Skip to content

· Private foundation

McConnell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$430k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.1MScience & Tech$814kEducation$264kCrime & Legal$181kRecreation & Sports$92kAnimals$36kFood & Nutrition$30kCivil Rights$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $410k
$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC$110,200
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$100,000
WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION$100,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$100,000
NEW JERSEY AUDUBON SOCIETY$4,000
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PTP$4,000
THE BRANSON SCHOOL$3,000
MARIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
MARK DAY SCHOOL$2,500
NORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC$2,000
AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY$1,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WILD AT HEART INC: $5k → 11%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $200k → 8%MARK DAY SCHOOL: $6k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $105k → 10%STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $110k → 7%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $5k → 17%CONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NJ: $5k → 11%NORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC: $28k → 7%WILD AT HEART INC: $5k → 11%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $165k → 8%MARK DAY SCHOOL: $6k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 10%STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 7%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $5k → 17%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT: $5k → 14%NORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC: $28k → 7%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $125k → 8%MARK DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 10%STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $64k → 7%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT: $5k → 14%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $100k → 8%MARK DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 10%STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $36k → 7%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT: $5k → 14%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $99k → 8%MARK DAY SCHOOL: $5k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 10%STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 7%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT: $5k → 14%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $93k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $66k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150k → 7%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $66k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 10%GROUP FOR THE EAST END: $5k → 7%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $65k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $45k → 10%GROUP FOR THE EAST END: $5k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 11%GROUP FOR THE EAST END: $5k → 7%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $120k → 14%GROUP FOR THE EAST END: $5k → 7%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $114k → 14%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $100k → 14%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $100k → 14%SYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM: $30k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 16 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$2.1M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+402%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsRecreation & SportsEducationScience & TechFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $914k · revenue +69%
  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $434k · revenue +45%
  • SB
    STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $330k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • SM
    SYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +402%
  • CW
    CONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
4
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
7
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
8
Maine Audubon Society

Maine Audubon works to conserve Maine's wildlife and habitat by engaging people of all ages in education, conservation, and action. We are helping the people of Maine become the nation's most informed and effective stewards of wildlife and…

Environment
9
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
10
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
11
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified
12
Center for Natural Lands Management

The mission of the center for natural lands management is (a) to conserve native species, their habitat and functioning ecosystems in perpetuity, (b) to own and/or manage lands in an ecologically beneficial manner consistent with local,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Jersey Audubon Society; the most unlike its peers is North Country Camps Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $816,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYLEAVE NO TRACE CENTER FOR: $180,500 · OtherLEAVE NO TRACE CENTER FOR+8 more: $87,250 · Other+8 moreWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $913,757 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTIO…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $434,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYGROUP FOR THE EAST END INC: $24,000 · Environment+2 more: $14,000 · EnvironmentSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $330,200 · EducationSTONY BROOK F…THE BRANSON SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationNORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC: $72,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionWILD AT HEART INC: $16,000 · AnimalsAmerican Bird Conservancy: $6,000 · AnimalsCONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,083,750Science & Tech$913,757Environment$472,000Education$342,200Recreation & Sports$82,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Animals$27,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $913,757 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $816,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $434,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $330,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC: $72,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetMARK DAY SCHOOL: $34,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGROUP FOR THE EAST END INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWILD AT HEART INC: $16,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHE BRANSON SCHOOL: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY CAMPS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARK DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds GROUP FOR THE EAST END INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD AT HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRANSON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds New Jersey Audubon Society ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA12.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McConnell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McConnell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 63%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey Inc: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McConnell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph