Skip to content

· Private foundation

McCollom Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2026still arriving
31
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$83kHealth$53kArts & Culture$47kEnvironment$45kEducation$41kHuman Services$39kAnimals$34kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2026 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k30 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION$12,000
WOODSTOCK SKI RUNNERS$8,000
VERMONT PUBLIC RADIO$7,500
HIGH HORSES THERAPEUTIC RIDING$5,000
VERMONT LAW SCHOOL INC$5,000
VERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS$5,000
VERMONT FOOD BANK$5,000
THE UPPER VALLEY HAVEN$5,000
NORTHFIELD MT HERMON SCHOOL FUND$5,000
VERMONT LAND TRUST$5,000
SUSTAINABLE WOODSTOCK INC$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND$3,000
PENTANGLE COUNCIL OF THE ARTS$3,000
ZACK'S PLACE ENRICHMENT CENTER$3,000
APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $3k → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $2k → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $2k → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $2k → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $2k → 10%WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $4k → 9%WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 9%WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 9%WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 9%WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$519k · 40 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
2

Total granted

$519k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25’26
Recreation & SportsEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS
    5× · 2022–2026 · $29k · revenue +3%
  • UV
    UPPER VALLEY HAVEN
    5× · 2022–2026 · $25k · revenue +52%
  • VL
    Vermont Law School
    4× · 2023–2026 · $20k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • WA
    WOODSTOCK AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mt Ascutney Outdoors Inc

Mt. Ascutney Outdoors, Inc's mission is to promote vitality within the community by providing affordable and unique recreational, cultural and educational activities to local residents and visitors from the Upper Valley region of Vermont…

Recreation & Sports
2
The Vermont River Conservancy Inc

Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.

Human Services
3
Woodstock Land Conservancy Inc

Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…

Environment
4
Vermont Woodlands Association

Vermont woodlands association's (vwa) mission is to educate and advocate for the practices of productive stewardship, use, and enjoyment of vermont's woodlands. we achieve this mission by delivering educational programs and technical…

Environment
5
Vermont Wilderness School

Provide nature-based education and mentoring to youth and adults in southern vermont and western massachusetts.

Environment
6
Hard'ack Inc

To provide recreation to franklin county, vermont residents through skiing, snowboard, sliding, wilderness trails and sports fields.

—
7
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
8
Connecticut Valley Sno-Riders Inc

Connecticut valley sno-riders, inc. is a volunteer organization founded in 1973 which maintains more than 80 miles of groomed snowmobile trails in vermont.

—
9
Upper Saco Valley Land Trust

The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…

Food & Nutrition
10
Mount Washington Valley Trails Association

Mwv trails is a nh non-profit dedicated to the creation of a sustainable off-road non-motorized trail network in the mount washington valley of new hampshire, focusing on public use trails designed for mountain bike, trail running and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Watersheds United Vermont Inc

Wuvs mission is to empower community-based watershed groups in all parts of the state to protect and restore vermonts waters.

Environment
12
Alliance for Vermont Communities Inc

The mission of alliance for vermont communities, inc. is to protect working farms, forests and communities of central vermont and to promote responsible development that will sustain the rural heritage and values for present and future…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Land Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Woodstock Region Journalism Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Vermont Public Radio: $27,500 · OtherVermont Public RadioUPPER VALLEY HAVEN: $25,000 · OtherUPPER VALLEY HAVENHIGH HORSES CENTER FOR EQUINE- ASSISTED SERVICES: $20,500 · OtherHIGH HORSES CENTER FOR EQUINE- ASSISTED SERVICESOTTAUQUECHEE HEALTH CENTER: $19,000 · OtherOTTAUQUECHEE HEALTH CENTERNEW ENGLAND MASTERS SKI RACING FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND MASTERS SKI RACING FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTHFIELD MT HERMON SCHOOL FUND: $15,000 · OtherNORTHFIELD MT HERMON SCHOOL FUNDLUCY MCKENZIE HUMANE SOC: $15,000 · OtherLUCY MCKENZIE HUMANE SOCPENTANGLE COUNCIL OF THE: $13,000 · OtherNORTHFIELD MT HERMON SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherAPPALACHIAN MNTN CLUB: $10,000 · OtherCOVER HOME REPAIR INC: $14,000 · OtherVERMONT SKI MUSEUM INC: $12,500 · Other+12 more: $55,500 · Other+12 moreVERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS: $28,500 · Recreation & SportsVERMONT ADAPTIVE S…GREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC: $22,000 · Recreation & SportsGREEN MOUNTAIN HOR…Woodstock Ski Runners: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsWoodstock Ski Runn…Woodstock Recreation Center Inc: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsWoodstock Recreati…THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE KELLY S BRUSH …+1 more: $500 · Recreation & SportsVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $27,500 · EnvironmentVERMONT LAND…Sustainable Woodstock Inc: $18,000 · EnvironmentSustainable …Appalachian Mountain Club: $9,000 · EnvironmentAppalachian …UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentVermont Law School: $20,000 · EducationUPPER VALLEY TRAILS ALLIANCE: $12,500 · EducationNORMAN WILLIAMS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $7,500 · EducationWOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $15,500 · Human ServicesWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesVERMONT FOODBANK: $18,000 · Food & NutritionLUCY MACKENZIE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,500 · Animals
Other$280,500Recreation & Sports$87,000Environment$57,500Education$40,000Human Services$24,500Food & Nutrition$18,000Animals$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS: $28,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH HORSES CENTER FOR EQUINE- ASSISTED SERVICES: $20,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetVermont Law School: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWoodstock Ski Runners: $20,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSustainable Woodstock Inc: $18,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $15,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLUCY MACKENZIE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCOVER HOME REPAIR INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVERMONT SKI MUSEUM INC: $12,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetUPPER VALLEY TRAILS ALLIANCE: $12,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWoodstock Recreation Center Inc: $11,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetZack's Place Enrichment Center Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPENTANGLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS: $8,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNORMAN WILLIAMS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWoodstock Region Journalism Foundation Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSTOCK AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Vermont Public Radio ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH HORSES CENTER FOR EQUINE- ASSISTED SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Vermont Law School ↗
  • Who funds Woodstock Ski Runners ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Woodstock Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds LUCY MACKENZIE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COVER HOME REPAIR INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT SKI MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY TRAILS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Woodstock Recreation Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds Zack's Place Enrichment Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PENTANGLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NORMAN WILLIAMS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
  • Who funds Woodstock Region Journalism Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT32.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Htc Cottee Wurster Family Foundation 96010000 · Frank and Brinna Sands Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Rising Phoenix Foundation Inc · The Rauch Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Birdseye Foundation · Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCollom Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCollom Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Vermont Law School: 14% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Vermont Adaptive Ski and Sports: 11% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Trails Alliance: 3% of income from government
  • Cover Home Repair Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Norman Williams Public Library Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Zack's Place Enrichment Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to McCollom Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to McCollom Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McCollom Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph