServicesFirst Care Family Resources Inc: $83,508 · Human ServicesWaterleaf Women's Center Inc: $55,144 · Human ServicesGRACE HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $45,873 · Human ServicesLOVING CHOICE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesSHREVEPORT PREGNANCY CENTER: $25,600 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST TEXAS HEART OF HOPE: $25,100 · Human Services+12 more: $119,813 · Human ServicesANNS NEW LIFE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $25,600 · Civil RightsEMBRACE OF WICHITA INC: $25,100 · Civil RightsKERR COUNTY CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL: $16,634 · Civil RightsTHE CARE CENTER INC: $12,928 · Civil RightsOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $8,530 · Civil RightsPregnancy Assistance Center North: $24,696 · Housing & ShelterUnited For Life to His Glory Inc: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterGreater Fort Worth Pro-Life Ministries: $27,448 · Education
Religion$18,456,612Philanthropy$3,000,000Health$2,649,157Other$1,089,831Human Services$690,498Civil Rights$88,792Housing & Shelter$37,196Education$27,448

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetServant Foundation: $18,340,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Pregnancy Help Center Inc: $295,460 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $205,680 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHEARTBEAT OF MIAMI INC: $200,148 over 2y, 14% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $144,402 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetNew Beginnings Center of Hope Inc: $134,749 over 2y, 38% of budgetFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $112,576 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetAvenues Pregnancy Clinic: $109,483 over 2y, 14% of budgetAustin Lifecare: $105,339 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWOMEN'S HELP CENTER INC: $99,871 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetHope Center for Crisis Pregnancy dba Hope Womens Resource Clinic: $93,588 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetFirst Care Family Resources Inc: $83,508 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC: $72,372 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetA BETTER CHOICE PREGNANCY SERVICES FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY SERVICES: $71,744 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetCARE NET RESOURCE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC: $65,400 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP 4U INC: $64,150 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetWATERMARK HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $63,706 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetARLINGTON PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $61,712 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $61,350 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC DBA ADIRA CLINIC: $60,200 over 1y, 11% of budgetAssist Crisis Pregnancy Center: $56,883 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $56,393 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetWaterleaf Women's Center Inc: $55,144 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCARING NETWORK NFP: $53,385 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetALPHA PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $50,700 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $49,961 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC: $49,632 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetINVOLVED FOR LIFE INC: $49,615 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetTHE EVERGREEN ASSOCIATION: $48,803 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetGRACE HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $45,873 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetFIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTERS INC: $45,292 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetDALLAS LIFE INC: $43,589 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $43,248 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHorizon Pregnancy Center: $41,532 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF THE TREASURE COAST: $41,334 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetLOVING CHOICE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE LUKE CLINIC: $36,106 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetEVE'S HOPE: $35,554 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetGRACE WOMENS CARE CENTER INC: $35,448 over 1y, 49% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF GASTON C: $35,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC: $33,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetRACHEL HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERS INC: $33,020 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSAV-A-Life Of Tuscaloosa Inc: $32,075 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetMID-CITIES PREGNANCY CARE INC: $28,784 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA CHOICE FOR LIFE INC: $27,800 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGreater Fort Worth Pro-Life Ministries: $27,448 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetGRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $26,780 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…Vitamin Angel Allianc…Save the StorksCouncil for Life4 USVitamin BridgeFlorida Pregnancy Car…Choose Life IncAmerican Endowment Fo…Florida K of C Charit…Care NetChristian Community F…
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT69.9× affinity37 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Save the Storks · Council for Life · 4 US · Vitamin Bridge · Florida Pregnancy Care Network Inc · Choose Life Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Florida K of C Charities Inc · Care Net · Christian Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mission Pre-Born Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission Pre-Born Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    16get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mission Pre-Born Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mission Pre-Born Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mission Pre-Born’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home