Skip to content
Mintz Family Foundation Inc The at a glance

· Private foundation

Mintz Family Foundation Inc The

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$54kReligion$28kCrime & Legal$15kInternational$11kHuman Services$9kCivil Rights$8kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NCJWESSEX$11,400
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION$6,000
ACLU$5,000
ADL$5,000
CRITICAL RESISTANCE$4,800
PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND$4,750
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$4,250
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$4,000
NEWARK COMMUNITY STREET TEAM$4,000
AMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATION$2,500
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$2,500
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM$2,000
JEWISH WOMENS FOUNDATIONJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ$2,000
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND (NFBORG)$2,000
CITY HARVEST INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIRLS HELPING GIRLS PERIOD: $1k → 16%GIRLS HELPING GIRLS PERIOD: $1k → 16%FOCUS HISPANIC CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 29 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
2

Total granted

$131k
$903

Still filing today

66%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthInternationalCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +10%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +3%
  • IF
    INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • ET
    EVERY TOWN
    one grant, 2024 · $800
  • PC
    PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $103
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Physicians for Palestine
Health
2
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
3
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
4
National Institute for Reproductive Health Action Fund Inc

The national institute for reproductive health action fund conducts non-partisan issue advocacy and electoral engagement to advance reproductive health, rights, and justice in states and cities across the country. nirh action fund builds…

—
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
8
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
9
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
10
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
11
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
12
The Conversationalist
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Helping Girls Period; the most unlike its peers is SoQuiet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
7/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NCJWESSEX: $25,100 · OtherNCJWESSEXPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7,250 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODACLU: $5,550 · OtherACLUADL: $5,550 · OtherADLAMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND (NFBORG): $3,500 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $3,046 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,750 · Other+14 more: $11,743 · Other+14 moreCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $11,200 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATIO…American Heart Association Inc: $6,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association …American Diabetes Association: $4,250 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Associati…URBAN INDIGENOUS COLLECTIVE INC: $3,250 · HealthURBAN INDIGENOUS COLLECTIVE…ANNIETOBER 365 FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthANNIETOBER 365 FOUNDATIONsoQuiet: $2,850 · HealthsoQuietTHE AUDRE LORDE PROJECT INC: $2,300 · HealthTHE AUDRE LORDE PROJECT INC+1 more: $800 · HealthCritical Resistance: $6,050 · Crime & LegalCritical R…Newark Community Street Team Inc: $6,000 · Crime & LegalNewark Com…EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN …PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $7,750 · InternationalPALESTINE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,150 · InternationalAMERICAN …The Pad Project: $2,000 · InternationalThe Pad P…CITY HARVEST INC: $3,250 · Food & NutritionINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES: $2,500 · Food & NutritionNEW JERSEY ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $3,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ: $2,000 · PhilanthropyGIRLS HELPING GIRLS PERIOD: $2,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS HISPANIC CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$69,489Health$34,150Crime & Legal$13,050International$11,900Food & Nutrition$5,750Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $11,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $7,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCritical Resistance: $6,050 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNewark Community Street Team Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN INDIGENOUS COLLECTIVE INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANNIETOBER 365 FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNEW JERSEY ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetsoQuiet: $2,850 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AUDRE LORDE PROJECT INC: $2,300 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS HELPING GIRLS PERIOD: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS HISPANIC CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREIMAGINING JUSTICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVINGSTON FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIVINGSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Geraldine R Dodge Fou…Community Foundation …The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Geraldine R Dodge Foundation IncNJ13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mintz Family Foundation Inc The funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mintz Family Foundation Inc The. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Newark Community Street Team Inc: 38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mintz Family Foundation Inc The’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home