· Public charity
Nick's Kids Foundation Inc
The nick's kids foundation is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to raising awareness and resources for deserving organizations throughout the state of alabama and southeast.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $1,172,158 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,618,486 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $446,328 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $300k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $391k
- $250k+1 grant · $412k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SC FOUNDATION | $412,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA | $130,790 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $110,000 |
| WALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| CHILDREN'S OF ALABAMA | $50,000 |
| HIGH SOCKS FOR HOPE INC | $41,000 |
| FREEDOM RAIN INC | $25,000 |
| FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING | $25,000 |
| MERCY CHEFS INC | $25,000 |
| THE RISE SCHOOL OF TUSCALOOSA | $20,000 |
| CITY OF NORTHPORT | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA | $20,000 |
| ST FRANCIS SABAN CATHOLIC STUDENT CENTER | $12,000 |
| BIG OAK RANCH | $12,000 |
| JEREMIAH CASTILLE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $599k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSABAN CENTER FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $813k · revenue ×23 · 26% of their budget
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA8× · 2017–2024 · $445k · revenue +303%
- TCThe Children's Hospital of Alabama8× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- TCTUSCALOOSA COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -31%
- RRRIVER REGION UNITED WAYone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -14%
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.
The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.
Our mission is to speak for the well-being of Alabama's children through research, public awareness, and advocacy.
Encourage and enhance advocacy and family support services on behalf of individuals suffering from mental illness.
To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers
To educate, empower, and improve services for mental health consumers in the state of alabama.
collect warehouse & distribute food to needy organizations
Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.
Goodwill industries provides training and employment for handicapped persons.
Bringing volunteers and communities together to improve the homes and lives of low-income homeowners.
Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center, Inc. is a non-profit organization that is dedicated to ending child abuse through education, advocacy, counseling, family support, and the pursuit of justice.
Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alabama and the most unlike its peers is The Joe Namath Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SABAN CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA ↗
- Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCALOOSA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds High Socks for Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCALOOSA COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds DCH Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TEAM FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNNY MAC SOLDIERS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH CASTILLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLENWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds FAIRMONT STATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEMPORARY EMERGENCY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER REGION UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST AL ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF TUSCALOOSA INC ↗
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THOMAS PLOTT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC ↗
- Who funds Champions Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MAGIC MOMENTS ↗
- Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM RAIN INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS' N AUTISM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Reese Phifer Jr Memorial Attn Susan Cork · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Protective Life Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Se Belcher Jr Private Foundation #3 · The James I Harrison Family Foundation · Walker Area Community Foundation Inc · Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nick's Kids Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nick's Kids Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Nick's Kids Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.