Skip to content
Mathile Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Mathile Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
143
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$15MPhilanthropy$14MReligion$13MEducation$8.2MHuman Services$4.9MHealth$4.1MInternational$3.2MFood & Nutrition$1.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 143 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k42 grants · $144k
  • $10k–50k67 grants · $1.5M
  • $50k–250k25 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+9 grants · $13M
$20,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$292M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GLEN AT ST JOSEPH$5,001,841
AILERON CORP$3,142,280
DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,572,300
CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL$1,021,000
CHAMINADE JULIENNE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$555,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI INC$500,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY$397,400
TEAMLIFT INC$388,183
THE DAYTON FOUNDATION$255,000
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$171,000
OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY$160,000
GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE$120,000
MARIANIST PROVINCE OF THE US$115,000
VICTORY PROJECT$108,000
UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHOOSING HOPE ADOPTIONS: $20k → 15%CHOOSING HOPE ADOPTIONS INC: $20k → 15%A KID AGAIN INC: $51k → 15%A KID AGAIN INC: $30k → 15%A KID AGAIN INC: $25k → 15%A KID AGAIN INC: $21k → 15%A KID AGAIN INC: $16k → 15%BELLBROOK-SUGARCREEK COMMUNITY SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 9%ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $55k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $35k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $25k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $20k → 14%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $50k → 16%ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $100k → 14%ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $75k → 14%ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER: $65k → 14%ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER: $65k → 14%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $39k → 14%ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $30k → 14%A KID AGAIN INC: $31k → 16%I AM BOUNDLESS: $25k → 14%HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $100k → 14%HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $25k → 14%HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $20k → 14%CLOTHES THAT WORK: $40k → 14%CLOTHES THAT WORK: $40k → 14%CLOTHES THAT WORK: $20k → 14%HOMEFULL: $250k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $32k → 14%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $177k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $120k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $110k → 14%ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $100k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $90k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $85k → 14%DAYBREAK INC: $80k → 14%PARITY INC: $75k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $53k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $50k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $40k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $40k → 14%DAYBREAK INC: $40k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $40k → 14%DAYBREAK INC: $35k → 14%DAYBREAK INC: $30k → 14%DAYBREAK INC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60M · 147 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

147 repeat relationships: 103 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

147
68

Total granted

$60M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+3%

Still filing today

76%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The Glen at St Joseph
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21M · revenue +70% · 98% of their budget
  • AC
    Aileron Corp
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15M · revenue +24% · 42% of their budget
  • DC
    DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • H
    HOMEFULL
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -18%
  • CS
    CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $177k · revenue -3%
  • MP
    MARIANIST PROVINCE OF THE UNITED STATES SOCIETY OF MARY
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
2
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
3
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

—
4
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
6
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
9
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
10
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
11
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
12
Dayton Christian Center Inc

To promote community by nuturing children and empowering familites in a christian environment by providing childcare services and supportive services for families.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifewise Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Glen at St Joseph. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

189 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 189 of the 258 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
187/189
Grantees still filing
118/189
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Glen at St Joseph: $21,406,841 · PhilanthropyThe Glen at St JosephTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $1,052,965 · Philanthropy+5 more: $154,500 · PhilanthropyAileron Corp: $14,916,731 · EducationAileron CorpTeamLift Inc: $1,798,861 · EducationTeamLift IncUniversity of Dayton: $689,316 · Education+18 more: $2,596,393 · Education+18 moreCHAMINADE JULIENNE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $2,760,348 · OtherCHAMINADE JULIENNE CATHO…CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY: $1,669,113 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES…CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL: $1,021,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOLOUR LADY OF THE ROSARY: $932,600 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE ROSARYWEST CARE OHIO INC EAST END COMMUNITY SERVICES: $672,000 · OtherMATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN NUTRITION: $764,940 · OtherMATHILE INSTITUTE FOR TH…+112 more: $6,195,766 · Other+112 moreDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,049,300 · HealthBRIGID'S PATH INC: $220,000 · HealthEmerge Recovery and Trades Initiative: $160,567 · HealthMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $115,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $109,500 · Health+10 more: $399,775 · HealthGOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $363,000 · Human ServicesELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $335,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $325,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesHOMEFULL: $250,000 · Human ServicesDAYBREAK INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesHANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $177,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $176,500 · Human ServicesA KID AGAIN INC: $174,000 · Human ServicesCLOTHES THAT WORK: $115,000 · Human Services+23 more: $597,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI INC: $2,500,000 · Religion+2 more: $40,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $775,000 · InternationalMISSION PARTNERS GUATEMALA: $85,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKI PARTNERS: $40,000 · International
Philanthropy$22,614,306Education$20,001,301Other$14,015,767Health$3,054,142Human Services$2,973,000Religion$2,540,000International$900,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Glen at St Joseph: $21,406,841 over 5y, 98% of budgetAileron Corp: $14,916,731 over 5y, 42% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI INC: $2,500,000 over 5y, 73% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,049,300 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetTeamLift Inc: $1,798,861 over 5y, 72% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY: $1,669,113 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $1,052,965 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $775,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetMATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN NUTRITION: $764,940 over 2y, 77% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $689,316 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION: $503,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetLEARN TO EARN DAYTON: $397,000 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $386,513 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON: $380,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $363,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $335,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $325,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMarian University: $302,641 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSINCLAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $299,118 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetK12 GALLERY FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $263,454 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC: $250,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHOMEFULL: $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBRIGID'S PATH INC: $220,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetDAYBREAK INC: $210,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $177,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $176,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetA KID AGAIN INC: $174,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetEmerge Recovery and Trades Initiative: $160,567 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetTHE VICTORY PROJECT LLC: $158,800 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetTHE FOODBANK INC: $130,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $125,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGLEN HELEN ASSOCIATION: $122,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCLOTHES THAT WORK: $115,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES DAYTON: $115,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOODWILL EASTER SEALS MIAMI VALLEY: $115,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY MEALS INC: $112,300 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetOhio Northern University: $111,297 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA Dayton: $110,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPRESCHOOL PROMISE INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $110,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $109,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBLACK BROTHERS-BLACK SISTERS INVOLVEMENT: $95,500 over 4y, 40% of budgetThe Learning Tree Farm Inc: $95,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DAYTON INC: $95,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE GREATER MIAMI VALLEY INC: $95,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetFive Rivers MetroParks Foundation: $95,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame: $92,824 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Glen at St Joseph ↗
  • Who funds Aileron Corp ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TeamLift Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN ↗
  • Who funds MATHILE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN NUTRITION ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds LEARN TO EARN DAYTON ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Marian University ↗
  • Who funds SINCLAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds K12 GALLERY FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF DAYTON OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFULL ↗
  • Who funds BRIGID'S PATH INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYBREAK INC ↗
  • Who funds HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds A KID AGAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Emerge Recovery and Trades Initiative ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTORY PROJECT LLC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOODBANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Dayton Foundation Plu…Iddings Benevolent Tr…Virginia W Kettering …The United Way of the…The Dayton Power and …The CareSource Founda…Cpps Heritage Mission…Levin Family Foundati…WPCU Sunshine Communi…The Berry Family Foun…
The Dayton FoundationOH165.4× affinity101 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · The CareSource Foundation · Cpps Heritage Mission Fund · Levin Family Foundation · WPCU Sunshine Community Fund · The Berry Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mathile Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mathile Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 1% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mathile Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mathile Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 258 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mathile Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home