Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hatton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
69
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$330k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$2.8MPhilanthropy$2.1MHuman Services$1.7MYouth Development$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$1.1MReligion$428kAnimals$314kOther$0
02FY2025 · 69 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $534k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $660k
  • $250k+2 grants · $580k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NUXHALL FOUNDATION INC$330,000
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION$250,000
GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION$150,000
IMPACT AUTISM FOUNDATION INC$150,000
TURNING POINT USA$100,000
INSPIRING PURPOSE DAY PROGRAM INC$100,000
FOUND VILLAGE$60,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$50,000
CINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION$50,000
INSPIRATION STUDIOS INC$45,000
TALBERT HOUSE$40,000
PILLAR OF FIRE$30,000
BLOC MINISTRIES INC$25,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC$25,000
PROKIDS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ONSLOW WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 12%4 Paws for Ability Inc: $20k → 9%LIFELINE PILOTS: $20k → 14%The PointARC of Northern Kentucky: $35k → 11%THE NIGHT STALKER FOUNDATION: $3k → 18%Green Beret Foundation: $105k → 16%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $15k → 9%THE NIGHT STALKER FOUNDATION: $3k → 18%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $10k → 9%CASA OF LEXINGTON: $10k → 15%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%4 Paws for Ability Inc: $6k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $4k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%Circle Tail Inc: $5k → 6%TALBERT HOUSE: $80k → 16%Strategies to End Homelessness: $50k → 16%MOMSHOPE: $1k → 6%Talbert House: $40k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $40k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $40k → 16%Talbert House: $40k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $40k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $40k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $40k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOME OF CINCINNATI: $50k → 16%Serve City: $5k → 12%CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI OHIO I: $13k → 16%PREGANCY CENTER PLUS: $10k → 16%PREGANCY CENTER PLUS: $1k → 16%STEPPING STONES INC: $15k → 16%STEPPING STONES: $15k → 16%St Aloysius Orphanage: $35k → 16%The Shield: $10k → 16%KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $60k → 16%KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $30k → 16%KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $10k → 16%KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $10k → 16%HOPE'S CLOSET: $5k → 16%AGAPE FOR YOUTH: $50k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $33k → 16%AGAPE FOR YOUTH: $20k → 16%AGAPE FOR YOUTH: $20k → 16%AGAPE FOR YOUTH: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
UT
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.1M · 103 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

103 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
104

Total granted

$9.1M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+37%

Still filing today

53%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $254k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $511k · revenue +30%
  • CB
    CINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $390k · revenue +960% · 57% of their budget
  • TH
    TALBERT HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $360k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • SV
    Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +57%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CP
    CINCINNATI POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE
    one grant, 2024 · $84k · 99% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
2
Abilities First Foundation Inc

Abilities First is committed to providing comprehensive services and quality care to each child and adult with special needs to put their abilities first.

Human Services
3
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
4
Columbus Center for Human Services Inc

Inspiring life journeys

Human Services
5
Advocates for Kids

Advocates for Kids is committed to providing service and/or supporting organizations that serve children by providing experiences that empower them to realize their full potential. Advocates for Kids envisions children achieving a clearer…

Youth Development
6
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
7
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
8
Central Ohio Youth for Christ Inc

Coyfc reaches young people everywhere, working with the local church and other like minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
9
Cincinnati's Optimum Residential Environments Inc

Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities

Health
10
Ohio Center for Hope

To promote mental health research in medical developments

Health
11
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
12
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Blue Line Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bear Hug Cattle Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Local History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …School District FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsCommunity Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsYouth Development CentersMilitary Veterans Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%6%<5yr12%10%5–10yr21%23%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr16%27%35–55yr20%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%6%<5yr12%11%5–10yr21%25%10–20yr14%12%20–35yr16%17%35–55yr20%29%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/140
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,166

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

128 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 128 of the 223 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
122/128
Grantees still filing
87/128
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UC HEALTH — $400,000 · OtherUC HEALTHYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HAMILTON OHIO INC — $300,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HAMILTON OH…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER — $282,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO — $220,000 · OtherCalipari Foundation — $200,000 · OtherProKids — $230,000 · Other+127 more — $3,905,992 · Other+127 moreTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $1,350,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CINCINNATI …THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $511,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCI…CINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION — $390,150 · PhilanthropyCINCINNATI BLUE LINE FO…CALIPARI FOUNDATION INC — $195,000 · PhilanthropyCALIPARI FOUNDATION INC+4 more — $82,500 · PhilanthropyTALBERT HOUSE — $360,000 · Human ServicesTALBERT HOU…GREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $322,000 · Human ServicesGREEN BERET…KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE — $110,000 · Human ServicesKEN ANDERSO…AGAPE FOR YOUTH INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE FOR Y…The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio — $62,500 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $54,800 · Human ServicesStrategies to End Homelessness Inc — $50,000 · Human Services+14 more — $217,000 · Human Services+14 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $342,000 · HealthIMPACT AUTISM FOUNDATION INC — $306,000 · HealthMAY WE HELP INC — $85,000 · Health+11 more — $78,500 · HealthThe Marriage School Inc — $342,800 · EducationOHIO VALLEY VOICES — $158,000 · EducationTRIED & TRUE PARENTING INC — $102,050 · EducationGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $90,000 · EducationLINDEN GROVE SCHOOL — $40,000 · Education+8 more — $68,550 · EducationTHE NUXHALL FOUNDATION INC — $392,400 · Recreation & SportsTeam First Foundation — $375,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $12,500 · Recreation & SportsFound Village — $243,000 · Youth DevelopmentAnthony Munoz Foundation — $154,000 · Youth DevelopmentKENTUCKY 4H FOUNDATION INC — $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentCINCINNATI POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $84,151 · Youth DevelopmentENVISION CHILDREN — $22,508 · Youth Development+2 more — $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$5,537,992Philanthropy$2,528,650Human Services$1,276,300Health$811,500Education$801,400Recreation & Sports$779,900Youth Development$633,659

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $1,350,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $511,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NUXHALL FOUNDATION INC — $392,400 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION — $390,150 over 5y, 57% of budgetTeam First Foundation — $375,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE — $360,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Marriage School Inc — $342,800 over 5y, 76% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $342,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION — $322,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetIMPACT AUTISM FOUNDATION INC — $306,000 over 3y, 48% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HAMILTON OHIO INC — $300,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetFound Village — $243,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetProKids — $230,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO — $220,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetCALIPARI FOUNDATION INC — $195,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetOHIO VALLEY VOICES — $158,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetAnthony Munoz Foundation — $154,000 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetKENTUCKY 4H FOUNDATION INC — $115,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetKEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE — $110,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetEaster Seals Tristate — $105,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $102,500 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetTRIED & TRUE PARENTING INC — $102,050 over 6y, 20% of budgetAGAPE FOR YOUTH INC — $100,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $90,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC — $85,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetCINCINNATI POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $84,151 over 1y, 99% of budgetBLOC MINISTRIES INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGenesis at Work Foundation — $77,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetThe Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio — $62,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTHY BEGINNINGS INC — $60,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetINSPIRATION STUDIOS — $55,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC — $54,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStrategies to End Homelessness Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI — $44,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $43,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLINDEN GROVE SCHOOL — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSt Aloysius Orphanage — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget1N5 — $35,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTHE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY — $35,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY — $33,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetST JOSEPH HOME INC — $32,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE — $30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVALLEY VIEW FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetACCOUNTING FOR KIDS — $30,000 over 6y, 43% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NUXHALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI BLUE LINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Team First Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TALBERT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds The Marriage School Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT AUTISM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HAMILTON OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Found Village ↗
  • Who funds ProKids ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAMILTON OHIO ↗
  • Who funds CALIPARI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO VALLEY VOICES ↗
  • Who funds Anthony Munoz Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRING PURPOSE DAY PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY 4H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Easter Seals Tristate ↗
  • Who funds THE FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRIED & TRUE PARENTING INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MAY WE HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds BLOC MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Genesis at Work Foundation ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnat…John a Schroth Family…Elsa M Heisel Sule Ch…Johnson Charitable Gi…Sutphin Family Founda…Andrew Jergens Founda…Hamilton Community Fo…Pfau Charitable Found…The Thomas J Emery Me…Jack J Smith Jr Chari…The Northern Cincinna…The Wohlgemuth Hersch…
The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH83.7× affinity60 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Hamilton Community Foundation · Pfau Charitable Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · The Northern Cincinnai Foundation · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hatton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Farm Aid Inc — 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hatton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hatton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 223 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines