Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mary & James Harrison Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$521k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of MARY & JAMES HARRISON FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $204k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $317k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSINGS CHURCH$100,000
POKES WITH A PURPOSE$100,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$67,000
OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JEWS FOR JESUS$20,000
NEXT GENERATION IMPACT OKLAHOMA$20,000
ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$19,000
LINDSAY HIGH SCHOOL$18,000
ONE MISSION SOCIETY$15,000
OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,000
LIAMS LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION$12,000
JERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CIRCLE OF CARE: $50k → 16%CIRCLE OF CARE: $25k → 16%CIRCLE OF CARE: $12k → 16%CIRCLE OF CARE: $10k → 16%PROJECT 66: $12k → 16%PROJECT 66: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
RI
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
AR
NC
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 35 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
27

Total granted

$3.0M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

37%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    Pokes With A Purpose Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $385k · revenue +177%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $243k · revenue +88%
  • Zoe Empowers
    8× · 2017–2024 · $142k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $550k
  • LF
    LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL OF BSA
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • NO
    NINETY-NINE ONE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $85k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Good Okc

The Good OKC was created to equip and empower the people of OKC to experience the Kingdom of God in the everyday lives. Far too often we seperate our spiritual lives from our actual life. We believe following Jesus is a 24/7 endeavor and…

Religion
2
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
3
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
4
Gospel Care Collective

Provide resources for global orphan care

Human Services
5
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
6
Oasis Pregnancy Care Centers Corp

Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…

Human Services
7
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
8
Western Oklahoma Christian School Inc

The mission of western oklahoma christian school is to provide a bible based elementary education for the children of christian families in order that each student have the opportunity to grow spiritually strong and scholastically sound

Education
9
Hope Pregnancy Care Center Inc

Hope pregnancy care center is a biblically based, christ-centered corporation organized exclusively for charitable, religious, and educational purposes with the meaning of 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code and are consistent with…

Human Services
10
In the Gap Inc

Equip and inspire young adults to be positive leaders who model integrity, passionately love jesus christ, and effectively influence children to do the same.

Religion
11
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
12
Great Commission University Inc

Gcu serves the global church by educating mission leaders to fulfill the great commission of jesus christ. gcu accomplishes this mission through a comprehensive program of biblical and general education, christ-centered service and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Christian University and the most unlike its peers is Pokes With a Purpose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $550,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $243,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INCIndividual grant recipient — $158,200 · OtherJEWS FOR JESUS — $143,000 · OtherOSU-OKC LEGACY ENDOWED FUND — $141,500 · OtherONE MISSION SOCIETY USA INC — $111,500 · OtherVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC — $104,580 · Other+46 more — $1,641,220 · Other+46 morePokes With A Purpose Inc — $385,000 · Recreation & SportsPokes With…Oklahoma Christian University — $286,500 · EducationZoe Empowers — $142,000 · InternationalJERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE — $88,695 · InternationalCIRCLE OF CARE INC — $96,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT 66 INC — $21,500 · Human ServicesGRACE HOME INC — $65,000 · Housing & ShelterGOOD WORKS INC — $51,500 · Housing & ShelterGUNNISON TOUGH — $41,500 · HealthLIAM'S LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION — $32,000 · HealthLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER ROBERTS — $25,000 · Health
Other$3,093,000Recreation & Sports$385,000Education$286,500International$230,695Human Services$118,000Housing & Shelter$116,500Health$98,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPokes With A Purpose Inc — $385,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetOklahoma Christian University — $286,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $243,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetZoe Empowers — $142,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE INC — $96,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetJERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE — $88,695 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $87,580 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $71,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE HOME INC — $65,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetGOOD WORKS INC — $51,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGUNNISON TOUGH — $41,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGOOD NEWS INC — $36,500 over 6y, 57% of budgetLIAM'S LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION — $32,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER ROBERTS — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPROJECT 66 INC — $21,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pokes With A Purpose Inc
  • Who funds Oklahoma Christian University
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds Zoe Empowers
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF CARE INC
  • Who funds JERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds GRACE HOME INC
  • Who funds GOOD WORKS INC
  • Who funds GUNNISON TOUGH
  • Who funds GOOD NEWS INC
  • Who funds LIAM'S LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Tulsa Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mary & James Harrison Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Oklahoma Christian University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary & James Harrison Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mary & James Harrison Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph