Skip to content
Michelin Charity Golf Tournament FKA Michelin Pro-Am Charity Golf Tournament at a glance

· Public charity

Michelin Charity Golf Tournament FKA Michelin Pro-Am Charity Golf Tournament

Facilitate donations to charitable causes through organization of golf tournament.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.4MHuman Services$1.1MEducation$670kHousing & Shelter$541kArts & Culture$435kEnvironment$321kCommunity Improvement$321kYouth Development$184kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $1,453,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,623,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $170,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$170,100
Median grant
6
States reached
$158k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sara's Project$170,100
Tillary Compassionate Care$170,100
SC School for Deaf and Blind$170,100
The Greenville Symphony Association$170,100
SOS Inc$170,100
Best Defense Foundation$170,100
Junior Achievement of Kentuckiana Inc$170,100
The Champions Center for Special Children$170,100
Upstate Warrior Solutions$93,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Best Defense Foundation: $170k → 11%YW8 Inc: $76k → 16%The Champions Center for Special Children: $170k → 15%Friends of Fisher House Comlumbia SC: $75k → 16%Tillary Compassionate Care: $170k → 13%Developmental Center for Exceptional Children: $76k → 15%Fisher House: $46k → 16%Tillary Compassionate Care: $100k → 13%Developmental Center for Exceptional Children: $75k → 15%Friends of Fisher House Comlumbia SC: $33k → 16%Center for Developmental Services: $100k → 10%Community Transportation Network: $76k → 12%Center for Developmental Services: $67k → 10%Louisville Urban League: $67k → 15%Louisville Urban League: $46k → 15%Louisville Urban League Inc: $33k → 15%Upstate Warrior Solutions: $100k → 10%Upstate Warrior Solutions: $93k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
CA
KY
VA
KS
NC
SC
OK
AL

Grants abroad, by region: $170k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$170k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Support organization's activities.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 25 repeat orgs$830k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$4.5M
$320k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $510k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHAMPIONS CENTER
    3× · 2018–2025 · $321k · revenue +33%
  • RM
    ROPER MOUNTAIN SCIENCE CENTER ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2018–2021 · $184k · revenue +71% · 25% of their budget
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA - MOUNTAINS TO MIDLANDS INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $184k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CT
    COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $76k · revenue +66%
  • EH
    ESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $76k · revenue +10%
  • DE
    DOTHAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $76k · revenue -98% · 27% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
2
South Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault

Sccadvasa is the collective voice promoting the prevention of domestic violence and sexual assault in south carolina

—
3
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
4
Upstate Sc Alliance Inc

To market the upstate sc region to attract business investment. to support economic development efforts of the upstate alliance investors. to build cohesive relationships among the region's private and public sectors.

Community Improvement
5
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
6
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

—
7
Advance Community Health Community Development Corporation

The community development corporation will create equitable and accessible whole-person solutions for every resident of north carolina through community collaboration and investment made possible by the community development corporation.

Human Services
8
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
9
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
10
South Carolina Home Care & Hospice Association

To provide leadership, education and advocacy for home care and hospice providers in south carolina.

—
11
Community Action Coalition for South Central Wisconsin Inc

At community action coalition for south central wisconsin, inc. (cac) our mission is to transform our communities by fostering conditions where everyone can achieve social and economic security. cac exists to push back on poverty. our…

—
12
Survivor Empowerment Center Inc

To end domestic violence and sexual assault in southern illinois and assist survivors of these crimes and their non-offending significant others.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tuscaloosa Safe Centerinc; the most unlike its peers is Chamber of Commerce Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
17/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHAMPIONS CENTER: $320,900 · Human ServicesTHE CHAMPIONS CENTERHOSPICE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $270,100 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF STANLY COUNTY INCUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $193,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INCDONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $170,100 · Human ServicesDONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUN…CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $167,300 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICE…Fisher House of Columbia Sc Inc: $153,700 · Human ServicesFisher House of Columbia Sc IncTHE LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $146,500 · Human ServicesTHE LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INCCOMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $76,300 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ADOLESCENT RESOURCES INC: $76,300 · Human ServicesSOS Inc: $270,100 · OtherSOS IncSCSDB FOUNDATION: $270,100 · OtherSCSDB FOUNDATIONROPER MOUNTAIN SCIENCE CENTER ASSOCIATION: $183,900 · OtherROPER MOUNTAIN SCIENCE CENTER ASSOCIATIONNEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATION: $183,900 · OtherNEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $153,700 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ANDERSON INC: $113,400 · OtherMETROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL: $111,300 · OtherDOTHAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $76,300 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KENTUCKIANA INC: $170,100 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KENTUCKIANA INCST JOSEPH MISSIONS INC: $167,300 · OtherST JOSEPH MISSIONS INCCONESTEE FOUNDATION INC: $167,300 · OtherCONESTEE FOUNDATION INCCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC: $153,700 · OtherCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INCTUSCALOOSA SAFE CENTERINC: $113,400 · Other+1 more: $14,790 · OtherSARA'S PROJECT INC: $270,100 · HealthSARA'S PROJECT…NAMI National: $150,800 · HealthNAMI NationalSTANLY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $146,500 · HealthSTANLY HEALTH …CHILDREN'S HOPE INC: $113,400 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOP…GREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $170,100 · Arts & CultureWIREGRASS MUSEUM OF ART INC: $153,700 · Arts & CultureOUR UPSTATE SC: $167,300 · Community ImprovementCHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $153,700 · Community ImprovementFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $167,300 · Housing & ShelterESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $76,300 · Housing & ShelterGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA - MOUNTAINS TO MIDLANDS INC: $183,900 · Youth Development
Human Services$1,574,200Other$2,149,290Health$680,800Arts & Culture$323,800Community Improvement$321,000Housing & Shelter$243,600Youth Development$183,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHAMPIONS CENTER: $320,900 over 3y, 20% of budgetHOSPICE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $270,100 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSARA'S PROJECT INC: $270,100 over 2y, 17% of budgetSOS Inc: $270,100 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSCSDB FOUNDATION: $270,100 over 2y, 25% of budgetUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $193,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetROPER MOUNTAIN SCIENCE CENTER ASSOCIATION: $183,900 over 3y, 25% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA - MOUNTAINS TO MIDLANDS INC: $183,900 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATION: $183,900 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $170,100 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KENTUCKIANA INC: $170,100 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $167,300 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetST JOSEPH MISSIONS INC: $167,300 over 2y, 21% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $167,300 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCONESTEE FOUNDATION INC: $167,300 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetOUR UPSTATE SC: $167,300 over 2y, 12% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $153,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFisher House of Columbia Sc Inc: $153,700 over 3y, 19% of budgetCAMPERDOWN ACADEMY INC: $153,700 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetWIREGRASS MUSEUM OF ART INC: $153,700 over 3y, 13% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $153,700 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetNAMI National: $150,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTANLY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $146,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $146,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTUSCALOOSA SAFE CENTERINC: $113,400 over 2y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ANDERSON INC: $113,400 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE INC: $113,400 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL: $111,300 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $76,300 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $76,300 over 1y, 15% of budgetDOTHAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $76,300 over 1y, 27% of budgetSOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ADOLESCENT RESOURCES INC: $76,300 over 1y, 27% of budgetGREENVILLE COUNTRY CLUB: $14,790 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationDaniel-Mickel Foundat…Enterprise Holdings F…Milliken & Company Ch…The Jolley FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Publix Super Markets …Scsymmes FoundationThe Fluor FoundationUnited Way of Greenvi…Scansource Charitable…Local Boys Do Good
Duke Energy FoundationNC22.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Milliken & Company Charitable Foundation · The Jolley Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Scsymmes Foundation · The Fluor Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Local Boys Do Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michelin Charity Golf Tournament FKA Michelin Pro-Am Charity Golf Tournament funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michelin Charity Golf Tournament FKA Michelin Pro-Am Charity Golf Tournament. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michelin Charity Golf Tournament FKA Michelin Pro-Am Charity Golf Tournament?

    Find your warmest path to Michelin Charity Golf Tournament FKA Michelin Pro-Am Charity Golf Tournament through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michelin Charity Golf Tournament FKA Michelin Pro-Am Charity Golf Tournament’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home