Skip to content
Mary and John Elliot Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mary and John Elliot Charitable Foundation

The Mary and John Elliot Foundation's mission is to support the immediate and ongoing resource needs of the Elliot Health System.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$22MHuman Services$741kFood & Nutrition$245kYouth Development$105kCrime & Legal$70kPhilanthropy$65kHousing & Shelter$30k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $181k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester$1,941,934
VNA Home Health and Hospice Services$346,496
Amoskeag Health$70,000
Waypoint$37,000
Easter Seals of New Hampshire$35,000
St Joseph Community Services$35,000
Boys and Girls Club of Greater Manchester$25,000
The Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester$25,000
Elliot Professional Services Network Inc$23,798
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $361k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $40k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $35k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $35k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $35k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $35k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $35k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $34k → 7%Easter Seals of New Hampshire: $34k → 7%Granite State Independent Living: $8k → 7%The Caregivers (Catholic Charities): $25k → 7%Catholic Charities New Hampshire: $25k → 7%Catholic Charities New Hampshire: $10k → 7%Catholic Charities New Hampshire: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 16 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$24M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+31%

Still filing today

94%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19M · revenue +85%
  • AH
    Amoskeag Health
    8× · 2017–2025 · $363k · revenue +50%
  • W
    WAYPOINT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $345k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CAREGIVERS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • GS
    GRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVINGgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visiting Nurse Association of Manchester and Southern New Hampshire Inc

We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.

Health
2
Elliot Health System

Elliot Health System strives to inspire wellness, heal our patients, and serve with compassion in every interaction.

Health
3
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
4
Central New Hampshire Vna & Hospice

Promoting dignity, independence and well-being through the delivery of quality home health, hospice and community-based care services.

—
5
Home Health and Hospice Care

Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.

Health
6
Elliot Physican Network

The Elliot Physician Network is a group of specialized physicians which are dedicated to the promotion of highest quality, compassionate and accessible health care. We realize the importance of each patient and each physician in the…

Health
7
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
8
Granite Vna Inc

The Mission of Granite VNA, Inc. is we enhance dignity and independence for people delivering quality health care and promoting wellness in homes and communities through all stages of life.

Health
9
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
10
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center

Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…

Health
11
Mary and John Elliot Charitable Foundation

The Mary and John Elliot Foundation's mission is to support the immediate and ongoing resource needs of the Elliot Health System.

Health
12
St Joseph Hospital

We are a Catholic health ministry, providing healing and care for the whole person, in service to all in our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vna Home Health and Hospice Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester: $19,414,394 · HealthThe Elliot Hospital of the City of ManchesterVNA Home Health and Hospice Services Inc: $2,144,846 · HealthVNA Home Health and Hospice Services Inc+2 more: $622,686 · HealthST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $210,000 · OtherNew Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight: $148,000 · OtherGRANITE UNITED WAY: $115,000 · OtherThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc: $100,000 · OtherThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $70,000 · OtherNEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC: $70,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherWAYPOINT: $345,300 · Human ServicesEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $282,710 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $70,000 · Human Services+1 more: $8,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentFamilies in Transition: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE WAY HOME INC: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$22,181,926Other$723,000Human Services$706,010Youth Development$105,000Housing & Shelter$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Elliot Hospital of the City of Manchester: $19,414,394 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetVNA Home Health and Hospice Services Inc: $2,144,846 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetAmoskeag Health: $362,667 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWAYPOINT: $345,300 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $282,710 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetElliot Professional Services Network Inc: $260,019 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $210,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetNew Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight: $148,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY: $115,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER: $105,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFamilies in Transition: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WAY HOME INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Harvard Pilgrim Healt…Eastern Bank Foundati…Norwin S and Elizabet…Granite United WayArthur Jr Dobles & Ol…Endowment For Health …Dartmouth-Hitchcock C…Madelaine G Vonweber …Mary Hitchcock Memori…Cogswell Benevolent T…Eastern Cambridge Fou…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati · Granite United Way · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Endowment For Health Inc · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eastern Cambridge Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary and John Elliot Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary and John Elliot Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary and John Elliot’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home