Skip to content
McKeesport Hospital Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

McKeesport Hospital Foundation

The foundation is a non-profit, community-based, pennsylvania corporation that builds an endowment to benefit and provide funding support for health-related charitable entities located in the communities served by upmc mckeesport.

$883k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$474k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$4.1MFood & Nutrition$503kRecreation & Sports$201kPublic Safety & Disaster$196kHuman Services$159kEducation$150kAnimals$126kEmployment$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $840,221, the rows itemized in this filing. The $882,599 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,378 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $351k
  • $250k+1 grant · $474k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPMC MCKEESPORT HOSPITAL$474,021
RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICE$25,000
CENTER FOR VICTIMS$25,000
MON RIVER FLEET LIONS CLUB$22,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF ELIZABETH FORWARD$21,000
CAMP SOLES$21,000
MCKEESPORT AGAPE CENTER$20,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$20,000
PROPEL SCHOOLS$20,000
MCKEESPORT AREA MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
BALDWIN EMS$20,000
MCKEESPORT AREA SHARED MINISTRY$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$15,000
MCKEESPORT AMBULANCE AUTHORITY$15,000
GLOBAL LINKS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $338k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $10k → 10%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $10k → 10%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $10k → 10%YMCA Camp Soles co Karla Schell: $23k → 14%RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $25k → 11%YMCA Camp Soles co Karla Schell: $15k → 14%RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $25k → 11%Rainbow Kitchen Community Service co Donna Little Executive Director: $25k → 11%Rainbow Kitchen Community Service co Donna Little Executive Director: $25k → 11%RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $25k → 11%RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $25k → 11%Rainbow Kitchen Community Service co Donna Little Executive Director: $15k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS: $25k → 11%Center for Victims co Laurie MacDonald Executive Director: $25k → 11%Center for Victims co Laurie MacDonald Executive Director: $10k → 11%MISSION AGAPE: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES: $8k → 11%Auberle co Emily Wentworth Grant Writer: $5k → 11%Human Services Center Corporation co David Coplan Executive Director: $7k → 11%McKeesport Collaborative co Ruth Smith: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 26 repeat orgs$517k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$5.1M
$388k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+36%

Still filing today

62%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    Mckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $179k · revenue +109% · 27% of their budget
  • RK
    RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $165k · revenue +6%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $137k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • LD
    LIONS DIABETES BOARD OF ALLEGHENY AND WESTMORELAND COUNTIE
    one grant, 2021 · $96k
  • MR
    Mon River Fleet Lions Club co Laura Bosnak Thompson Secretary
    one grant, 2019 · $66k
  • DV
    Dravosburg Vol Fire Dept 1 Social Clubgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue +205% · 32% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburg Volunteer Fire Department

Provide fire protection for over 100 members

—
2
North Penn Volunteer Fire Company

To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.

—
3
Community Fire South Whitehall Twp

The organization provides fire protection for properties & vehicles or other rescue services to 18,000 residents & community of 17 sq miles of south whitehall township, lehigh county, pa.

—
4
Hose Co 6 Kittanning

Provide Fire Fighting service, river rescue, emergency medical and ambulance service to Kittanning and local areas.

—
5
Upper Lancaster Vol Rescue SquadInc

Volunteer Rescue Squad Services

—
6
Lower Burrell Vol Fire #3

To provide fire and ambulance (and other emergency support) for emergency calls for the City of Lower Burrell, PA which has approximately 14,000 residents.

—
7
Bear Creek Township Volunteer Hose Company

Community fire protection

—
8
Duncannon Fire Company No 1 Inc

Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services

—
9
New WIlmington Volunteer Firemens Assoc Co John Geidner

To provide Fire Protection and Emergency Services to the Community

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Goodwill Fire Company #1

Provide volunteer fire protection, public safety services, and fire safety education to approx 23,000 people in myerstown, pa and the surrounding areas.

—
11
Burnsville Volunteer Fire Department

Mission for burnsville vfd burnsville wv the burnsville vfd provides fire protection fire safety and emergency rescue services to the citizens in its designated area. bvfd serves in a safe efficient manner serving all stakeholders.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Alum Bank Community Fire Company

Provided Fire & Rescue Services to Alum Bank, PA and surrounding area.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Victims; the most unlike its peers is Kane Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
18/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPMC: $3,681,138 · OtherUPMC+24 more: $724,256 · Other+24 moreRAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $165,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR VICTIMS: $60,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $38,000 · Human ServicesBEVERLY'S PGH: $30,000 · Human ServicesMission Agape Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN SERVICES CENTER CORPORATION: $12,500 · Human Services+2 more: $12,500 · Human ServicesMckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc: $178,625 · Food & NutritionGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $60,000 · Food & NutritionMCKEESPORT AGAPE CENTER: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionUPMC: $87,128 · HealthTHE 9TH STREET CLINIC: $55,000 · HealthHERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $25,000 · HealthFIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC: $25,000 · HealthTHE ALIVER FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $15,000 · HealthCANCER BRIDGES: $10,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC: $137,117 · Recreation & SportsBaldwin Emergency Medical Service: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $63,940 · EducationPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationADVANCING ACADEMICS: $20,000 · EducationDravosburg Vol Fire Dept 1 Social Club: $35,834 · Public Safety & DisasterWHITE OAK BOROUGH VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY NO 1: $21,500 · Public Safety & DisasterFIRE DEPARTMENT OF NORTH VERSAILLES: $12,147 · Public Safety & DisasterRainbow Volunteer Fire Company of White Oak Borough: $12,000 · Public Safety & DisasterELIZABETH TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT NO 1: $11,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCITIZENS HOSE COMPANY #1: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$4,405,394Human Services$338,000Food & Nutrition$268,625Health$217,128Recreation & Sports$157,117Education$103,940Public Safety & Disaster$97,481

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMckeesport Meals on Wheels Inc: $178,625 over 7y, 27% of budgetRAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $165,000 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC: $137,117 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetUPMC: $87,128 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $63,940 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR VICTIMS: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 9TH STREET CLINIC: $55,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $38,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDravosburg Vol Fire Dept 1 Social Club: $35,834 over 1y, 32% of budgetVIGILANT HOSE COMPANY NO 1 OF PORT VUE: $35,610 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetGLOBAL LINKS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetElizabeth Fireman's AssociationInc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetWHITE OAK BOROUGH VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY NO 1: $21,500 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetJOHN J KANE REGIONAL CENTERS FOUNDATION: $20,150 over 2y, 66% of budgetMission Agape Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetADVANCING ACADEMICS: $20,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetBaldwin Emergency Medical Service: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ALIVER FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES CENTER CORPORATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIRE DEPARTMENT OF NORTH VERSAILLES: $12,147 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRainbow Volunteer Fire Company of White Oak Borough: $12,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetKANE FOUNDATION: $11,900 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetELIZABETH TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT NO 1: $11,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE INTERSECTION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPA CLEANWAYS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCANCER BRIDGES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUBERLE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS HOSE COMPANY #1: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Jefferson Regional Fo…E R Crawford Est Trus…The United Way of Sou…The Grable FoundationUpmc GroupCharles F Peters Foun…Richard King Mellon F…Hillman Family Founda…Massey Charitable Tru…Snee-Reinhardt Charit…The Heinz Endowments
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA42× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Jefferson Regional Foundation · E R Crawford Est Trust Fund a Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Grable Foundation · Upmc Group · Charles F Peters Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Massey Charitable Trust · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McKeesport Hospital Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McKeesport Hospital Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McKeesport Hospital Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McKeesport Hospital Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McKeesport Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home