Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$731k
Granted FY2023
21
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$125k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

53% of Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $731k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
2
’18
0
’19
11
’20
4
’21
8
’22
10
’23
11
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.0MEducation$665kFood & Nutrition$290kRecreation & Sports$165kHuman Services$130kInternational$100kHousing & Shelter$71kPhilanthropy$50kOther$0
02FY2023 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $525k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Loyola Academy$125,000
Mayo Clinic$125,000
Lurie Children's Hospital$100,000
Evans Scholars Foundation$100,000
Clearbrook$75,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$25,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$25,000
Mercy Home$20,000
St Jude's Children Hospital$20,000
Journey's - The Road Home$20,000
Miracle Messages$20,000
Covenant House$15,000
Save The Children$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Green City Market$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $209k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Miracle Messages: $20k → 10%Mother's Trust Foundation: $3k → 8%Mother's Trust Foundation: $500 → 8%Clearbrook: $75k → 14%Clearbrook: $50k → 14%Clearbrook: $10k → 14%Clearbrook: $10k → 14%Journeys The Road Home: $20k → 14%Journey's - The Road Home: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
PA
CT
CA
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 19 repeat orgs$383k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$2.1M
$281k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-9%

Still filing today

58%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CLEARBROOK
    4× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +60%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $105k · revenue +17%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • BH
    Baptist Health South Florida Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue -20%
  • NM
    Northwestern Memorial Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CH
    Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
7
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
10
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
11
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
12
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
12/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lurie Children's Hospital: $555,000 · OtherLurie Children's HospitalLOYOLA ACADEMY: $400,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYEvans Scholars Foundation: $150,000 · OtherEvans Scholars FoundationNorthwestern Lake Forest Hopsital: $150,000 · OtherNorthwestern Lake Forest HopsitalSt Jude's Children Hospital: $95,500 · OtherSt Jude's Children Hospital+19 more: $284,500 · Other+19 moreMAYO CLINIC: $1,000,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICBaptist Health South Florida Inc: $125,000 · HealthBaptist Health South Florida Inc+3 more: $50,000 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $105,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER C…NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $85,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN …Feeding America: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding A…CHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM: $45,000 · Food & NutritionCHICAGO'S…+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCLEARBROOK: $145,000 · Human ServicesPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $40,000 · Human ServicesMIRACLE MESSAGES: $20,000 · Human Services+2 more: $8,500 · Human ServicesCristo Rey St Martin College Prep: $105,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College Fund: $10,000 · EducationSave The Children Federation Inc: $45,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,635,000Health$1,175,000Food & Nutrition$290,000Human Services$213,500Education$115,000International$65,000Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $145,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $105,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM: $45,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE MESSAGES: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBISSELL Pet Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMothers Trust Foundation: $3,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLake Forest Police Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health South Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Cristo Rey St Martin College Prep ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE MESSAGES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds Role Model Movement Inc (NFP) ↗
  • Who funds BISSELL Pet Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Mothers Trust Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN13.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Helen V Brach Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary and Ralph Gesualdo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph