Skip to content
McCullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Endowment Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

McCullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Endowment Fund

The foundation provides support to mccullough-hyde memorial hospital and the surrounding community.

$594k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$276k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$884kHuman Services$197kFood & Nutrition$109kEducation$74kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$30kHousing & Shelter$18kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $481,933, the rows itemized in this filing. The $593,920 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $111,987 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $250k+1 grant · $276k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED$276,233
OXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC$25,000
TALAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$22,000
JUNCTION INCORPORATED$19,000
YOUNG WOMEN CHRISTIANS ASSOCIATION (YWCA HAMILTON)$17,000
TALAWANDA OXFORD PANTRY AND SOCIAL SERVICES$15,500
TRIANGLE THERAPY ASSOCIATION$11,400
TALAWANDA ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC$10,200
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BUTLER COUNTY INC$10,000
COMMUNITY CARE IN UNION COUNTY INC$9,000
BUTLER COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER$9,000
PREBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$7,800
THREAD UP OXFORD$7,800
HOME IS THE FOUNDATION$7,500
HIDEAWAY TRAILS FOR HOPE RANCH$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 11%HOPE'S CLOSET: $5k → 16%COUNCIL ON AGING OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $10k → 16%OXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $37k → 12%OXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $25k → 12%OXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $10k → 12%HOPE-FULL PASTURES THERAPEUTIC FARMS: $5k → 12%SERVE CITY INC: $10k → 12%SERVE CITY INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 8 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$1.2M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+1%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED
    4× · 2018–2025 · $738k · revenue +3%
  • OS
    OXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $72k · revenue +11%
  • T
    TOPSS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $68k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • OC
    OXFORD COLLEGE CORNER CLINIC
    one grant, 2024 · $22k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    COLLEGE CORNER LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • CO
    Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Butler County Humane Society
Animals
2
Ohio Heartland Community Action

Operate programs to assist low and moderate income individuals and families.

Human Services
3
Butler County Council On Aging Inc

We prepare meals for senior citizens and provide a place for recreational activities and fellowship. meals are served in our building or are delivered to home-bound individuals.

Human Services
4
Southern Ohio Area Task Force on

Provide services to the victims of domestic voilence

Human Services
5
Ohio Housing Council

To advocate and educate on behalf of our members to increase the quality and supply of affordable housing in the state of ohio, and to provide our members with current legislative awareness, a forum for voicing legislative and programmatic…

Community Improvement
6
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
7
Telespond Senior Services Inc

To promote the general well-being of the elderly in northeastern pennsylvania through a variety of programs.

Human Services
8
Community Health Professionals Inc

To provide comprehensive, progressive, community-based, health care services to the people of northwest and west central ohio and surrounding areas. community health professionals believes in high quality, compassionate care that promotes…

Health
9
Oakhouse

Vocational and educational services

—
10
Ohio Teaching Family Association

Foster care and counseling of significantly abused ad troubled youth

Human Services
11
Council on Aging Wyandot

To provide services under Title II of The Older American Citizens Act of 1965

—
12
Oberlin Community Services Council

Oberlin community services council is a responsive community organization that provides direct assistance, referrals, outreach and educational support to lorain county residents who struggle to meet basic needs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Women's Christian Association of Hamilton Ohio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Home Is the Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED: $737,586 · HealthMCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED+1 more: $21,500 · HealthTALAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $160,986 · OtherTALAWANDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HAMILTON OHIO INC: $62,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIAT…UNION COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY UNION COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $40,000 · OtherUNION COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE LIBR…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BUTLER COUNTY INC: $30,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BUTL…JUNCTION INCORPORATED: $19,000 · OtherCOLLEGE CORNER LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,000 · Other+9 more: $71,900 · Other+9 moreOXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $71,500 · Human ServicesOXFORD SE…SERVE CITY: $20,000 · Human ServicesSERVE CIT…Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio: $10,000 · Human ServicesCouncil o…PREBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $7,800 · Human ServicesPREBLE CO…HOPE'S CLOSET INC: $5,300 · Human ServicesHope-Full Pastures Therapeutic Farm: $5,200 · Human ServicesTOPSS: $67,500 · Food & NutritionPARACHUTE SPECIAL ADVOCATE FOR CHILDREN OF BUTLER COUNTY: $10,000 · Civil RightsCOMMUNITY CARE IN UNION COUNTY INC COMMUNITY CARE IN UNION COUNTY INC: $9,000 · Community ImprovementHOME IS THE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterTHREE VALLEY CONSERVATION TRUST: $6,000 · Environment
Health$759,086Other$398,886Human Services$119,800Food & Nutrition$67,500Civil Rights$10,000Community Improvement$9,000Housing & Shelter$7,500Environment$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED: $737,586 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetOXFORD SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $71,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTOPSS: $67,500 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HAMILTON OHIO INC: $62,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BUTLER COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOXFORD COLLEGE CORNER CLINIC: $21,500 over 1y, 23% of budgetSERVE CITY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTALAWANDA ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC: $10,200 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCouncil on Aging of Southwestern Ohio: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARACHUTE SPECIAL ADVOCATE FOR CHILDREN OF BUTLER COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Butler County United …Greater Oxford Commun…Hamilton Community Fo…The Northern Cincinna…Middletown Community …Hatton FoundationThe Dayton FoundationThe Greater Cincinnat…Duke Energy FoundationGe Aerospace Foundati…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Butler County United WayOH26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Butler County United Way · Greater Oxford Community Foundation · Hamilton Community Foundation · The Northern Cincinnai Foundation · Middletown Community Foundation · Hatton Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Endowment Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Endowment Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McCullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Endowment Fund?

    Find your warmest path to McCullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Endowment Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Endowment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home