Skip to content

· Private foundation

Milligan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$37kHuman Services$29kInternational$23kYouth Development$11kFood & Nutrition$9kHealth$8kEducation$1k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$147k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKS$4,204
TULSA BOYS HOME$3,000
TULSA GIRLS HOME$3,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$2,500
EVANGEL UNIVERSITY$2,500
CHURCH ON THE MOVE$2,305
REVIVE OUR HEARTS$1,300
EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES$1,000
ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$1,000
SEND ME INTERNATIONAL$1,000
NSU FOUNDATION$750
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OUR DAUGHTER'S INTL: $3k → 8%OUR DAUGHTER'S INTL: $1k → 8%TULSA BOYS HOME: $8k → 15%TULSA BOYS HOME: $3k → 15%TULSA BOYS HOME: $3k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $2k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $1k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 14 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$112k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+32%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Emergency Infant Services Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +35%
  • TULSA BOYS' HOME INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +25%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • IRON GATE INCgraduated
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +32%
  • TS
    THE SPRING
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k
  • PO
    Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orphan Outreach

To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.

International
2
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
3
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
4
Open Door Adoption Agency Inc

The mission of Open Door Adoption Agency is to preserve and enhance human life through the placement of domestic and international children into loving Christian adoptive families. The counseling and placement services of the ministry…

—
5
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International
6
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
7
Visiting Orphans Incorporated

Organization was established in 2005 as a way to fulfill the biblical mandate given in James 1:27 to Visit orphans and widows in their distress. Today, the mission has expanded to include caring for families and communities, orphan…

—
8
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
9
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
10
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
11
Bless the Children Ministries Inc

To be the love of christ to uganda's orphaned and vulnerable children, equipping them to become authentic godly leaders that transform generations

International
12
Pilgrim Africa

Pilgrim Africa's mission is to challenge despair, love boldly, and help African people create a future of sustainable prosperity and health. We give ourselves in service to others regardless of economic, religious, or social standing,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission; the most unlike its peers is Send Me International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $16,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTULSA GIRLS HOME: $13,500 · OtherTULSA GIRLS HOMEREVIVE OUR HEARTS: $6,300 · OtherREVIVE OUR HEARTSFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKS: $5,204 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKSTHE SPRING: $5,000 · OtherTHE SPRINGALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTL: $4,000 · OtherALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTLCHURCH ON THE MOVE: $3,805 · OtherCHURCH ON THE MOVE+7 more: $7,603 · Other+7 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,546 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEIRON GATE INC: $9,000 · ReligionIRON GATE INCSend Me International Inc: $9,000 · ReligionSend Me International IncProject Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home: $4,500 · ReligionProject Orphans Inc dba Tuls…Emergency Infant Services Inc: $14,000 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services…TULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INCOur Daughters International: $4,000 · Human ServicesOur Daughters Internation…Crisis Pregnancy Outreach Inc: $7,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $2,500 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $1,000 · InternationalEvangel University: $2,500 · Education
Other$62,162Religion$35,046Human Services$31,500Health$7,000International$3,500Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $14,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,546 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSend Me International Inc: $9,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCrisis Pregnancy Outreach Inc: $7,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetProject Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home: $4,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOur Daughters International: $4,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEvangel University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds Send Me International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Pregnancy Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home ↗
  • Who funds Our Daughters International ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Evangel University ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milligan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milligan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milligan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph