· Public charity
Choose Life Inc
Promotion of the official florida state choose life license plate and distributing the funds collected from them to non governmental, not for profit agencies within florida to be used to assist pregnant women who are making an adoption plan for their babies.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $352k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $122k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PE | $63,250 |
| GRANTS 5000 | $58,458 |
| HEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE | $48,722 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES BUREAU | $47,130 |
| ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $38,673 |
| MANASOTA SOLVE | $30,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PALM | $29,467 |
| COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS | $25,119 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NWFL | $23,936 |
| CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES | $22,859 |
| FIRST COAST WOMENS SERVICES | $20,764 |
| GRACE WOMMEN'S CARE CENTER | $18,325 |
| GOOD NEWS FOR LIFE | $13,300 |
| LIFE OPTIONS CLINIC | $13,300 |
| A WOMEN'S PLACE MEDICAL CLINIC | $10,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC9× · 2017–2025 · $832k · revenue +96%
- AFADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES9× · 2017–2025 · $284k · revenue +53%
- HOHEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- LCLIFE'S CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +229%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NW FLORIDAone grant, 2018 · $21k
- AAAdoption Authority Incone grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies
An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.
Crisis pregnancy councelling
Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…
The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.
New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…
Choosing Life over Abortion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pregnancy & Family Life Center and the most unlike its peers is United in Love Adoptions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds HEART OF ADOPTIONS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MANASOTA-SOLVE INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Bureau Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds First Coast Womens Services Inc ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF THE TREASURE COAST ↗
- Who funds HOPE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Alpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER NAVARRE INC ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH CRISIS PREGNANCY CTR ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF PANAMA CITY INC ↗
- Who funds Education for Life Inc ↗
- Who funds GRACE WOMENS CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY PREGNANCY SERVICES OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds St Gerard Campus ↗
- Who funds GRACE HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BREHON INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Inn Ministry ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NIGHTLIGHT CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS ↗
- Who funds IMMOKALEE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE'S CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds FOREVER FAMILIES HOME STUDY AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS FOR LIFE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Florida Pregnancy Care Network Inc · Florida K of C Charities Inc · Mission Pre-Born Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Camelot Community Care Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Warren P Powers Charitable Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Choose Life Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Alpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc — 46% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc — 12% of income from government
- Alpha House of Pinellas County Inc — 12% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida — 5% of income from government
- Catholic Charities Bureau Inc — 1% of income from government
- Choices Clinics Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.