Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martin Field Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$39kHealth$20kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$4kEmployment$4kAnimals$4kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$579k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT FOUNDATION$8,650
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CV$4,800
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD$4,400
THE GRANT FUHR FOUNDATION$4,100
ONE VALLEY FOUNDATION$2,950
OLIVE CREST$2,800
GSM CHARITY AUCTIONS$1,500
SHAY'S WARRIORS$650
Individual grant recipient$400
THE LIVING DESERT ZOO & GARDENS$270
TOUR DE PALM SPRINGS$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $550) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $300 → 14%SAFEHOUSE OF THE DESERT: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
AZ
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 40 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 32 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
35

Total granted

$116k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+10%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthEducationEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC
    8× · 2018–2026 · $35k · revenue +10%
  • CO
    College of the Desert Foundation
    3× · 2023–2026 · $10k · revenue +124%
  • OV
    ONE VALLEY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2024–2026 · $8k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • AW
    ALL WITHIN MY HANDSgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $4k · revenue +234%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB HOLLYWOOD
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • XP
    XAVIER PREP SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
The Jmt Wilderness Conservancy

Working to restore the watersheds, wilderness, and wildlife in the high sierra nevada following the john muir trail (est. 1915) for all life in california.

Environment
7
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
8
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
9
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
10
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
11
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
12
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Last Chance for Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
29/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $12,650 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $7,900 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CV: $6,700 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CVBOYS & GIRLS CLUB HOLLYWOOD: $2,500 · OtherVENICE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $2,475 · OtherGSM CHARITY AUCTIONS: $2,325 · OtherXAVIER PREP SCHOOL: $2,300 · Other+49 more: $21,143 · Other+49 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $34,900 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLY…+1 more: $300 · Youth DevelopmentONE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $7,800 · PhilanthropyONE VALLEY FOUNDA…GRANT FUHR FOUNDATION: $7,245 · PhilanthropyGRANT FUHR FOUNDA…ALL WITHIN MY HANDS: $3,900 · PhilanthropyALL WITHIN MY HAN…DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,400 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY …+1 more: $550 · PhilanthropyCollege of the Desert Foundation: $9,910 · EducationCollege o…MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $800 · EducationMONARCH S…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS INC: $800 · EducationNATIONAL …WILLIAM S HART EDUCATION FOUNDATION WISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $470 · Education+1 more: $350 · EducationOLIVE CREST: $4,600 · HealthMICHAEL HOEFFLIN FOUNDATION: $1,991 · HealthChild & Family Center: $525 · HealthCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION: $500 · Health+1 more: $150 · HealthLIVING DESERT THE: $2,770 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $400 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $300 · Environment+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $50 · Recreation & Sports
Other$57,993Youth Development$35,200Philanthropy$21,895Education$12,330Health$7,766Environment$3,570Recreation & Sports$1,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $34,900 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCollege of the Desert Foundation: $9,910 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $7,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $2,770 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL HOEFFLIN FOUNDATION: $1,991 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS INC: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOVING ALL ANIMALS INC: $550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChild & Family Center: $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM S HART EDUCATION FOUNDATION WISH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $470 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFood Now Inc: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEVENSON RANCH ELEMENTARY PTO: $350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLast Chance for Animals: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAROUSEL RANCH INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $229 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCDRINC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds College of the Desert Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ONE VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRANT FUHR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds ALL WITHIN MY HANDS ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL HOEFFLIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHAYS WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds LOVING ALL ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Child & Family Center ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Champions Volunteer FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin Field Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin Field Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martin Field’s filings →

More from the funding graph