Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary and Charles Sethness Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$581k
Granted FY2025still arriving
90
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$999kEducation$417kCivil Rights$337kHealth$329kAnimals$179kArts & Culture$152kHuman Services$134kFood & Nutrition$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k67 grants · $204k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $378k
$4,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$45,000
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY$30,000
NORTHWOODS ALLIANCE$25,000
WILDERNESS WATCH$25,000
LAND O'LAKES ARTS$22,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$20,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$19,000
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION$16,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$15,000
FEED OUR RURAL KIDS$15,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION$15,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$15,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$12,500
NATURE CONSERVANCY$12,500
CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMENS FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $1k → 12%CENTER ON HALSTEAD: $1k → 14%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 9%URBAN INITIATIVES INC: $3k → 14%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 9%URBAN INITIATIVES INC: $2k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $1k → 14%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PR: $1k → 17%YOUTH CARE: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $3k → 9%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PR: $1k → 17%YOUTH CARE: $1k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $1k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
OH
PA
RI
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 99 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

99 repeat relationships: 66 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

99
37

Total granted

$2.5M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+23%

Still filing today

71%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHealthCivil RightsAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +7%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $127k · revenue +26%
  • WW
    WILDERNESS WATCH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $119k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue +48%
  • LO
    LAND O LAKES COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
9
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
10
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Denver Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Feed Our Rural Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
115/116
Grantees still filing
77/116
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TROUT UNLIMITED: $145,330 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITEDLAND O'LAKES ARTS: $124,330 · OtherLAND O'LAKES ARTSNORTHWOODS ALLIANCE INCORPORATED: $105,000 · OtherNORTHWOODS ALLIANCE INCORPORATEDYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION: $104,580 · OtherYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $79,500 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $55,000 · OtherK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $50,000 · Other+84 more: $676,070 · Other+84 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $126,750 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES …WILDERNESS WATCH INC: $119,000 · EnvironmentWILDERNESS WATCH I…AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY: $55,500 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVER CON…FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $24,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $22,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $19,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $19,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $18,000 · Environment+11 more: $55,000 · Environment+11 moreDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $130,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSI…WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $90,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENN…ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $62,500 · EducationST NORBERT COLL…THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationTHE CHICAGO SCH…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF M…+9 more: $45,000 · Education+9 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $192,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTE…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $23,500 · Civil RightsTREVOR PR…HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $11,000 · Civil Rights+7 more: $19,000 · Civil Rights+7 morePlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $85,000 · HealthCRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $25,000 · HealthABORTION CARE NETWORK: $13,000 · HealthCONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATION: $10,080 · Health+7 more: $23,000 · HealthFEED OUR RURAL KIDS INC: $55,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $6,500 · Food & NutritionHEADWATERS FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionThird Avenue Charitable Organization: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $3,000 · Food & NutritionWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $54,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE: $6,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $6,000 · Human ServicesURBAN INITIATIVES INC: $4,500 · Human Services+4 more: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$1,439,810Environment$482,250Education$384,500Civil Rights$245,500Health$156,080Food & Nutrition$90,000Human Services$85,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $192,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $130,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $126,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILDERNESS WATCH INC: $119,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetNORTHWOODS ALLIANCE INCORPORATED: $105,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $85,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $79,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $62,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY: $55,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFEED OUR RURAL KIDS INC: $55,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $55,000 over 5y, 60% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $54,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $44,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER INC: $24,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION: $22,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $19,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $17,330 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOYAGEURS CONSERVANCY: $16,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNORS CLIMB FOUNDATION: $10,080 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAND O LAKES COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND INC: $8,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $7,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOut Youth Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIngersoll Gender Center: $6,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION NW: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS ALLIANCE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FEED OUR RURAL KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS TEXT LINE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raikes FoundationWA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raikes Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Tides Foundation · The Russell Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary and Charles Sethness Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary and Charles Sethness Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Howard County Conservancy Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Cat Depot: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary and Charles Sethness Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mary and Charles Sethness Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 162 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary and Charles Sethness’ filings →

More from the funding graph