Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martin and Patricia Jahn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.3MHuman Services$1.2MHousing & Shelter$540kReligion$463kArts & Culture$435kHealth$234kEnvironment$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $177k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUN$1,042,138
NORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUN$353,203
DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$310,066
Individual grant recipient$177,006
DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS$15,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NW INDI$10,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WE$1,000
BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC$1,000
HINSDALE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE: $527k → 7%KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE: $501k → 7%KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE: $2k → 7%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $3k → 14%KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE: $1k → 7%MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERA: $210k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 22 repeat orgs$566k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$6.4M
$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+37%

Still filing today

68%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $188k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +41%
  • TC
    THE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS
    3× · 2022–2025 · $330k · revenue +34%
  • MN
    MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $234k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • MS
    MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $210k · revenue +29%
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SP
    St Pauls United Methodist Church
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

—
2
The Great Lakes Historical Society

The great lakes historical society is dedicated to the preservation of great lakes history.

—
3
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
4
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
5
Michigan Maritime Museum Inc

The organization is dedicated to preservation of michigan great lakes and waterways, maritime history and culture, and provides maritime education opportunities to the public through permanent and changing exhibits, research library, and…

Arts & Culture
6
Michigan City Historical Socie

To promote historical study and preserve the lighthouse museum

—
7
Milwaukee County Historical Society Inc

The milwaukee county historical society was founded in 1935 to collect, preserve, and make available materials relating to the history of the milwaukee community.

Arts & Culture
8
Marquette County Historical Society

Preserving the history of our area brings an understanding to the past and present, and provides a guide for the future. we not only maintain exhibits, artifacts and a research library, we provide a forum for engaging the community and…

Arts & Culture
9
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
10
Great Lakes Museum of Science Environment and Technology

Our mission is to make science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) come alive, and our vision is a community where all people value stem to inform decision making and enrich lives. (continued on schedule o)guiding principles: we help…

Science & Tech
11
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
12
Leelanau Historical Society

Inspire people to explore the past, understand the present, and envision the future of the diverse cultures in the leelanau peninsula and its islands. this is done by exhibitions and educational programs and perserving artifacts,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mclaren Northern Michigan Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Armed Forces Council of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUN: $2,491,030 · OtherNORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNIndividual grant recipient: $1,302,205 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS: $329,988 · OtherTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASSHINSDALE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $312,672 · OtherHINSDALE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $177,006 · Other+16 more: $546,100 · Other+16 moreTHE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,337,818 · PhilanthropyTHE DUPAGE COMMUNI…KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE: $1,030,702 · Human ServicesKING-BRUWAERT HO…MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesMIDWEST SHELTER …+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $233,500 · HealthBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $210,000 · Housing & ShelterMACKINAW AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $60,000 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT LAKES LIGHTHOUSE KEEPERS ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT LAKES SHIPWRECK HISTORICAL SO: $3,000 · Arts & CultureHistorical Society of Michigan: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $30,000 · EnvironmentLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $4,000 · Environment
Other$5,159,001Philanthropy$1,337,818Human Services$1,243,202Health$233,500Housing & Shelter$210,000Arts & Culture$74,000Environment$34,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,337,818 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetKING-BRUWAERT HOUSE: $1,030,702 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS: $329,988 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $233,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $210,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetMIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC: $210,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetMACKINAW AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $60,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetMACKINAC ASSOCIATES: $33,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetArmed Forces Council of Chicago: $30,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES LIGHTHOUSE KEEPERS ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT LAKES SHIPWRECK HISTORICAL SO: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHospital Sisters Mission Outreach Corporation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHistorical Society of Michigan: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST SHELTER FOR HOMELESS VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAW AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds Armed Forces Council of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES LIGHTHOUSE KEEPERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES SHIPWRECK HISTORICAL SO ↗
  • Who funds Hospital Sisters Mission Outreach Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Historical Society of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Honor Flight Chicago Corp ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin and Patricia Jahn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin and Patricia Jahn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martin and Patricia Jahn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph