· Private foundation
Milton Tenenbaum Char Fdn # 856220
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPRYE | $10,000 |
| FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC | $10,000 |
| CITY HARVEST | $10,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE OF WESTCHESTER INC | $7,500 |
| GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC | $6,000 |
| ST MARY'S FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN | $6,000 |
| BOYS CLUB OF MOUNT KISCO INC | $5,000 |
| HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $5,000 |
| CONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| RSHM LIFE CENTER INC | $4,500 |
| GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC | $3,000 |
| BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC | $2,500 |
| PEGASUS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC | $2,000 |
| ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC | $2,000 |
| UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF JEWIS | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FWFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC4× · 2021–2025 · $52k · revenue +24%
- FSFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC4× · 2021–2025 · $32k · revenue +34%
- SMST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC4× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +199%
Funded once
- BSBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INCone grant, 2025 · $3k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
To provide services to children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. the school runs preschool and school age programs.
Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…
To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.
The summit center, inc. is a private, not-for-profit organization approved by new york state to provide educational, therapeutic, and support services to children and young adults with autism, speech delays and disorders, and other…
Gateway's organizational mission is a dedication to promoting habilitative and mental health services to developmentally disabled and severely and persistently mentally ill population by establishing a safe environment that supports…
Daystar kids promotes the health care, therapeutic, educational, and social goals for children whose development is disrupted by hospitalization and/or treatment for their complex health care conditions.
Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…
At heritage christian services, we believe in possibilities. established in 1984, heritage christian services strives to advance an inclusive and equitable community. our more than 3,900 employees work alongside the people who choose our…
The mission of family service society of yonkers is to be the premier provider of human services through a range of programs focusing on home health care, diverse family supports, education and advocacy. family service society of yonkers…
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rshm Life Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds SPRYE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RSHM Life Center ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
- Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds PEGASUS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Peckham Family Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Milton Tenenbaum Char Fdn # 856220 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.