Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mentors

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$631k
Granted FY2025still arriving
66
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MYouth Development$257kArts & Culture$175kAnimals$158kHealth$129kCommunity Improvement$75kEmployment$73kEnvironment$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $174k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $458k
$8,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SURF AND TURF THERAPY$35,000
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AT HOME$25,000
INNER CITY ARTS$20,000
CHILDREN'S CABINET$20,000
GREEN OUR PLANET$20,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$19,721
EUROPEA UNIVERSIDAD$16,940
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$16,813
SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY$16,500
Individual grant recipient$15,225
COLLEGE OF BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY$15,000
JOHN'S HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$15,000
SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($2.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($371k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S CABINET: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
NC
SC
OK
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($371k)

9 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Cameroon$183k · 9 grants
United Kingdom$39k · 3 grants
Kenya$37k · 2 grants
Spain$36k · 3 grants
Ghana$26k · 6 grants
Thailand$24k · 3 grants
Canada$14k · 2 grants
Czechia$7k · 1 grant
Germany$6k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Mentors’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mentorslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 52 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
108

Total granted

$1.7M
$977k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+17%

Still filing today

25%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $398k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $102k · revenue +115%
  • IA
    INNER-CITY ARTS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $92k · revenue +44%
  • DC
    DEBATE-KANSAS CITY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SK
    STRATEGIC KIDS FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $28k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
6
Arcadia University

Arcadia university's pioneering, global, integrated, liberal arts, and professional learning experience cultivates leaders who are intellectually fearless and uniquely prepared for life and work. our highly regarded, values-based learning…

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
9
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
10
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
11
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City University; the most unlike its peers is Opportunity Alliance Nevada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 199 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
19/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $155,000 · OtherUNITED ACTION FOR CHILDRENENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AT HOME: $128,750 · OtherENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AT HOME+168 more: $2,109,847 · Other+168 moreECHO COLLECTIVE: $60,000 · EducationECHO COLLEC…THE SEWING LABS: $32,500 · EducationTHE SEWING …OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE NEVADA: $25,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITY…FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $24,123 · EducationFRANCISCAN …TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF…COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $20,000 · EducationCOLLEGE POS…OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CI…University of Miami: $19,721 · EducationUniversity …OTTAWA UNIVERSITY: $18,060 · EducationOTTAWA UNIV…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationSTERLING COLLEGE: $12,000 · EducationBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $11,461 · Education+8 more: $41,381 · Education+8 moreDEBATE-KANSAS CITY: $87,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTRATEGIC KIDS COLLABORATIVE INC: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentLos Angeles Team Mentoring Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentINNER-CITY ARTS: $92,000 · Arts & CultureARTS WITH OTHERS: $20,800 · Arts & CultureCAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $102,000 · AnimalsGREEN OUR PLANET: $52,000 · EnvironmentThe One Thread Project Inc: $25,500 · InternationalMalembe Rise Inc: $24,300 · International
Other$2,393,597Education$319,246Youth Development$114,000Arts & Culture$112,800Animals$102,000Environment$52,000International$49,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $102,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $92,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDEBATE-KANSAS CITY: $87,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetECHO COLLECTIVE: $60,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetGREEN OUR PLANET: $52,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSurf and Turf Therapy: $50,600 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetTHE SEWING LABS: $32,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetThe One Thread Project Inc: $25,500 over 1y, 24% of budgetOPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE NEVADA: $25,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMalembe Rise Inc: $24,300 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $24,123 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTS WITH OTHERS: $20,800 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCULTIVATING CODERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $19,721 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOTTAWA UNIVERSITY: $18,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATEGIC KIDS COLLABORATIVE INC: $17,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $11,461 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles Team Mentoring Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreekside Elementary School PTA: $7,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetBARRY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,353 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $3,590 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Business Council: $2,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommission For Case Manager Certification: $420 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds DEBATE-KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds ECHO COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds GREEN OUR PLANET ↗
  • Who funds Surf and Turf Therapy ↗
  • Who funds THE SEWING LABS ↗
  • Who funds The One Thread Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds Malembe Rise Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ARTS WITH OTHERS ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CULTIVATING CODERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mentors funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mentors. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Barry University Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 199 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mentors’ filings →

More from the funding graph