· Public charity
Maternity and Early Childhood Fdn Inc
The mission of the maternity and early childhood foundation is to provide leadership, education, and resources to community-based agencies in new york state that support new and expectant parents from pregnancy through early childhood.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $144,679 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $183,841 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,162 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION AND CARE OF CHILDREN | $42,000 |
| BIRTHNET INC | $33,000 |
| INDEPENDENT HEALTH FOUNDATION | $27,373 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC | $17,540 |
| DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC | $14,627 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LONG ISLAND | $10,139 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $394k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RSROCHESTER SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN INC5× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +61%
- EOECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL OF SUFFOLK INC4× · 2017–2022 · $81k · revenue +170%
- MIMommas Inc4× · 2017–2022 · $80k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- BSBEDFORD STUYVESANT FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INCone grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue -1%
- NCNORTH COUNTRY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +70%
- MSMOM STARTS HERE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
The agency is dedicated to creating and implementing an interdisciplinary system of identification, referral and single-source access to child development services. the agency's mission is to enable each child to reach his or her…
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
The mission of york county community action corporation is to alleviate the effects of poverty, attack its underlying causes, and to promote the dignity and self-sufficiency of the people of york county, maine.
As a private non-profit health and human services organization, maternal and family health services (mfhs) works to meet the health and nutrition needs of northeastern pennsylvania's women, children, and families with essential…
To mobilize and efficiently manage resources through partnerships and collaborations to help the low-income and at-risk populations in the hudson valley region to achieve greater self-sufficiency.
Family services of westchester offers a broad range of social and mental health services to strengthen and support families, children and individuals at every stages of the life cycle from infancy to adulthood.
Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
To promote an equitable and healthy future for families through services, advocacy, education, and collaboration.through collaboration with hospitals, educators, public health agencies, community-based organizations, consumers, and health…
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Economic Opportunity Council of Suffolk Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Miracle On Craig Street of Schenectady Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROCHESTER SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL OF SUFFOLK INC ↗
- Who funds Mommas Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF Jamestown NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds OSWEGO COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BUFFALO ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE NY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIRTHNET INC ↗
- Who funds BEDFORD STUYVESANT FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM OF LONG ISLAND ↗
- Who funds MOM STARTS HERE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIRACLE ON CRAIG STREET OF SCHENECTADY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maternity and Early Childhood Fdn Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maternity and Early Childhood Fdn Inc?
Find your warmest path to Maternity and Early Childhood Fdn Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.