Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

McCarthy Holdings Charitable Corporation

The corporation will raise funds, primarily through annual tournaments from which the entire net proceeds will be donated to various unaffiliated organizations.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Health$1.5MHuman Services$327kHousing & Shelter$231kInternational$34kEducation$31kPhilanthropy$22kPublic Benefit$10kOther$422k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $405,244 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $419,858 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,614 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
$14,008
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION$75,000
BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION$75,000
NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL INC$75,000
HARRIS HEALTH STRATEGIC FUND$50,000
ARIZONA HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC$25,788
RYAN HOUSE$25,778
FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$14,008
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS$10,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS$10,000
THE SNOW FOUNDATION$10,000
HOME SWEET HOME$10,000
HAPPYBOTTOMS$7,335
HOPEKIDS$7,335
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $327k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $10k → 11%CARE TO LEARN: $18k → 15%HOME SWEET HOME: $10k → 11%CARE TO LEARN: $15k → 15%HAPPYBOTTOMS: $7k → 15%RYAN HOUSE: $26k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $10k → 11%CARE TO LEARN: $10k → 15%FRESH START WOMENDS FOUNDATION: $26k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $10k → 11%CARE TO LEARN: $10k → 15%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI & KANSAS: $39k → 11%MAKE-A-WISH: $12k → 11%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $18k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $18k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $12k → 11%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 11%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDRENS HOME INC: $12k → 11%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NV
CA
CO
MO
AZ
KS
TN
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 20 repeat orgs$459k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$2.0M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationPublic BenefitInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $410k · revenue +20%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $258k · revenue +26%
  • BH
    Baylor Health Care System Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $140k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • PH
    Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue +9%
  • EF
    ERLANGER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue -86%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
8
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation

To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.

Health
10
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
11
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
12
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and Kansas and the most unlike its peers is We'll Get This. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportMilitary Veterans SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/43
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION — $410,000 · HealthNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc — $258,455 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncTexas Children's Hospital Foundation — $195,500 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital FoundationBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $140,000 · HealthBaylor Health Care System FoundationTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL — $82,500 · HealthTHE METHODIST HOSPITALNORTHSIDE HOSPITAL INC — $75,000 · HealthPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc — $70,000 · HealthHARRIS HEALTH STRATEGIC FUND — $50,000 · Health+9 more — $170,958 · Health+9 moreMI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC — $203,500 · OtherMI ESCUELITA PRESC…THE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 · OtherTHE NORTHSIDE HOSP…URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $40,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF ME…ERLANGER FOUNDATION — $24,001 · OtherERLANGER FOUNDATIO…+4 more — $44,500 · Other+4 moreFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $60,458 · Human ServicesFRESH START WO…Care to Learn — $52,500 · Human ServicesCare to LearnMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS — $50,500 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FO…SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $43,416 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE ACRES…HOME SWEET HOME — $40,000 · Human ServicesHOME SWEET HOM…CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $29,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOM…RYAN HOUSE — $25,778 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSEPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE — $17,500 · Human ServicesPATHWAYS TO IN…+1 more — $7,335 · Human ServicesUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC — $135,714 · Housing & ShelterUMOM NEW D…Lydia's House Inc — $52,500 · Housing & ShelterLydia's Ho…HOMEWARD BOUND — $42,500 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWARD B…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $34,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $17,870 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $13,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $12,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SNOW FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $10,000 · Public Benefit
Health$1,452,413Other$422,001Human Services$326,987Housing & Shelter$230,714International$34,000Education$30,870Philanthropy$22,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION — $410,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $258,455 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC — $203,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital Foundation — $195,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $140,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC — $135,714 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL — $82,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc — $70,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $60,458 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCare to Learn — $52,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLydia's House Inc — $52,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS — $50,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHARRIS HEALTH STRATEGIC FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $43,416 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND — $42,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $40,335 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $34,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $29,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION INC — $25,788 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRYAN HOUSE — $25,778 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetERLANGER FOUNDATION — $24,001 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $17,870 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEKIDS INC — $16,835 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children — $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWe'll Get This — $12,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC — $11,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLONGS PEAK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME INNOVATIONS — $9,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHAPPYBOTTOMS — $7,335 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

World Wide Technology…Commerce Bancshares F…The Blackbaud Giving …St Louis Community Fo…Edward Jones Foundati…Employees Community F…Harlene & Marvin Wool…Edward Jones Foundati…Veterans United Found…St Louis Community Fo…Enterprise Holdings F…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…
World Wide Technology FoundationMO21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: World Wide Technology Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · St Louis Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Harlene & Marvin Wool Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McCarthy Holdings Charitable Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McCarthy Holdings Charitable Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to McCarthy Holdings Charitable Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines