Skip to content

· Private foundation

McAbee Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$137kHealth$107kYouth Development$100kHuman Services$100kReligion$52kFood & Nutrition$31kRecreation & Sports$30kAnimals$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$989k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEDOM FARM$50,000
HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA$10,000
BLACK WARRIOR COUNCIL BSA$10,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TUSCALOOSA$10,000
UNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA$10,000
PHOENIX HOUSE$6,250
WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK$5,000
ALABAMA MARINES FOUNDATION$2,500
DCH FOUNDATION$1,250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST ALABAMA$1,000
FRIENDSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
BRITTO FOUNDATION$1,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA: $10k → 17%THE ARC OF TUSCALOOSA: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 23 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
10

Total granted

$496k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+11%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BLACK WARRIOR COUNCIL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $100k · revenue +47%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +63%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • TR
    TUSCALOOSA ROTARY HONOR FLIGHT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The West Alabama Chamber Foundation Inc

To solicit, collect and administer funds and property to be used soley for charitable, educational, religious or scientific purposes.

—
2
Alabama Restaurant & Hospitality Association Foundation
—
3
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
4
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
5
Feeding Alabama

To end hunger by assisting food bank networks in obtaining more food and funds, fostering public awareness of the food banks' mission, and creating partnerships to alleviate hunger in alabama.

Food & Nutrition
6
Alabama Archives & History Foundation

To raise funds to support the work of the Alabama Department of Archives and History, Alabama's State Archival and Museum agency.

Arts & Culture
7
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
8
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
9
Food Bank of North Alabama Inc

collect warehouse & distribute food to needy organizations

Food & Nutrition
10
Arc of Tusc County Endowment Fund

To receive, invest and manage funds for the benefit of the arc of tuscaloosa county.

Philanthropy
11
Walker County Community Agency Inc

The mission of the organization is to reduce the effects of proverty in walker county, al

—
12
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of West Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Britto Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARA FOUNDATION: $47,500 · OtherPARA FOUNDATIONFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TUSCALOOSA: $45,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF TUSCALOOSAEASTER SEALS OF WEST ALABAMA: $22,500 · OtherEASTER SEALS OF WEST ALABAMATHE SALVATION ARMY: $20,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $20,500 · OtherWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INCYMCA OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY: $19,000 · OtherYMCA OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTYPHOENIX HOUSE INC: $18,750 · OtherPHOENIX HOUSE INCCOMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC: $10,500 · OtherTUSCALOOSA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $63,500 · Other+17 moreBLACK WARRIOR COUNCIL: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLACK WARRIOR COU…UNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF W…THE ALABAMA MARINES FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyTHE ALABAMA MAR…+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyDCH Foundation Inc: $56,500 · EducationDCH Foundati…Stillman College: $8,400 · EducationStillman Col…Gold Star Mentors INC: $3,000 · EducationFREEDOM FARM INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTUSCALOOSA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesThe Arc of Tuscaloosa: $2,500 · Human ServicesTUSCALOOSA SPORTS AND TOURISM: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$277,750Youth Development$100,000Philanthropy$89,500Education$67,900Housing & Shelter$50,000Human Services$25,500Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACK WARRIOR COUNCIL: $100,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetDCH Foundation Inc: $56,500 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetFREEDOM FARM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTUSCALOOSA SPORTS AND TOURISM: $25,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $20,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX HOUSE INC: $18,750 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC: $10,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetStillman College: $8,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALABAMA MARINES FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetHANK POORE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTUSCALOOSA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGold Star Mentors INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetThe Arc of Tuscaloosa: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST ALABAMA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSS ALABAMA BATTLESHIP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBRITTO FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK WARRIOR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds DCH Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds TUSCALOOSA SPORTS AND TOURISM ↗
  • Who funds WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC ↗
  • Who funds Stillman College ↗
  • Who funds THE ALABAMA MARINES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HANK POORE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUSCALOOSA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Gold Star Mentors INC ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of Tuscaloosa ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds USS ALABAMA BATTLESHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRITTO FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Reese Phifer Jr Memorial Attn Susan CorkAL26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Reese Phifer Jr Memorial Attn Susan Cork · The James I Harrison Family Foundation · Nick's Kids Foundation Inc · Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3 · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Lonnie & Kitty Strickland Charitable Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McAbee Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McAbee Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McAbee Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McAbee Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McAbee Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph